×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Power Factor Vs. Motor Poles
3

Power Factor Vs. Motor Poles

Power Factor Vs. Motor Poles

(OP)
Working on a project requiring very high motor efficiency.  In reviewing motor selections, I notice with changes in the number of poles in asynchronous motors, PF changes.  Can anyone explain why?

RE: Power Factor Vs. Motor Poles

For the same horsepower, a lower-speed motor has bigger radius.  That means larger rotor circumference.  That means longer airgap (not deeper airgap... longer around the circumference).

Magnetizing a longer circumference to the same flux density will require more magnetizing amperes.   

=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.

RE: Power Factor Vs. Motor Poles

Low pf in low speed machines is due to more flux leakages between the poles.  

RE: Power Factor Vs. Motor Poles

In my opinion both gentlemen are right. The rotor diameter is bigger if the poles number is bigger [as electricpete stated] .But as the magnetic flux will be almost the same (depending more or less upon the voltage), the magnetic flux density [B] - measured in Gauss [or Wb/sqr.m=Tesla] will be different.
The rotor diameter will increase with the factor depending on p^ (2/3) that means for p=2 [4 poles] will be 2^ (2/3) =
1.587 times the diameter of 2 poles motor [roughly]. But the magnetic flux density will increase 2 time [as the air gap length per poles will be 1/2].So, ultimately, the flux density will increase 2/1.578= 1.267 times [roughly, of course!].
That means  the saturation of the magnetic core [mainly in the teeth region]will be more pronounced in return, so the  magnetizing amperes will increase[ as electricpete said].But in the same time also the notch leakage reactance will increase[ as edison123 said].The influence of the magnetizing current on the pf is evidently more important than the leakage reactance.
Best Regards

 

RE: Power Factor Vs. Motor Poles

Tell us about your application.  Induction motors are inharently inefficient since power is required to flux the rotor.

RE: Power Factor Vs. Motor Poles

(OP)
GREAT answers all - thanks!  I'll try to stay of the EE's hair on this one!  :)
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources