×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

JFET Symmetry 2

JFET Symmetry 2

JFET Symmetry 2

(OP)
Hi NG,
relating to my previous question (31 Jul 08) I've found out that the specifications vary pretty much from part to part.
I'd like to test the SOT23-JFET before soldering it to my board. Has anyone heard of or built a test fixture for SOT23?
Any ideas?

RE: JFET Symmetry 2

No, I have not heard of any form of test fixture for a SOT23, but that isn't to say that some form of socket does't exit.

At the same time, I have to question the thinking behind your query.  What it looks like you are wanting to do is to 'cherry pick' for devices that meet a particular parameter that can't be guaranteed.  Unfortunately, this is a very poor way to design and while it may work for a one off prototype, it is almost guarenteed to be a failure in the long run.

The trick in designing with transistors is to design the circuit so that the behavior depends on the components you can control rather than an intrinsic property of the transistor itself.  This is especially true when the dependant property is one that can vary a lot.  For example, when desiging a simple common emitter amplifier, one sets the gain by choosing the ratio of collector and emitter resistances as opposed to relying on the intrinsic emitter resistance.

my suggestion would be to revisit your circuit to find a different approach that is not dependant on the varying characteristics of the device.

 

RE: JFET Symmetry 2

I agree with Noway2 that it would be better to design the circuit so that it is not dependent on pre-screening parts for that application.  

However, if you wanted to proceed with testing parts, Emulation Technology has ZIF sockets for SOT23 parts:
http://www.emulation.com/catalog/off-the-shelf_solutions/sockets/sot/

Glenn

RE: JFET Symmetry 2

I'm certainly in with Noway too.

Having to test transistors means the price for your product is all over the place.  You need to pay someone a fortune to sit and test them and you can end up having to throw away no parts on one production run and all of them the next run!  How can you budget for that?  This means you are possibly paying 10x or 40x the original per piece price.

You would be better off paying much more for a specified higher grade part or just design the circuit more forgivingly and use a cheaper part.

Keith Cress
kcress - http://www.flaminsystems.com

RE: JFET Symmetry 2

I ditto everyone else.  The designer's task is not to merely produce a circuit that works, once in a while, but one that works over the entire span of environments, and component parameters.

Just because you have a working part at room temperature, doesn't even guarantee proper operation over temperature or over lifetime.

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: JFET Symmetry 2

(OP)
Hi all,
naturally you're right.It is a desperate attempt to boost the specs of the device at unacceptable costs.I must find another way to cure the problem or resign to the actual state of accuracy.
Thanks  

RE: JFET Symmetry 2

Without a better understanding of your circuit, it is difficult to make exact recommendations...but....

Are you certain that a jfet is the right part for the job or would you get better results from an enhancement mode (ie mosfet) which typically has a higher gain ratio and more controllable paramaters?

Regardless, it really sounds like you need to start by revisiting the product requirements, including the cost and determine if the two are capable of matching up.


 

RE: JFET Symmetry 2

(OP)
@Noway2
look at my post from 31 July 08 for some details.I switch 2 channels 1Vpeak dc to 10 MHz to an opamp with switchable gain.Perhaps a series connection of n-channel and p-channel Mosfets works.I don't know.Sounds complicated anyway.Also capacitance is an issue. My problem is that the prototype had accidentally well matched JFETs.Now that the layout is made and all corrections are included the final device is less accurate.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources