×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Equipment SCA and protection

Equipment SCA and protection

Equipment SCA and protection

(OP)
Electrical equipment often has a "Short Circuit Amps (SCA)" rating.  If the available SCA exceeds the equipment's rating, but the upstream protective device to this equipment is sized to operate at a value less than the equipment's SCA rating, is this acceptable?  
Thanks
 

RE: Equipment SCA and protection

In general, no.  Because you don't know which device will operate first.  If the upstream device and the device in question have been tested together and are UL (or similar) listed as a tested combination, AND the tested combination has an interrupting rating exceeding your available fault current, then it is acceptable.   

RE: Equipment SCA and protection

I agree with DPC for Low Voltage Equipment, but I have seen may studies by equipment manufacturers on Medium Voltage equipment where the upstream devices clear before donwstrem protective devices and the studies considers this acceptable. One example is for low intrrupting bayonette fuses in a padmount transformer, which are ovrdutied and the upstream breaker clears the fault.
This is contrary to the UL series rating rules on Low Voltage equipment. I have not gotten what I consider good scoop on this but I have seen it a number of times in studies from these reputabe companies ?
JIM  

RE: Equipment SCA and protection

(OP)
Thanks for the info.  I have also seen this anomaly with MV equipment.  LV systems, especially old systems with new engineering studies, sometimes have equipment rated less than the available calculated SCA.  What can be done immediately (without massive capital investment)?  For adjustable trip units on CBs the Inst. can be set below the equipment rated SCA in the interim, but, from what I'm hearing, this is not a permanent answer?

RE: Equipment SCA and protection

You might be able to apply current-limiting fuses ahead of devices with insufficient short circuit capability.  That may be one of the easier fixes to consider without too high a price tag.

Another option is installing current-limiting reactors.  This lowers your available short-circuit current, increases your voltage regulation and is a more significant cost to consider.  It will require you to rework your short-circuit study too.

RE: Equipment SCA and protection

Adjusting the trip units is not even a temporary solution.  That does nothing to reduce the magnitude of the fault current.

You can install current-limiting fuses upstream but again they must be a test combination with the breakers you are trying to protect.  If the fuse is too large, it won't help.  The breaker manufacturer should be able to give you information on what current-limiting fuses would work.  

 

RE: Equipment SCA and protection

You can also upgrade you breakers for increased interuption ratings. We do alot of those.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources