×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Outlet Control Structures (square vs. circular)

Outlet Control Structures (square vs. circular)

Outlet Control Structures (square vs. circular)

(OP)
I have an outlet control structure in a standard detention pond that I specified as a square concrete shape.  I was told that most engineers use ciruclar due to cost, also how well it holds on to an earth pond embankment... is this correct?, and is this a better shape when placing the outlet in an earthen pond embankment?

RE: Outlet Control Structures (square vs. circular)

A couple things need to be clarified first:
does your outfall structure contain multiple stage weirs or orifices?
does the design call for the structure to be cast-in-place or pre-cast?
how large of a structure are we talking about here (height and width/diameter)?

I have been working with storm water design for several years now and have never specified a circular outfall structure.  I have seen ponds overdesigned and their discharge limited by one outfall pipe, without a structure.  
The structures I typical specify have to control the release of multiple storm events and therefore typically have multiple weirs and/or orifices.  They are also specified as cast-in-place due to the complexity of the weir/orifice structures and the size of the units.  I recently specified a polygonal outfall structure with the largest face containing the primary orifice and the multiple orifice system.  It was approximately 30' wide, 12' deep, and 12' tall made of 8" thick reinforced concrete.

If your system requires only a single orifice (and possibly an open top of structure) I see no problem specifying a circular structure.  I would count this as the exception rather than the rule.

Nate
 

RE: Outlet Control Structures (square vs. circular)

a CMP or HDPE riser with holes or slots cut in the sides as orifices is quite inexpensive and circular.  However, for anything tall or large, you will need to use concrete and it is difficult to construct forming for a circular concrete structure.  

I'm not sure I know what you mean by "how well it holds on to an earth pond embankment..."

RE: Outlet Control Structures (square vs. circular)

(OP)
Thank you for asking me to clarify.  I have a multiple orifice structure, to handle different frequency storms (ie:  FYI this is Georgia, water quality 1 year-24 hour release, channel protection 2 year-24 hour, emergency overflow 100 year).  Is there any hydraulic, structural or cost advantage to circular vs. square?  And what i meant by 'hold on' to the embankment was,... preventing the structure from sliding or tipping over due to buoyancy...even though it would be constructed into the side of the pond embankment.  My intention is for the structure to remain 'rigid' in the earth embankment and not move during water ponding inside the pond.

Most of our structures, i believe are precast... say 4' x 4' inside diameter, no more than 12-14 feet tall.  Mine is 16 in this case.

RE: Outlet Control Structures (square vs. circular)

circular pipe is available and makes an excellent riser at relatively low cost. However, for larger structures, cast in place might be better and then it should be square if possible.  I'm not aware that the shape of the pipe has any influence on it's buoyancy.

RE: Outlet Control Structures (square vs. circular)

The standard around here is round flow control structures.

See http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Design/Standards/Plans.htm#SectionB
B-10.40 and B-10.60

Large projects often require custom structures, which could be cast-in-place or precast vaults with internal weirs, baffles, orifices added.

RE: Outlet Control Structures (square vs. circular)

It doesnt matter what you use as long as your shape area is substantiated by your flow calculations. It sounds like you are using an external weir with multiple control points. If they Cast in Place, they can form any shape that you want.

Just remember the poor guys that have to construct the forms. And also be nice to yourself and make you orifice or weir calculations easier on you with the simplest shape you can get away with (ie circles or squares).

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources