×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Other 'job'
15

Other 'job'

Other 'job'

(OP)
I just started working for another company, and now have 5 technicians working for me.  They are Non-Exempt, Hourly, non Union.  These particular technicians are a special group in that only one can back up for another.  So, two are on one system, two on another, and I back up for the third.

One of the technician's hobby is refereeing highschool and younger football in the fall.  5 nights a week plus weekends.

I've only been here two months, and I've already heard that last fall, there were issues in the plant and he just left because he had to 'ref' a game.

I am now running into an issue where we need him to travel this fall, where he will miss his 'hobby'.  He already said, not only will he not go, but he can not go because he already signed a contract to ref.  He does get paid for some of the games.

I can understand family issues or emergencies precluding work, but this behavior is not desireable in the workplace.

Where do outside interests conflict with work and what can be done with an hourly worker who decides he doesn't want to work overtime?  Again, we only have one other person to cover for him, and due to vacations, etc. he is not always available.

How is this handled?

______________________________________________________________________________
This is normally the space where people post something insightful.

RE: Other 'job'

You can do nothing to someone who does not wish to work overtime other than replace him with someone who does.  It is his prerogative to work the required hours and no more.  The only argument you could make is the position requires someone who is a little more flexible with their time and therefore he needs to be replaced.  What he does after work is irrelevant... the situation is exactly the same whether he refs football games or helps his ailing mother in the nursing home.

You can either choose to work around his inflexible schedule, or find someone who is willing to work around yours, plain and simple.
 

Dan - Owner
http://www.Hi-TecDesigns.com

RE: Other 'job'

Is there a pay differential for working past scheduled hours?  What is the remuneration for travel expenses?  Is he taking this part-time "job" (as he does get paid for it) because he needs additional money or because his kid is on the team?    What are the penalties if he breaches his contract with the league?  Why is the other guy always taking vacations when he is needed to back up this guy?  

Maybe he would be more amenable if you offered him more.  Just a thought.  Today your workers are not unionized.  But that doesn't mean tomorrow they sign the cards.

RE: Other 'job'

There is an implied risk in having two jobs.  If one can not assume additional responsibility at one job, then the consequences are reduced performance, poor perception of one's performance by management, and thus less likely to get promoted and more likely to get mediocre reviews and raises.

No need to force the employee to count the cost.  Just find another player.

Of course, if there are no benefits to be had with increased travel and responsibility, I would be in the same camp as the "ref".

RE: Other 'job'

Unless he signed a contract requiring travel, he's under no obligation to do so.  

Given his lack of cooperation, the next time there's a downsizing, I can guess whose name will top the short list.  Certainly, it would appear that his uncooperativeness would lead to resentment on the part of the others that must take up the slack, and you might wind up losing someone else, who is more cooperative; a lose-lose.

Overall, I wonder if having only one backup is realistic.  One might also wonder if training an additional backup might give him food for thought.  As a general rule, we liked to have all the technicians cross-trained, to eliminate problems such as this.

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Other 'job'

3
Just something to keep in mind, refereeing kids is an important 'hobby'. Imagine the ramifications if every employer could force their employees not to referee.

It's just unfortunate for you that you have one on your team.

RE: Other 'job'

5 nights a week plus weekends and no travel whatsoever is not a hobby, it's a lifestyle.  

Even when I was single, I only bowled league 3 nights a week, which I would dump if I had to make a business trip.

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Other 'job'

The plant has requirements, a guy was hired to fill the requirements, if he can't or won't - get someone else.

Greg Lamberson, BS, MBA
Consultant - Upstream Energy
Website: www.oil-gas-consulting.com
 

RE: Other 'job'

We have a secondary employment or moonlighting policy.  If the second job does not interfere with normal business activities or compete it is OK.  You cannot do work related to secondary employment on company time or use company resources in support of secondary employment.

I would recommend carefully looking through your policies and job descriptions for the position.  This gives you some sort of framework hopefully to work from.  HR can hopefully help you a bit there as well.  I would definitely take a look at some additional cross training within your group.

As for ethical concerns, from what I can tell, there are not really any issues present as the employee appears to be working within (perhaps strictly by), the rules.

Regards,

RE: Other 'job'

(OP)

Quote (DonPE):

Is there a pay differential for working past scheduled hours?  
1 1/2 times normal pay.

Quote:

What is the remuneration for travel expenses?  
Full reimbursement of all expenses.  1 1/2 times normal pay anything over 8 hours/day.  No weekend work or travel.

Quote:

Is he taking this part-time "job" (as he does get paid for it) because he needs additional money or because his kid is on the team?  
Don't know if he needs the additional money.  Personal finance is his responsibility.  These positions are the highest paid for non exempt in the plant.  His kids are not on the teams.   

Quote:

What are the penalties if he breaches his contract with the league?  
Not our problem.

Quote:

Why is the other guy always taking vacations when he is needed to back up this guy?  
If one person were travelling for work or taking vacation himself, then the second person cannot take vacation.  This is a completely different situation.

Quote:

Maybe he would be more amenable if you offered him more.
Highest paid technicians in the plant.  He is not refing only for the money.  He doesn't get paid for the games during the week, only the weekends.

______________________________________________________________________________
This is normally the space where people post something insightful.

RE: Other 'job'

(OP)

Now:

What changes if this person was the engineer?  Salary, no overtime pay, exempt.

______________________________________________________________________________
This is normally the space where people post something insightful.

RE: Other 'job'

Does the employement contract this individual holds dictate he must be available to cover his back to back colleague or travel as part of the business?  If so, and he is refusing to do so then he is in breach of contract.  Set the lawyers on him

If the contract doesn't say anything like that, and it is 'expected' he does so, but not formalised legally, is he breaking his contract? Nope.

By not refereeing he claims to be breaking the contract he holds with the football association, which potentially means he has put himself in a position where he cannot fulfil both contracts.

Sounds like the lawyers will be needed, and a judge to determine which contract has legal precedence, especially if the chap is fired and this ends up in an employment tribunal.

   

RE: Other 'job'

Everyone should have activities beyond work, it is what grounds us and makes us stable and productive.  Employers should respect (maybe encourage) these activities if they want happy and productive employees.

Having said that, employees shouldn't neglect their responsibilities to their co-workers and employers for the sake of extracurricular activities.  If they do, they shouldn't be surprised when they will have to look for a new employer.

Travel plans "in the Fall" is ample time to give any employee to make arrangements to be prepared for the trip.  I know I get upset when I am told at 11am that I need to travel somewhere "tomorrow".  If I am given a couple days notice I can manage issues at home for the trip, no worries.

I would talk with your supervisor, tell him the situation, and what you think should happen (tech goes on trip).  Your supervisor should back you, but since you have only been there for a short amount of time, your supervisor may have some insight that you don't.  Take it all in, then make your choice... and maybe look to hire a new tech before the Fall.

"Art without engineering is dreaming; Engineering without art is calculating."

Have you read FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies to make the best use of these Forums?

RE: Other 'job'

I'm not a lawyer but there must be consideration whan a contract is involved.  He cannot be found in breach of contract if he is not paid, i.e the weekly games.

Just my 2 cents

RE: Other 'job'

3

MadMango is right.  Do you really want an employee who can travel at the drop of a hat because his life outside of work consists of sitting in front of a TV drinking beer and watching Wheel of Fortune?  

At least this guy is providing a community service, and staying is good health.  He is out running, getting fresh air and exercise!  That alone is worth a great deal to his employer.

You walked into a pre-existing situation.  Why not take a more blameless stance?

Assume that Mr. Ref either did not know about the travel 'requirement', or it is a change in his work situation, or that there was a tacit acceptance of the time restrictions imposed by his hobby.  Whether true or not, try to put yourself into that frame of mind.

Ask Mr. Ref if the league in which he coaches can provide a substitute referee for the time during which he will need to travel for work.  Explain that he is valued at work and he is needed to be off site for an important task.  Tell him you are very happy that he has this noble outside interest and that you would like to help him keep it as much as practicable.

There must be someone who organizes the league.  Offer to talk to them to see what you can offer, perhaps a small donation or corporate sponsorship.  Have your company buy a couple of cases of Capri Sun juice boxes for the team, then drop them off with the organizer and have a little chat.  If you try a different approach, you can work out something that feels good for everyone.

But if you are determined to use the big 'ol government stick, here's a pretty comprehensive site describing Federal law that does not burden you with a lot of legalese.  There is also a link to find out your State's labor laws.

If it were me, I'd keep the government out of it. No one will end up feeling good about it.

http://employeeissues.com/overtime_pay_2.htm



 

"If you are going to walk on thin ice, you might as well dance!"

RE: Other 'job'

I'm in sort of a similar situation.  I have a semi-paid hobby that includes contracts for certain dates, booked months in advance.  Mostly it's evenings and weekends, but sometimes I take vacation days or comp time.  No problem there; our vacation and comp time exists to be taken (with sufficient advance notice, of course).

I'm supposed to travel here and there for work.  I can schedule these trips myself, and I work around other conflicts (not just the hobby, but other normal aspects of having a personal life).

Lately, though, there has been a project involving lengthy travel, and I have not had control over the dates.  For the most recent trip, I had 14 days' notice to be gone for two weeks (and those two weeks turned into almost three).  To do that, I had to find a substitute for a gig that I had a signed contract for.  (And even if I didn't have a signed contract, it was someone's wedding.  Can't just cancel for that.)

This is not what I signed up for when I took this job; in fact, I took this job so that I would be able to pursue my hobby (and my employers at the time were quite aware of this).  If I have to spend the next year of my life ready to travel at the drop of a hat (and 14 days counts as hat-drop timeframe in my world), that means I can't commit to *anything* for the next year.  It would be a bit of a financial loss, but mostly it's a major blow to my quality of life.  And although I'm hardly starving on an engineer's salary, I am sure as hell not paid nearly enough to give up what, in the absence of children and pets, matters to me most.

I finally sat down with my boss & said I can't live that way.  Fortunately for me, he agreed that I shouldn't have to.  The tight scheduling should mostly go away, and that will give more flexibility for scheduling the trips.  Unfortunately, it's still not really working for me because I can't pin down the schedule far enough in advance; if I know I have to go "sometime in December or January", that still ties up two months for me, and possibly more as the schedule inevitably slips.

So I understand the ref's position.  He had his plans already made that were consistent with his job expectations, and then the expectations were changed.

Can he make some of the trips and have the other guy cover the others?  Other than that, I'm with Casseopeia.

Hg

Eng-Tips policies:  FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Other 'job'

So, this employee works-to-live rather than lives-to-work?

Last I heard, slavery was outlawed around the world. So what you need to do is hire someone who doesn't have a life.

Or - - - decide the glass is half-full and let things be.

RE: Other 'job'

Everyone has a choice; his is to decline travelling by whatever means possible.  Mine would be to start looking for his replacement.  In a reasonable world, there could have been a reasonable compromise.  

I don't see that it was unreasonable to occasionally ask for a business trip.  To flatly reject all business travel is unreasonable, given the parameters of the job.

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Other 'job'

Quote (IRStuff):

I don't see that it was unreasonable to occasionally ask for a business trip.  To flatly reject all business travel is unreasonable, given the parameters of the job.
I disagree.  From the OP's description, it sounds like this travel is something new this year.  If the guy went into this job under the assumption of "no travel", he's well within his rights to put his foot down and stay in town.  We have no idea what's going on in his life... maybe a family member is ill or special needs and requires constant care.

Point is, it's none of our business his reasons for denying the travel.  Unless the job description specifically mentioned travel, the company has no leg to stand on, legally or morally.  Change the guy out with someone new if the job description has changed, but don't spend time thinking of ways to light a fire under his rear, it's not appropriate.

Dan - Owner
http://www.Hi-TecDesigns.com

RE: Other 'job'

Disagree - a company has to adjust to market conditions, competition, client requirements, sales volume, whatever.  They have an obligation to do so to the stockholders/owners.  We live in a fluid world.  If an employee can't or won't make the adjustments needed to be made by the company, that's his right, but it's the company's right to replace if him/her if they need something done and he'she can't/won't.

What does a company have to do - foresee forever when they hire someone all of the possibilities that may come up in his job form that point until eternity, anticipate those and put them in a contract or job description and it's just tough luck if a situation changes.

Greg Lamberson, BS, MBA
Consultant - Upstream Energy
Website: www.oil-gas-consulting.com
 

RE: Other 'job'

(OP)
My original question didn't include the fact that he has been travelling about 15% this year already (with no complaints - in fact has said he enjoys it), knew it could interfere this Autumn, and is just now saying he will not travel due to outside interests.

Travel was known.

______________________________________________________________________________
This is normally the space where people post something insightful.

RE: Other 'job'

You asked for travel this fall (mid September to mid December).  He can not, or will not travel.  So just start inteviewing other technicians.  He will either realign his priorities or you will have his replacement.  If anything you will have a back-up for the 3rd pair.

RE: Other 'job'

It does seem that a bit of compromise would not go a miss here.

He does seem willing to travel for the rest of the year, so it is not like he is just being totally awkward; however the whole of the fall is a long time to be tied up.

 I am not sure the attitude of the company actually helps anyone.
Q What are the penalties if he breaches his contract with the league?
A Not our problem

Maybe he would be prepared to travel more out of the fall and give up refereeing for one week or so in the fall as a compromise, if the company were not so heavy handed?

Back in my younger days I had similar issues when I played semi-pro rugby, but we always over came them with give and take from both parties.

The other thing that strikes me is the amount of people that just say sack him and get a replacement in. It must be a hell of a lot easier to sack people in the States than it is in Europe/ UK.
 

RE: Other 'job'

ajack1:

In the US, most employees are considered at-will employees unless they have an employment contract.  This means the employee can be fired for any reason whatsoever, and the employee can leave for any reason whatsoever.  There are state-to-state exceptions to the "fire-at-will" policy, of course, but most employees just accept it and move on to the next company.  Ironically, even many so-called "contract" employees typically fall under the fire-at-will policy.

Usually union employees and some professions have employment contracts.  If you're really good at what you do, you can set up a contract with your company, but it's not easy.

It is indeed sad that people are treated as disposable items, but it's not going to change any time soon.  Casseopeia had some good ideas for finding a solution.  

My only observation is something that people should keep in mind when they say "just get rid of the guy".  Its that employees don't form unions; bad companies do.  I've seen it happen and it can get ugly.

RE: Other 'job'

2
Sorry I'm a little late on this.

When are engieers going to give up this attitude of the company's all-powerful godlike ability to run every second of the lives of their employees?  That went out more than 75 years ago.  Just because you have to work many overtime hours unpaid and travel after hours and on weekends... whatever, because of your exempt status (lucky you), there should be no reason why you should want to apply the same conditions to employees that are not burdend with such rubbish.  Hourly company employee policies apply only to the hours the employee is scheduled to work plus any mutually agreed overtime and on-call periods.  If s/he is a backup for another employee, that requirement should only be applicable to the shift the employee is working plus any mutually agreed overtime and on-call periods.  Overtime should be optional and agreed by both employer and employee, as well as on-call periods.  Neither should not working overtime be a basis for penalizing the employee in future advancement or wages.  When scheduled overtime is necessary, for backup or otherwise, it is obvious that the employer is underestimating his resource requirements and should be at fault.  If that is a temporary condition only, some allowance can be given to the employer, however if such can be considered as a permanent or semi-permanent necessity of the employer, no.  In the case where the employer is attempting to use his preceived position of power in the relationship to officially or unofficially require, or by threat of some alternative undesireable consequence to the employee, to force the employee into compliance the employer is taking an unfair advantage of the employee.

I always considered overtime as needed only when something got out of control.   A time when productivity is decreased to such a low level that continuing to work it at such low efficiency might be "worth it" for a very very short time just to achieve some minute quantity of progress or achieve an important deadline, but if continued especially on a routine basis, should be a sign of grave things to come,... or a company taking advantage of its clients.

"I'm all in favor of keeping dangerous weapons out of the hands of fools. Let's start with typewriters."
- Frank Lloyd Wright (1868-1959)

RE: Other 'job'

I think biginch has some good observations here!

If hes highly paid - is he easy to replace? How is is general attitude except doing overtime when it affects his hobby?

Im a scout leader and also like my hobby - and outdoor life in general. I also sometimes twists my work schedule a little to meet my obligations as a scout leader.

So give the guy a break if his work apart from this is fine! You dont know if a replacement has even more strange habits!

Best regards

Morten

RE: Other 'job'

Morton, thanks for the encouragement... like I need it aye?

Not everybody lives to work.  Working to live should be part of the deal too, but if the other extreme is your bag, don't try to make everyone help you carry your burden around.  My best advice is, call it a night and go to a game with him.  Maybe you'll both work better together too.  Who knows.  

... And heck, if it doesn't work out, send him on over.  That's all I ask of my employees... unless there's a deadline to meet.

Remember, "The devil you know can be much better than the devil you don't."

"I'm all in favor of keeping dangerous weapons out of the hands of fools. Let's start with typewriters."
- Frank Lloyd Wright (1868-1959)

RE: Other 'job'

2
It seems from the companies perspective you have a few options:
1.  Hire another employee to back up this one.
2.  Hire another employee to replace this one.
3.  Pound sand.

If an employee was say going to school, would it be more acceptable?  What if the employee were fulfilling a religious obligation?  Would your paradigm shift any?  If yes, then it is a case of you have a problem with the hobby.  If no, then you have a problem with employees having lives.

RE: Other 'job'

I doubt that mandatory travel is actually a part of his job.  He sounds like a good employee who has found a balance in life between work and fun.  He doesn't have a problem, you do.

I'm surpised you don't know how to handle the situation.  In your gut, your already know if you are going to fire him or if you're going to just going to be mad about it all the time.

RE: Other 'job'

There is no universal answer or policy to this issue. When I first started supervising people and had problem employees, I asked a retired friend for his opinion on how to handle the problems. His sage advice was that every employee has problems and talents. It boils down to the supervisor's judgement of whether an employee is worth the trouble or not.


 

RE: Other 'job'

Yes, it is true that effectively it is so in any case.  The issue is that the judgement should be made against fair standards, not against someone's unfair, or "biased"  standards.  In this case, the non-expempt employee is apparently being judged against exempt employee standards (to some degree), therefore (if that is true) such a judgement cannot be considered fair.

"I'm all in favor of keeping dangerous weapons out of the hands of fools. Let's start with typewriters."
- Frank Lloyd Wright (1868-1959)

RE: Other 'job'

What is with all these people saying to fire him? WTH? What would you do if someone told your boss to fire you?  The OP has painted a pretty good picture of this employee.  Firing him doesn't seem like an effective solution.  Now you have no one (trained) to send out this fall.  Talk about lack of foresight..... Heh, nothing will start things off right with your other new employees than a new manager firing a respected employee with expereince over a hobby.  It will take about 10 years to earn back the lost respect.

As for the company's attitude "Not our problem" ...I don't even know where to start.

Casseopia was on to something.  Find some kind of compromise like an adult.

On the other hand, is he completely in the right to bite the hand that feeds him? No. But I do HATE people whose lives revolve around work. And I have a deep respect for those of us who place priorities of life ahead of our employers (up to a point of course).

RE: Other 'job'

'But I do HATE people whose lives revolve around work.'

Now who is being extreme?

RE: Other 'job'

Quote (jut07):

But I do HATE people whose lives revolve around work.
Funny... as a business owner, I LOVE them!  Of course, I HATE any business that expects work to be my first priority, but I see nothing wrong with someone who lives to work.  It's their choice, they're free to make it.

And I believe "fire the guy" is simply a short way of saying "deal with his extra-curricular activities or look for someone without them".  It's not necessarily a mark against that particular employee, only an employer who wants to fill a spot with someone who can make themselves available during that time period.

It may not feel right to get rid of the guy because he no longer fit's the employer's schedule, but there's nothing that says the employer can't change his wants/needs.

Dan - Owner
http://www.Hi-TecDesigns.com

RE: Other 'job'

After I got off my soapbox, I realized I did come off a bit extreme.  Let me clarify if I may.

I don't hate the people, just the fact that some people let work dictate their lives and not the other way around. It is ultimately their choice though - you are right. (And it is great from a business owner's perspective.)  However, I stand by what I said about firing the guy.  There are plenty of solutions that don't involve those kinds of extremes, and many were already expressed above.  

Keep HR out of it. Keep your supervisor out of it. Keep the government out of it.  Everyone will benefit from that and I think we can all agree there.

RE: Other 'job'

I vote for letting the SOB go. He gets paid top $ and knows he has no oppertunity to meet clients demands. What are you going to tell your client, that he can't get his plant up and running till after the Super Bowl? of course not. You will go and this guy will be watching, as will everyone else. You have a choice here. You can say the needs of our clients are important and we will have people on srtaff who will make reasonable accomidations in their schedules to provide satisfactory service to our clients, or we are going to accomidate our clients at someone's convinence. Overtime is extra because it is inconvient.
I'm not saying people should not have outside lives, but this is not about refing a football game. This is about an old time hourly employee trying to get the young management guy to take all the bad hours. Everyone is watching. Your move.

RE: Other 'job'

Has he been reffing for years prior just so he could intimidate the new, young manager when he came aboard? I don't think so.

Is traveling part of his job requirement/contract? If this has been answered, my apologies, but I could not find it.

I'm guessing this guy is good at what he does. Is it worth firing him and training a new guy because of a service he provides to the community? I doubt it. Another solution MUST be found.

RE: Other 'job'

A good manager figures out how to balance his employee's need to ref with your need to get the job done.  Perhaps during the fall, others pick up his slack and the rest of the year, he picks up theirs.  Try to create a team where everyone helps each other.  Try reading Southwest Airline's book "Nuts!"

(been there, tried lots of things, eventually had to fired one when promises were not kept)

Don Phillips
http://worthingtonengineering.com

RE: Other 'job'

The first mistake here is treating a non-exempt employee like and exempt one.  Non-exempts will have a whole different attitude and would never expect to be fired over not wanting to work overtime.  You're the exempt guy.  You fill in for him this fall and hope business picks up enough (or promote more business as you should, as an exempt) to where you can bring on another non-exempt to fill in next year.  

One thing you need to consider is how YOUR superiors will feel about your reasoning for firing the guy.  If you let him go because you want someone on board that you don't have to back up yourself, they may let YOU go.  Be certain that they recognize the investment they have in your guy and expect you to protect that investment - with your own unpaid overtime if necessary.  I certainly would.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources