×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

METERING CHANGE OVER.

METERING CHANGE OVER.

METERING CHANGE OVER.

(OP)
We do have a client metered on 11kV. The facility is fed via two 11kV lines, initially supplied via a single feeder,A. Feeder B was on stand by but could be connected to the bus via an airbreak switch when A had a permanent fault. A changeover using voltage as the actuator was used. Both lines are now energized upto the respective breakers on request by the client,and a manual change over is carried out to the other feeder when onegoes off. The facility has one meter and the utility is not ready to instal another meter. I am trying to come out with a new autochangeover for the VTs; I have parralled the currents from CTs on both feeders to the meter but I need to have an autochange-over for the VTs.

The tie breaker is ever on and using loss of voltage as a change over mode is not possible anymore since both lines are usually energized upto the respective breaker. I thought of using the breaker contacts but the utility may not allow this for the purpose of integrity,lest they steal power... The diagrams are attached. Any suggetions?!

Note: The incoming cable confuration was ahd to be modified as shown in the diagram for the purpose of phasing out with the clients loads.

RE: METERING CHANGE OVER.

Hi
Small things, don't use two separated contactors.
Preferd use only one with changeover contacts CO.
Normal works from main, change over operated only by loss of voltages of main VT. Please take in account, it's same voltages if tie breaker is closed.
One of the option three small contaktors supplied by Voltages A, B, C from main VT, and sries connection of contacts of those relays controlled CO contactor.
Regards.
Slava

RE: METERING CHANGE OVER.

(OP)
Slavag,
We may not be communicating.. A similar changeover has failed since the CT currents on the reserve feeder don't match the PT voltages on the main feeder. Currents are shifted by 120 degrees and the Red phase current is zero. From the phasor diagrams I got from a power analysor the vectors are as follows:

Main feeder Voltage      Reserve feeder CTs

Red phase---------------- Yellow Phase
Yellow Phase------------- Blue phase
Blue phase--------------- Red phase

Please see the corrected diagram after a thorough investigation on the connection of the feeders. Feeder A is the main feeder.

Thanks guys

RE: METERING CHANGE OVER.

I'm afraid I can't make any sense out of your CT connections.  You have ØR from Breaker A paralleled with ØB from Breaker B, ØB from Breaker A paralleled with ØY from Breaker B, and ØY from Breaker A and ØR from Breaker B shorted.  What is the reasoning for this?
 

RE: METERING CHANGE OVER.

(OP)
The metering is 3phase 3wire. The yellow phase CT is shorted. The problem came in when the reserve feeder was connected to the bus. To phase out with the bus voltage the XLPE cable had to be connected as shown. The problem arsing from thr connections is that the Currents from the reserve CTs don't match the Main feeder PT voltages. The final diagram actually depicts the situation as it is; it makes sense... I got the lay-out from the Electrician at the installation  

RE: METERING CHANGE OVER.

Sorry, I don't puted attention on the  connectin between phases.
Agree with Jghrist, isn't clear.
R must be connect to R, Y to Y and B to B.
( by the way, a long time I don't see this naming).
Same for the voltages.
You only sum currents from both infeeds. Voltages are same for both infeeds ( I assume it, becouse you can paralelling them). We have such application for directional overcurrent protection 67.
Best Regards.
Slava

RE: METERING CHANGE OVER.

Sorry Aperenteng again. We send posts together.
I have think.
Slava

RE: METERING CHANGE OVER.

(OP)
Slavag and jgrhist
The termination is done as simple as it is in the diagram.  I have not altered anything. Study the diagram keenly and you will understand where the problem arises and your changeover scheme may not work. In addition to this, the info on the vectors as I gave in my previous post is very clear!!! The attachment has once again been edited.

RE: METERING CHANGE OVER.

You need to swap connections on the CT secondaries on breaker B so that you are summating quantities derived from the same primary phase out on the network. Also swap the VT secondary connections on Breaker B VT so that Red phase derived from breaker A VT corresponds to Red phase derived from breaker B VT and so on. If you do that the metering should summate correctly and the voltage changeover will work.
Regards
Marmite

RE: METERING CHANGE OVER.

Hi.
Apprenteng, your last drw is not opened.
But isn't important.
As Marmite wrote, you have swap all your connections.
Please dont pay attention on the R, Y, B of stand by infeed. You must connect CT and VT according to the main breaker and rename phases of stand by accordantly too.
Very simple - continiue with phase R from main across tie to stand by and rename this phase to R in the stand by side, now connect both CT's in parallel, connect same R of VT to CO contact. Same for all phases.
I still strongly recommend use one contactor with CO contacts and not two contactors, for avoid option of connection both VT's ( we had this issue twice in the synch systems)

Good Luck.
Slava
 

RE: METERING CHANGE OVER.

Hi Slava,

One option would be to use mechanically interlocked contactors for reversing duty. When one contactor pulls in an auxiliary contact it disables the coil of the other providing an electrical interlock. This solution has the benefit of three stable states: none selected; 'A' selected; 'B' selected. Here's an example:

https://mall.automation.siemens.com/GB/guest/index.asp?aktprim=0&lang=en&nodeID=8210110&foldersopen=-4710-4711-5221-5222-5223-5233-5234-5235-5236-&jumpto=5236

If the link screws up, it is the Siemens 3RA13 series if you want to have a look on their web site.
  

----------------------------------
  
If we learn from our mistakes I'm getting a great education!
 

RE: METERING CHANGE OVER.

Thanks a lot Scotty.
We used this interlock too, for many cases.
But, for the VT changeover we decide used only one contactor
with CO contacts, more simple control for one coil only.
Best Regards.
Slava
Have a nice weekend guys.
 

RE: METERING CHANGE OVER.

A couple of comments folks;
Using one contactor for voltage. Many contactors and relays are not rated for opposite polarities on the same contact set. A 120 degree phase shift would be similar to opposite voltages. I have seen many devices that were rated for 600 volts, yet opposite polarity use at 120 volts was forbidden.
If you are paralleling CTs, why not connect the PTs on the bus and cross connect the CTs so that the CTs match the PTs.
When you consider the financial implications of a failed voltage contact on a revenue meter, I strive to avoid any switching on revenue meters.

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter

RE: METERING CHANGE OVER.

Why wouldn't you just use 2 meters?

RE: METERING CHANGE OVER.

Bill, Scott you are right 100+%.
But in OP: "The facility has one meter and the utility is not ready to instal another meter"
Possible add new one or used multyfeeder meter.
BTW, this "utility is not ready to instal another meter"
isn't clear, it's interes of utility.
Best Regards.
Slava

RE: METERING CHANGE OVER.

Would be willing to bet if facility would buy the new meter, the utility would allow it to be installed, but who knows.

 

RE: METERING CHANGE OVER.

The change-over may work but consicer the commercial losses when the contactor fails. Before one get to discover the utility company may have lost quite some KWHrs.. A seperate meter may be the best solution commercially

RE: METERING CHANGE OVER.

(OP)
Guys,
The solutions are good but bear in mind too that an outage to may be check and swap the secondaries of CTs is not an option. Bear in mind the bus cannot be shut down and any work MUST be carried out live...

RE: METERING CHANGE OVER.

Quote:

any work MUST be carried out live...

Try defending that statement in court. The branch of government responsible for workplace safety would have you over a barrel because it is almost indefensible. It is very likely to be commercially beneficial to avoid an outage, planned or otherwise, and you might hear various manager types claiming that it 'MUST' be done without an outage, but in reality the work can and should be done with the circuit dead. The company's bottom line is rarely viewed as a sound reason for unsafe working practices.
  

----------------------------------
  
If we learn from our mistakes I'm getting a great education!
 

RE: METERING CHANGE OVER.

I agree with Scottty that no work is more important than human life....
But why not try this:-

Change the supply to the feeder on breaker A. Go the source of B and shift the cable terminations as below:

Y to R
R to B
B to Y

In doing this you shift the voltages +120 degrees according to your diagram.

You will not need to swap the CT secondaries now. You will now change the seondary connections of the PTs to match those of PTs on breaker A.U can then use one contactor with changeover contacts.

I believe the above can be done with the bus energized from feeder B since you will not open the CT secondaries

RE: METERING CHANGE OVER.

My bad. I see that the CTs appear to be correctly connected.
Is there any common point to which the PTs can be connected?
I realize that you probably don't get to say, but I would use an electronic meter from ABB or GE. They are capable of being programed to store almost any value that they measure and/or calculate. I have received from the utility, a computer disk with six weeks of kilowatt and individual phase voltage and current values at 15 minute intervals.
The customer issue in this case was voltage trends. Could the transformer taps be safely dropped to a lower utilization voltage?
In your instance, in the event that a contact failed on one phase of your changeover contactor, the billing information may be closely estimated by the current trends and the voltages on the healthy phases.
If I was forced to "go outside the box" and introduce a contactor to a revenue metering installation, I would try to use this feature as a recovery back up.

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources