×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

ACQ preservative and galvanized vs. stainless stell
2

ACQ preservative and galvanized vs. stainless stell

ACQ preservative and galvanized vs. stainless stell

(OP)
I was looking at the Simpson catalog on pg 11, and it recommends that all connectors be stainless steel, not galvanized,  if the wood in contact with the connectors has a preservative content of ACQ/MCQ > 0.40 lb'ft3  ...

 
So my question is, for a project on the beachfront, should we anticipate the wood having an ACQ content this high?  How do I know what ACQ content the wood treater will use?  And what is the $ difference between galvanized and SS finish?
 

RE: ACQ preservative and galvanized vs. stainless stell

Here's a good site to look at:

http://www.nadra.org/industry_news/acqarticle.html

Also, check out the American Wood Protection Association page:

http://www.awpa.com/

My understanding is that most PT lumber should have hot dipped galv. (HDG) connectors at a min. but that significant corrosion will occur (probably not to failure but I wouldn't like it). Thus, the reason for stainless.

As for the content, I couldn't find anything with a brief google search but I would contact your local lumber supplier, see if they have that. Also, they might use a different preservative such a Micronized Copper Quaternary (MCQ) or specify that they use ACQ with no ammonia (both result in a med. corrosive level which according to simpson require only HDG).

RE: ACQ preservative and galvanized vs. stainless stell

Oh, and contact your local simpson supplier for quotes on the cost difference. If it's only a few connectors then it wont be much, otherwise it could get expensive.

RE: ACQ preservative and galvanized vs. stainless stell

2
Treated wood can, and should be specified by the Engineer, just like any other building material. For ACQ, typical levels of preservative retention are:

0.25 lb/ft^3 for above ground, non-structural use.

0.40 lb/ft^3 for either above ground structural members or ground contact for non-structural use.

0.60 lb/ft^3 for structural members with ground contact.

A tag should be attached (normally stapled) to each piece of lumber indicating the preservative type and retention.

You mention that the project is on the beachfront. If this is a saltwater beach, use of stainless steel fasteners would be wise, even if treated lumber were NOT being used.

The difference in cost between galvanized and stainless steel fasteners is significant, but be sure to take into account that the cost of ANY fasteners will most likely be secondary compared to the lumber cost.

www.SlideRuleEra.net idea

www.VacuumTubeEra.net r2d2

RE: ACQ preservative and galvanized vs. stainless stell

We deal regularly with USP products and use their Triple Zinc coated products for use with ACQ treated lumber.  Most treated deck lumber is 0.40 lb/ft^3 ACQ.  However, CCA treatment is still used for treated Glulams and marine grade lumber.  Looking in the USP Retail Price Guide available on their website, an 18 gauge, 2x10 joist hanger in Triple Zinc is $1.46, in their Gold Coat (2x as resistant as Triple Zinc) is $2.95, and in Stainless Steel is $11.03.  As someone already said, in a marine environment, you should probably go with stainless steel, HOWEVER, the problem you'll face is that only a small portion of the metal connectors available from USP and Simpson are available as stainless steel.   

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources