×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

switch station grounding- when is it simply a site not a substation

switch station grounding- when is it simply a site not a substation

switch station grounding- when is it simply a site not a substation

(OP)
The recent thread238-222409: Substation Fence Grounding on substation grounding brings up the question of when an installation become a substation vs. a switchyard vs. just some equipment inside a fence.

Obviously if it has a power transformer, it is a substation and needs a full ground grid.

If you put a fence around a high voltage switch, does it become a substation, thus requiring a ground grid and fence grounding?  How about a couple of HV motor operated disconnects and a small communications hut? Perhaps the boundry is if there are fault interupting devices?

 

RE: switch station grounding- when is it simply a site not a substation

I don't see that there is much difference between a substation and a switching station when it comes to grounding requirements.  The main issue is limiting the ground potential rise (and step and touch potentials in particular) and this is a function of system voltage and fault current.

With a large transformer, you may have more available fault current, but it would certainly be possible to have high step and/or touch potential in a switching station.   

 

RE: switch station grounding- when is it simply a site not a substation

(OP)
If it is simply a matter of limiting GPR, then it seems like many transmission cooridors should be fenced and grounded.  A transmission fault would cause GPR at the site of the fault and at the transformer (ground source).  A remote switch or remote switching station would not see any significant GPR.

For non ground source locations, is the need to ground actually driven by the likelyhood of utility workers being present during a fault? Otherwise what is the difference between a switching station, and the nextspan of wire just outside the switching station?

RE: switch station grounding- when is it simply a site not a substation

If the fault was inside the switching station, there could substantial touch/step potential.  

I think you are putting too much emphasis on the location of the ground source.   

RE: switch station grounding- when is it simply a site not a substation

In the typical substation you have transformers that can be a source of ground current resulting is high voltage gradients in the ground around the transformer and as you move out further the gradients become lower.  The fence is there not because of GPR issues but as a means of protecting all the high value stuff in the yard.  On the right of way of a transmission line the voltage gradient during a ground fault is much lower than in a substation and the likelihood of step potential problems is small enough to not place the public at risk.  I wouldn't want to be touching a steel line structure when the line flashes over there or near by, but fencing all structures would be a non-starter.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources