×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

ERW Pipe joint eff.
2

ERW Pipe joint eff.

ERW Pipe joint eff.

(OP)
Is it permissible to perform additional spot RT to increase the joint eff. of ERW pipe to be used as a pressure vessel shell?

RE: ERW Pipe joint eff.

For ASME Section VIII-1, see UW-12(d)and UW-12(e) for your answer.

 

RE: ERW Pipe joint eff.

(OP)
I'm having trouble following though. Another paragraph states it is not permissible to increase longitudinal eff. by supplemental RT.

RE: ERW Pipe joint eff.

WAIT a Minute!!!
If you X-ray your arm it does not get stronger.
And
If you X-ray (RT) a piece of (ERW) pipe it does not get stronger either.

The RT just identifies a bad spot in the weld.
 

RE: ERW Pipe joint eff.

Spot RT can mean 2 differnt things.  It can be spot in accordance with UW-11(a)(5)(b), this gives a seamless section efficiency of 1, where a spot RT IAW UW-11(b) means a 0.85 on the seam inspected.

In your case you would need a spot IAW UW-11(a)(5)(b) to get the full allowable stress of ERW pipe.  That is, the 85% efficiency otherwise it will always be less than 85%. The only way to get an efficiency of 1 in the ASME code is to perform full radiography on the seam or, in the case of seamless sections, spot RT to UW-11(a)(5)(b).

You may even have trouble finding the seam in some pipe.

my 2 cents

RE: ERW Pipe joint eff.

(OP)
Does anyone know if there has been an offical intrepretation on this. I need concrete proof.

RE: ERW Pipe joint eff.


nde3rich,

This may require a little bit of explaining.

Quote:

Another paragraph states it is not permissible to increase longitudinal eff. by supplemental RT.

To begin,where are you getting this paragraph from?

 

RE: ERW Pipe joint eff.

(OP)
B31.3 Table 302.3.4 states it is not permissible to increase the E of type 1 or 2 joints. ERW pipe is a type 2 joint. If you cannot increase the E for pipe, how can increase the E for a vessel ?

RE: ERW Pipe joint eff.

Thanks nde3rich,
I kind of thought you were looking at another construction code.
In your case, you are using the Longitudinal Weld Joint Quality Factor, Ej as given in B31.3 and trying to apply it to ASME Section VIII-1.

ASME B31.3 utilizes Table 1 (within ASME B31.3) for the material stress value (S) whereas ASME VIII-1 utilizes ASME Section II Part D.
What you will discover is that there is a difference between stress values. ASME B31.3 values are not exactly the same as ASME II-D. Thereby eveyrthing else is affected.

 

RE: ERW Pipe joint eff.

The rules within the ASME Codes are not as consistent as one might expect. Always, Sometimes, Maybe, Except.
My pointing out that the stress values were different between B31.3 and VIII-1 is just one example of how different they can be.....and of course it would be obvious that one is a piping code and the other is a vessel code....  

RE: ERW Pipe joint eff.

(OP)
I would have thought the values would be similar if you are going to use ERW pipe to fabricate a pressure vessel shell. My main question was and still is how can spot radiography be used to increase joint E. to 1. I always thought full radiography was the only way to obtain and E of 1.

RE: ERW Pipe joint eff.

Closely read paragraphs UW-12(a), UW-12(a), (d), and (e) with reference to UW-11(a)(5).

By performing the additional spot RT mentioned in these paragraphs you increase the relevant JE to "1". But the additional RT is not performed on the seam which obtains the "1" but on the seam that crosses said seam (or seamless shell). The additional spot RT allows you to obtain the full JE of "1" that the seam (either "seamless" or fully RT'd) is able to qualify for.

RE: ERW Pipe joint eff.

NDE3rich

I was also under the same impression, however this can be done as stated earlier by Code Jackal, reference UW-12.d and UW-12.e  Also note the stress value exception you inquired about.

Simply stated in your case the ERW pipe will be given a JE of 1.0 if the adjoining girth seams (cat B&C type 1 only)  are spot radiographed per UW-11 a.5.b


WBH

RE: ERW Pipe joint eff.

(OP)
To summarize, if you spot radiograph the shell to head seams when using ERW seamed pipe, it is permissible to use a JE of "1" for the shell when calculating Tmin.  Do I have it right?

RE: ERW Pipe joint eff.

Yes, provided that the Category A or B weld (head to shell weld)is not Type No. 3, 4, 5, or 6 of Table UW-12. Ref UW-12(d)

RE: ERW Pipe joint eff.

Cmon, now, somebody should ask the obvious question of what one would use for the weld joint efficiency of a one course ERW shell with tubesheets on either end (as in a Heat Exchanger) As you cannot apply the rules of UW-11(a)(5)(b) or UW-12(d).......anyone???....Oh I would ask that you provide a code reference for your answer!!

RE: ERW Pipe joint eff.

WOW!

First - You must use the Code that is mandated by the jurisdiction in which the pressure component is to be installed and operated.

Quote nde3rich:

"B31.3 Table 302.3.4 states it is not permissible to increase the E of type 1 or 2 joints. ERW pipe is a type 2 joint. If you cannot increase the E for pipe, how can increase the E for a vessel ?"

B31.3 does not define "type 1 or type 2 joints".  Table 302.3.4 has several illustrations of LONGITUDINAL seam welds.  Illustration 1 is a furnace butt weld and illustration 2 is an electric resistance weld.  Table 302.3.4 tells you that the longitudinal weld joint quality factor to be used in B31.3 PIPING SYSTEMS, for a ERW is 0.85 and it is not permitted to increase this longitudinal weld joint quality factor by additional examinations.  B31.3 does not include rules for the design of Code pressure vessels.  NEVER mix the rules from various Code documents.

If you are designing a piping system you MUST use the PIPING CODE mandated by the jurisdiction.  If you are designing a pressure vessel you MUST use the Pressure Vessel CODE mandated by the jurisdiction.  You do not use the rules of B31.3 to design pressure vessels.  If you are unsure of a Code rule fly it by the Authorized Inspector who will have to inspect the pressure vessel for the affixing of the Code "U" stamp.

Some pressure component rules allow increasing the longitudinal weld joint quality factor by additional examinations FOR SOME TYPES OF WELDS.  Electric resistance welds are not covered by this rule for good reason.  Why do you not use seamless pipe?

Regards, John  

RE: ERW Pipe joint eff.

Quote:

Electric resistance welds are not covered by this rule for good reason.

UW-12(e) addresses ERW pipe when used as a shell section in ASME VIII-1.

My point is this, when using ERW pipe as the shell of a vessel such as a Heat Exchanger, the efficiency of the shell (ERW Pipe)would be 1.0 when using one shell course and tubesheets on either end. Since there is no Category B or C butt joints associated with the ERW shell that would invoke the requirements of UW-11(a)(5)(b), it is correct to use a joint efficiency E = 1.0 in accordance with UW-12(d) and UW-12(e) when determining the required wall thickness due to internal pressure as required by UG-27 and UG-31.

This is only supported by an interpretation and never addressed specifically in ASME Section VIII-1

RE: ERW Pipe joint eff.

(OP)
CodeJackal,

Do you happen to know that interpretation number ?  

RE: ERW Pipe joint eff.

Interpretation: VIII-1-01-135
 

RE: ERW Pipe joint eff.

CodeJackal is right on the money with that one, I know I learned it the hard way! If you do have a category B or C connecting butt joint, Tom Barsh's post is the one to follow, it is completely accurate.

The E value rules in Section VIII are quite confusing. I have many new Code certificate holders that buy the software package, go to a seminar, and procdeed to use the wrong E value time after time. Section VIII Appendix L examples are helpful here, as always.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources