×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

partially enclosed vs enclosed

partially enclosed vs enclosed

partially enclosed vs enclosed

(OP)
I am trying to determine if my large warehouse I am designing is classified as "enclosed" or "partially enclosed."  There are some very large overhead doors in the project all in a row along one wall.  Do you consider overhead door so be an "opening?"

RE: partially enclosed vs enclosed

yes

RE: partially enclosed vs enclosed

no

RE: partially enclosed vs enclosed

See C6.5.9 and if you figure out what it says, please tell the rest of us. They could not have written it to be more confusing...

It says holes in the building envelope which are designed as "open" during a wind event. I would hope that during a 90 mph wind event, one would want to close the doors. Are we suppose to assume all doors are open?  

RE: partially enclosed vs enclosed

in my opinion, doors and windows are not permanent openings in a building envelope, even if they are large or there are many of them.   

RE: partially enclosed vs enclosed

(OP)
But what if the doors or windows are blown out?  I have a call into the International Code Council.  I left a message, so when they get back to me I'll let you know.

RE: partially enclosed vs enclosed

A door (or window) is not an opening as far as wind is concerned unless you have glazing and the project is in the wind-borne debris region.  Then the glazing has to be protected or else it is considered an opening.

RE: partially enclosed vs enclosed

I used to think of overhead doors as openings.  But I think FSS may be correct--all of the pre-engineered steel building designs I see call the building enclosed, even when there are multiple overhead doors on one side of the building.

DaveAtkins

RE: partially enclosed vs enclosed

Design as enclosed, the overhead door should be designed to handle the wind load so it does not blow out.   

RE: partially enclosed vs enclosed

The way it was explained to me --

If you consider the windows and doors as closed during a storm, and the building is thus classified as enclosed, the doors and windows need to be able to take the impact.
  
If the storm hits and the openings blow out, will the building be "open"?  If the answer is yes, and you want to design as "enclosed", you need to specify impact resistant doors and windows.  

An alternative in coastal regions (at least in the residential industry) is to have plywood to cover each opening on the premises.  If the builder does not install impact resistant (which they typically don't because of the cost), they must provide plywood to cover the openings before a storm.  
 

RE: partially enclosed vs enclosed

When you compare the strength of overhead doors, even the ones which are supposed to be "hurricane proof", to the rest of the wall system, it is usually obvious that the doors will fail first.  So I am wary of neglecting door openings.  Remember, someone else is designing the doors, and if they fail, there goes your design assumption.

RE: partially enclosed vs enclosed

I dug into this one time with the architectural specs and the overhead door manufacturers. It seems that, at least in my area, they are not designed to the required loads. Check the architectural performance specs and then discuss with the door manufacturer!

I agree with hokie66.  

RE: partially enclosed vs enclosed

I have gotten into this before too. I think the building should be able to be considered enclosed if the doors are designed to take the wind load. The other issue I have debated is whether the doors would be left open during a hurricane. I would state on the drawings that the doors have been considered to be closed during the design wind event for the design of the building.

For very large doors hangar type doors, I have read about pressure leakage and the partially enclosed assumption is more realistic. I think this suggestion may also be found in the ASCE commentary.  

RE: partially enclosed vs enclosed

How can anyone guarantee that the overhead doors will be closed during a major wind event?  Ensuring the doors are closed is not up to the engineer, and I doubt most building owners are trying to open or close doors during a storm to satisfy the engineer's original design intent.

 

RE: partially enclosed vs enclosed

So I guess you also design all buildings if all the windows are open during a design wind event too?  

RE: partially enclosed vs enclosed

Look in the Guide to the Use of Wind Load Provisions that ASCE publishes.  Their examples don't even consider the concept of partially enclosed until the wind speed is 120 mph or above (i.e. wind borne debris).  So unless you have a barn or something with permanent openings, don't sweat the partially enclosed stuff outside wind borne debris regions.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources