×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Sig Figs and Tolerance
3

Sig Figs and Tolerance

Sig Figs and Tolerance

(OP)
Settle an arguement...

There is a dimension of 6.7mm +/- 0.25mm

Ignoring the sig figs in the dim the limits should be 6.95 and 6.45 however since the dim only has 2 sig figs the limits are 6.5 and 6.7.  Agreed?

Now what if you have multiple tolerance?  Do you round the tolerance (e.g. the tolerance become +/- 0.3mm) and apply it to all the dims or do you add them all up and THEN apply the rules of rounding.  (e.g. 2.0 + 2.0 +2.0 = 2.25 + 2.25 +2.25 = 6.75 = 6.8?)

Thanks,
Sean

RE: Sig Figs and Tolerance

The only sound solution is to match up sig figs on tolerance and dimension.  The safe assumption is to add a zero to the 6.7 dimension.

RE: Sig Figs and Tolerance

"Ignoring the sig figs in the dim the limits should be 6.95 and 6.45 however since the dim only has 2 sig figs the limits are 6.5 and 6.7.  Agreed?"

No.  Based on the stated assumed limits, you would be rejecting good parts. If ±.2mm was the design intent, the drawing should state such.
I agree with TheTick.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty. - Thomas Jefferson
 

RE: Sig Figs and Tolerance

2
SeanDotson,

   Significant figure are irrelevant here.  ASME Y14.5M-1994 requires that you delete trailing zeros from your dimensions.  In any case, the 6.7 is a requirement, not a measurement.  Significant figures apply to measurements.

                       JHG

RE: Sig Figs and Tolerance

What drawing standards are you working to?  ASME, ISO or some other.  Not sure it will make a difference, I'd interpret it as 6.70000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000... +/- 0.25000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000...

Can't recal the exact reference but probably somewhere like ASME Y14.5M section 1.6.1

KENAT, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...

RE: Sig Figs and Tolerance

Thanks for the chapter and verse, drawoh.

RE: Sig Figs and Tolerance

I just found out the ref to back up my post, ASME Y14.5M-1994:

Quote:

2.4 Interpretation of Limits.
All limits are absolute.  Dimenisonal limits, regardless of the number of decimal places, are used as if they were continued with zeros

However, off the top of my head I don't know what ISO may say, but I'd expect similar.

KENAT, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...

RE: Sig Figs and Tolerance

(OP)
Thanks for the info guys.   

RE: Sig Figs and Tolerance

The answer is correct for both metric & inch, however number of decimal places is a different thing. In metric you truncate trailing zeros from both the nominal and tolerance value, which means that you may end up with a different number of decimal places in each.  For inches, you must have the same number of decimal places in both the nominal and tolerance value.  That wasn't the original question, I know, but it seemed to be the source of Sean's confusion.

Jim Sykes, P.Eng, GDTP-S
Profile Services
CAD-Documentation-GD&T-Product Development
www.profileservices.ca

RE: Sig Figs and Tolerance

Jim,

You are hijacking this thread. :)  Anyway, I do think your point was covered above in part.  Again, there's no law about this and as long as rules are established in advance, a company can choose to use .xxx .xx style dim'ing for metric.

Matt Lorono
CAD Engineer/ECN Analyst
Silicon Valley, CA
Lorono's SolidWorks Resources
Co-moderator of Solidworks Yahoo! Group
and Mechnical.Engineering Yahoo! Group

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources