×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Killed steel vs. Cast WCB

Killed steel vs. Cast WCB

Killed steel vs. Cast WCB

(OP)
I have a customer who wants confirmaton that ASTM A216, Gr. WCB is fully killed steel.

I can only find the term "Killed" steel in reference to wrought of forged material.

Even ASTM references killed steel only when looking at plate specs like A516 but no mention of it in casting spec.s like A216.  

Is this because the continuous casting technique used for most wrought stock does not lend itself to any other de-oxidation method and therefore must use Oxygen scavenging elements in the melt to "Kill" the porosity?

It seems like the term "deoxidation" is used with cast materials because with a variety of batch type casting processes there is the opportunity for other deoxidation methods like boiling out, argon-oxygen- decarburization, and other techniques.  

Does anyone have a reference that definitively shows WCB as fully "killed".  I'm hoping that there may be a Silicon or Manganese content published somewhere for a 0.25% carbon WCB ( we control WCB to 0.25 max. Carbon) that would meet the fully killed requirement.  

RE: Killed steel vs. Cast WCB

DRE111,

A216 WCB does have Mn and Si limits of 1.0 and 0.6 wt. %, respectively.  The general answer to your other questions is "no".  

There are both metallurgical and cost considerations for each kind of deoxidation melt practices.   Rimmed vs. fully killed are on the opposite ends of the melt practice with capped and semi-killed in between.  There is also vacuum degassing to achieve high purity alloys, but this method is not usually used for carbon steel, except in special circumstances or product forms.  

In a rimmed casting, the continuous reaction of carbon and and oxygen evolves CO/CO2 gas which forms minor and useful porosity which counters the effect of thermal shrinkage in the mold.  On the other hand, a rimmed product generally needs more careful melt practices, slag control and pouring temperature since you don't want to pour the casting while the melt is in a vigorous carbon/oxygen boil, which could cause blow holes threw the casting.

Castings, unlike forgings, contain shrinkage, porosity, segregation and non-uniform grain structures.  Killing the steel  would not overcome these negative attributes.  So you have a little extra porosity, no big deal.  The rimmed product does produce a high quality surface which is important in the cast product.  

  

 

RE: Killed steel vs. Cast WCB

Normally customer request for killed steel because the quality of casting is more better compare to non-killed steel.
Killed-steel means already fully deoxidation. Where if not done this method can cause porosity,highly inclusion etc.
In modern technology, normaly deoxdidation process is compulsary especially for the continous casting process.

RE: Killed steel vs. Cast WCB

(OP)
Thanks to both Metalmeister and Zulsaid.
Seems that the bottom line is the term "killed" does not really apply to castings.  

Everything I've read says "Killing" is strictly deoxidation through chemistry manipulation.  

I also, see now that ASME B16.34 shows A516, Gr. 70 as an equlivalent plate form of A216, Gr. WCB

If it's strictly chemistry, then I can see why the grades are equivalent.

RE: Killed steel vs. Cast WCB

Quote:

Seems that the bottom line is the term "killed" does not really apply to castings.

This is not entirely correct. You can specify fully killed castings under this specification under a specific melting and refining process. It is up to the purchaser, read ASME SA 703.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources