×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Head loss - Parallel pipes

Head loss - Parallel pipes

Head loss - Parallel pipes

(OP)
Hi,

This question was already debated too much times in thsi forum, but i still doesn't understand one thing that questions all that i've learned until now.

In series pipes, everyone knows that to determine the head loss we have to sum all the head losses of each consumer.
But in parallel flow, i've red every kind of possibilities to solve this problem.

I've red a lot that if we have for example 5 consumer that have the same pressure loss (for example solar collectors), the total head loss is equal to the head loss of 1 collector. But in other books i red that to determine the pressure loss in parallel flow, we have to make some kind of simillarity to electronics. So in this case some books refer:

1/Rtotal = 1/R1 + 1/R2 + 1/r3 + ...

So, how do we solve this simple problem that many books solve them differently.

I've attached an image to show an example.

Thanks!
 

RE: Head loss - Parallel pipes

No no no.

When in series, head losses can be different in each component and you can add the head losses, but flow through each component is equal.

When in parallel, flows proportion through all components, such that the head loss between any common points are equal, thus flows change and head loss is equal.



in this diagram you know the values of,  Cv1, Cv2, Cv3, Cv4
assume n = 1/2 (or some other appropriate fraction according to your particular head loss vs flow equation)
You also get to assume one value of head, lets say we know the head at B = 10.

The head losses, dH are,

dHab = dHcd+dHdb3 = dHcd+dHdb4

Now just proportion all flows to make the above true.

 

"If everything seems under control, you're just not moving fast enough."
- Mario Andretti- When asked about transient hydraulics
http://virtualpipeline.spaces.msn.com

 

RE: Head loss - Parallel pipes

(OP)
So, according to you, the example that i've attached that is related to solar pannels, the head loss is equal to the head loss of 1 collector and not that relation that i've mentioned, that has simillarities to electronics...

I must refer that this way of calculation is the one that i've always learned. What made me confuse was the appearance of that relation 1/R = sum (1/Ri) in many books.

Can you clarify to me why does this relation appears in many places, has the explanation for parallel flow head loss calculation method?

Thanks for the time and for the good answer!

RE: Head loss - Parallel pipes

or heat transfer books

Patricia Lougheed

Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of the Eng-Tips Forums.

RE: Head loss - Parallel pipes

The parallel resistor equation is NOT an electrical equation, per se.  It comes from a very simple paradigm; the flow in each leg is inversely proportional to resistance of that leg and proportional to the driving potential, hence,

flow = sum(flowi)
= V*sum(1/Ri)

The effective resistanec of the paralleled system is the V/flow = 1/sum(1/Ri)

I couch this specifically to be, hopefully, consistent with your fluid flow problem, so that in any problem where flow, or whatever, can be described this way, the equation will look very similar.

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Head loss - Parallel pipes

Download Epanet and model it. Epanet is free ware and will enable you to model networks.

RE: Head loss - Parallel pipes

(OP)
Hi,

First, thank you all for the answers!

Biginch, your link was very helpful. I've studied in the pas hardy-cross method but i doesn't use it a long time ago.
To confirm all of this, int my example, because the head loss in esch collector is the same, the total head loss would be equal to the head loss of 1 collector...correct?

Thanks once more.

RE: Head loss - Parallel pipes

Yes, that would be correct.
 

"If everything seems under control, you're just not moving fast enough."
- Mario Andretti- When asked about transient hydraulics
http://virtualpipeline.spaces.msn.com

 

RE: Head loss - Parallel pipes

IRstuff

The parallel resistor equation is an analog to the pipe flow equation but it is not the same.  The pipe flow equation in terms of resistance, k, is P 1 - P 2 = kQ 2 for liquids and P 1 2 - P 2 2 = kQ 2
For gases.  

Parallel resistances are added as follows:

1/√k total = 1/√k 1 + 1/√k 2 + ...

The analysis of k does not lend very much insight to the pipe designer, but if you compare ΔP = kQ 2 to Darcy's liquid flow equation you'll see that k=cfLQ 2 /D 5 , then,

1/√{ cfLQ 2 /D 5 } total = 1/√{ cfLQ 2 /D 5 } 1 + 1/√{ cfLQ 2 /D 5 } 2 + ...

If c, f and L are the same for pipes 1 and 2, the equation becomes

1/√{ Q 2 /D 5 } total = 1/√{ Q 2 /D 5 } 1 + 1/√{ Q 2 /D 5 } 2 + ...

Where:
C =constant
f = friction factor
Q = flow rate
L = length
D = diameter
ΔP = pressure drop
 

RE: Head loss - Parallel pipes

Ya the 1/K thing just gets people confussed when they try to use it with pipeflow.

"If everything seems under control, you're just not moving fast enough."
- Mario Andretti- When asked about transient hydraulics
http://virtualpipeline.spaces.msn.com

 

RE: Head loss - Parallel pipes

Correction to my previous post.

k=cfL/D 5

1/√{ cfL/D 5 } total = 1/√{ cfL/D 5 } 1 + 1/√{ cfL/D 5 } 2 + ...

and

1/√{ 1/D 5 } total = 1/√{ 1/D 5 } 1 + 1/√{ 1/D 5 } 2 + ...
 

RE: Head loss - Parallel pipes

Check out 2500 SOLVED PROBLEMS IN FLUID MECHANICS & HYDRAULICS
It is one of SCHAUM'S SOLVED OUTLINE SERIES
You can follow through & see how just about any kind of flow problem is solved.

RE: Head loss - Parallel pipes

(OP)
Hi there,

Thak you all! Y've understand everything that you all said!
Thanks for the clarification!!!

I have another post with another title, that you may like to give it a shot, because is one of those big stupid doubts that once in a while come to my head!

THANKS!

RE: Head loss - Parallel pipes

Where is it?

"If everything seems under control, you're just not moving fast enough."
- Mario Andretti- When asked about transient hydraulics
http://virtualpipeline.spaces.msn.com

 

RE: Head loss - Parallel pipes

(OP)
Hi,

Sorrey BigInch, but i had a problem with my internet connection.
I've already posted it.

Please, take a look!
 

RE: Head loss - Parallel pipes

A similar topic came up in one of the electrical forums about the usefulness the hydraulic analogy in understanding electricity. The analogy can be very useful but has to be applied correctly. The biggest mistake is equate the wrong quantities like: a pipe is a resistor.

It is true that the flow resistance of a pipe is like an electrical resistor. But a bigger pipe is not a bigger resistor.

I admire Dianad's attempts to develop an understanding of basic principles behind the equations. In fact eqautions are useless without this understanding.  

RE: Head loss - Parallel pipes

A bigger pipe diameter could have a bigger resistance, if it were longer.

"If everything seems under control, you're just not moving fast enough."
- Mario Andretti- When asked about transient hydraulics
http://virtualpipeline.spaces.msn.com

 

RE: Head loss - Parallel pipes

Compositepro,

Your observation that a pipe is not analogous to a resistor is correct.  A pipe has a uniformly distributed resistance and is analogous to an electrical wire or conduit.  A resistor is more like an orifice plate which has a concentrated resistance.

Nonetheless, you may recall that in the early days of network analysis using analog computers, the McIlroy analyzer used nonlinear resistors, called Fluistors, to represent network pipes.  This was done for a good reason.  The Fluistors had the equation, ΔE = R I 1.85, which had the same form as the Fritzsche gas flow equation, (P12 - P22) = k Q 1.85.  Thus, this was a case where strict adherence to the correct analogy would not be very helpful.  I would say that the analogy needs to be applied correctly and intelligently.
 

RE: Head loss - Parallel pipes

Surprisingly no one above stated the simple rule that:
- if the flows in parallel are through equal paths
and
- the head loss though the inlet and the outlet collectors is negligible with respect to the head loss in the branches,
then the flow rates in each branch will be the same.
Please note dianad that the second condition above is unlikely to be true, especially if the dynamic head in the collectors is non negligible.

prex
http://www.xcalcs.com : Online engineering calculations
http://www.megamag.it : Magnetic brakes for fun rides
http://www.levitans.com : Air bearing pads

RE: Head loss - Parallel pipes

Actually I thought I did, although not using your exact words.

"When in parallel, flows proportion through all components, such that the head loss between any common points are equal"

Tells me that, if head loss is equal, flows are equal and that doesn't require that flow losses be negligable anywhere.

"If everything seems under control, you're just not moving fast enough."
- Mario Andretti- When asked about transient hydraulics
http://virtualpipeline.spaces.msn.com

 

RE: Head loss - Parallel pipes

Sorry for using an uncommon meaning of the word collector in my post above: this should be replaced with header.
BigInch, the sketch from dianad has 6 (supposedly) equal branches and two headers. For the flow through each branch to be the same, what I require is that the loss+dynamic head in the headers is negligible with respect to the loss in the branches.

prex
http://www.xcalcs.com : Online engineering calculations
http://www.megamag.it : Magnetic brakes for fun rides
http://www.levitans.com : Air bearing pads

RE: Head loss - Parallel pipes

OK.  That's usually the case.

"If everything seems under control, you're just not moving fast enough."
- Mario Andretti- When asked about transient hydraulics
http://virtualpipeline.spaces.msn.com

 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources