×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Coping and Cost

Coping and Cost

Coping and Cost

(OP)
In a previous thread I asked about web cope depths on beams; comparing the ASI 65mm deep cope to 35mm as used in most of my workplaces. Now here's the really important question. Will it make any difference to cost of fabricated steelwork?

Since I have never had an enquiry from a fabricator about depth of cope I suspect not. Does anyone have actual experience of a case where it made any difference?

RE: Coping and Cost

Sdz
I don't have a specific example for you but fabricators in my region tend to provide costs per ton. Unless there is many instances of your cope I would not expect any difference in cost.  
 

RE: Coping and Cost

With one there is less cutting.
With the other there is more scrap to sell back to Sims.
The cheaper one will be the one that is standard for the particular fabricator, if there is any difference at all.

RE: Coping and Cost

Asking around my office, the cost for a coped-web side plate connection is around 50% more than the same connection uncoped. Like apsix mentioned, the main additional cost is from cutting the steel to cope the flanges.  

I would expect the total cost of the connection to be in the region $AU200-300 (better ask your steel fabricator, I am taking this value from a decade ago, making adjustments for inflation plus the increase in steel price and the ever increasing labour cost over the same period). A Quantity Surveyor will probably be able to give you an answer as well.

I have found in my designs that despite a coped web side plate being more efficient in terms of reducing the beam reaction eccentricity, the connection is generally not critical. I keep my designs pretty standard, M20 bolts, 3 bolts for 300UB's, 4 bolts for 400UB's etc. 10 plate cleat and 6mm CFW. The critical aspect of the design is the weld shear that will increase will the greater eccentricity, but generally I have some capacity up my sleeve.

I wouldn't expect the savings in cost to be astronomical, and there are probably better ways to make the steel detailing more cost efficient.

RE: Coping and Cost

(OP)
I was thinking more that a cope of 35mm could be a problem to fabricate because it is so close to the flange, making it hard to drill the hole at the re-entrant corner of the cope; at least for the larger beams and columns.

The 65mm cope adopted by ASI means that the hole can be drilled clear of the flange and the fillet radius. (However a cope this large does not suit 200mm beams and channels.)

But is that reflected in any cost differential?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources