×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

written standard for bill of material structuring - best resource?

written standard for bill of material structuring - best resource?

written standard for bill of material structuring - best resource?

(OP)
I'm looking for a document to define the standard practices for BOM structuring.  

Typically I've always followed the practice to structure a BOM as the items were assembled in manufacturing to best represent the development of the finished assembly.  We currently have a mixed bag of BOM's sub assy's that fall into two groups: Some are set up as the assembly is made (sub assy's containing the parts that make up the sub assembly).  Others just to group parts together that get used together often in other assemblies that are combined with other parts to make a finished good (IE - subassy of seals, misc mechanical parts, circuit boards, packaging and labeling... that are further put into a higher level subassy with the rest of the parts that make up the real product).  We're looking for a better definition of industry practice as we seem to have made up out own standards often in the past that don't coincide with industry standards.

RE: written standard for bill of material structuring - best resource?

What you describe is good. I have seen various ways, but whatever works for your company. You need Config & Quality Control on your docs. What is your industry?

Chris
SolidWorks/PDMWorks 08 3.1
AutoCAD 06/08
ctopher's home (updated Apr 30, 2008)

RE: written standard for bill of material structuring - best resource?

(OP)
We manufacture/design sensors for fluid measurement and analysis.

Typically we have 10-20 assemblies that are identical other than cable length or other small deviations which has lead to the multiple methods in use.
 

RE: written standard for bill of material structuring - best resource?

Generally I'd agree with what you put about "structure a BOM as the items were assembled in manufacturing to best represent the development of the finished assembly".  

However, my current place also has issues, they like relatively 'flat BOM' so as few subassy levels as possible.  Apparantly this helps them with routings etc however it's a pain from a documentation point of view as the assemblies we do have tend to be large and complex so are a bit of a pain to fully detail in a conventional assy drawing.  You then end up needing a detailed assy work instruction and then you have arguements over why you need both...

What you say about having 20 almost identical assemblies except for one or two details makes me think of - numbers.  Is this something you'd be able to use?

KENAT, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...

RE: written standard for bill of material structuring - best resource?

Yeah, it really does depend on your company (size, industry, etc).  It also depends on what you put into stock.  If you have subassemblies in stock, for example, then those shouldn't be broken down on the top level BOM.  Also, if you are maintaining 3D CAD files, you should keep their structure in mind and now that impacts the form/fit/function of hte product.  I've seen situations where Manufacturing will flatten out BOMs (even though they have an MRB system that recognizes phatom boms), which cause the engineering department to lose its ability to maintain revisions of the product 3D CAD models because the removed fundemental subassemblies where no longer being controlled by the ECO process.

So it depends on what you are looking for and how your system is set up.

Matt Lorono
CAD Engineer/ECN Analyst
Silicon Valley, CA
Lorono's SolidWorks Resources
Co-moderator of Solidworks Yahoo! Group
and Mechnical.Engineering Yahoo! Group

RE: written standard for bill of material structuring - best resource?

fcsuper raises good points that I didn't go into detail on.

Generally having what are effectively 'kits' of things like fasteners, seals etc seems to end up causing problems unless they are actually supplied to the customers as kits.

Also bear in mind things like spared sub assemblies etc.

KENAT, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources