×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Steel Box Girder Bottom Flange Access Opening Fatigue Category

Steel Box Girder Bottom Flange Access Opening Fatigue Category

Steel Box Girder Bottom Flange Access Opening Fatigue Category

(OP)
We're designing a bridge per the LRFD specifications.  Our DOT requires access openings in the bottom flange spaced at not more than 300 feet.  For our 3-span bridge this requires openings in the second span.  LRFD says to place these in low stress regions.  Clearly, anywhere in the second span is not going to be a low stress area.  We've developed a ring to place around the opening to reinforce it.  There is a grab bar welded to the ring and the bottom flange.  The ring is bolted to the bottom flange.  The bolts would be a category B detail.  The weld to the ring and the bottom flange would be a category C detail.  Looking at the fatigue detail sketches, there is an eyebar detail which shows the fatigue category on the net section is a category E detail.  Is the bottom flange access opening the same as an opening in an eyebar?  If so then it would be a category E detail.  Fatigue is governing the design of the ring so determining the correct fatigue category is critical.  I'd appreciate your thoughts on this.  Thank you!

RE: Steel Box Girder Bottom Flange Access Opening Fatigue Category

If you are near a pier, wouldn't the bottom flange always be in compression and fatigue not be a concern?

RE: Steel Box Girder Bottom Flange Access Opening Fatigue Category

Assuming a box girder with interior diaphragms at the support, I agree with graybeach about lack of fatigue in compression region near the piers.

RE: Steel Box Girder Bottom Flange Access Opening Fatigue Category

(OP)
Since the opening is located near the contraflexure point, the dead load stress is essentially zero.  The fatigue stress at the opening location assuming there are no holes in the bottom flange is about 2.3 ksi.  For a plate infinitely wide with a hole in it the stress riser is about 3.  This would result in the stress at the hole location equal to 6.9 ksi.  (Since our plate isn't infinitely wide we've done finite element analysis to determine the actual stress.)  If it's a category E detail then we need to limit the fatigue stress to 2.25 ksi.  If it's a category C then we need to limit the stress to 5.00 ksi.  As you've indirectly indicated, the solution might be to move the opening closer to the pier such that the bottom flange is always in compression.  It's likely doing this will change the governing condition from fatigue to compression.  Doing this (going to a higher stress region) would go against what LRFD states.  Thanks for your thoughts!

RE: Steel Box Girder Bottom Flange Access Opening Fatigue Category

The Canadian Code (Limit States Design) and similar to LRFD for bridges, states that fatigue shall be disregarded when the permanent compressive stress is at least twice the maximum tensile live load stress.

Perhaps you can place the opening in this region.

VOD

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources