×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Unreinforced Masonry in Low Seismic Regions

Unreinforced Masonry in Low Seismic Regions

Unreinforced Masonry in Low Seismic Regions

(OP)
Hi guys,

Does anyone detail unreinforced mansonry these days?

I am situated in what is "believed" to be a low seismic region of the world where alot of internal partitions are generally unreinforced masonry.  

The thing is, 1000km south of where I practice, a rogue Earthquake struck a mining port and killed a relatively high number of people from unreinforced masonry collapse, considering the population of the township and magnitude of the Earthquake.  Similarly, this town was also located in a low seismic zone according to the Earthquake code at the time.

Is it good practice to detail nominal reinforcement for internal partitions, just to prevent collapse and hold the wall vertical in the event of an Earthquake?

RE: Unreinforced Masonry in Low Seismic Regions

My first thought would be, what do the codes say?  

For instance, the UK would be deemed a 'low seismic region' although we do occasionally have earthquakes.  The magnitude is pretty low with most structural damage being fairly superficial (chimney pots, roof tiles etc).  I can't think of any building collapses due to an earthquake.  

In the UK most masonry buildings are pretty small and as such are unreinforced.  I have only designed one reinforced masonry building and that was because the client wanted no internal walls hence no returns.

If you are concerned about it, and its similarity to this other township I would discuss with the client.  Raise the safety concerns you have.   Are you happy designing something that you feel could endanger life, especially if you have evidence to support that.

But, on the other hand who is going to pay for it?

RE: Unreinforced Masonry in Low Seismic Regions

Where are you designing for?
No one wants an Engineer to come in and spend lots of money engineering a system that doesn't match what is typically done in that area.  On the other hand, no engineer wants to contribute to mass damage that occurs to an area because the locality doesn't have effective building codes.
My preference is a ductile failure but I would have a problem imposing that preference on a client that doesn't want to spend the extra money for something that is not likely needed.

RE: Unreinforced Masonry in Low Seismic Regions

No reason not to use unreinforced masonry in low seismic.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources