×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Brine flow measurement, non-contact

Brine flow measurement, non-contact

Brine flow measurement, non-contact

(OP)
Our client wants to measure the flow rate of a brine stream (reject from RO/NF).  It's closed pipe on the discharge of a centrif pump.  They say they don't like mag meters but would consider ultrasonic if it's not "too expensive".  I'm thinking coriolis is elegant but perhaps costs more.

Probably a 4" line, 900 gpm (up to 10,000 lb/min).  TDS ~5000 ppm with occasional slugs.  TSS 5ppm plus slugs of filter backwash.  Chlorine (gas) residual 2000 ug/L.

I'm unsure of transit time measurement because maybe there's too much junk in the water?  Doppler?  Thanks for any thoughts.

RE: Brine flow measurement, non-contact

Does you client have a reason for not wanting to use a mag flow tube?

RE: Brine flow measurement, non-contact

(OP)
I suspect they've experienced electrode fouling on similar applications.  Usually they're this adamant when they've been bitten.

RE: Brine flow measurement, non-contact

Try CiDra flowmeters. They are non-intrusive and do not require a shutdown for maintenance or installation. Slightly higher side on cost but maintenance free and reliability is excellent. You can look for cidra sonartrac flowmeters on internet.

RE: Brine flow measurement, non-contact

You Say "Non Contact"
Personnaly I wouldn't touch a Doppler with a barge pole.
I have had some success with Transit time where there are no bubbles of gas. Try a portable before you commit to one.
A coreolis should work but your line velocity is high for a 4", it would also be very expensive, good choice where you dont have much straight pipe
The range looks about right for a 4" Vortex meter (a typical has range 30 - 992 gpm) they work well for most liquids but need considerable straight pipe e.g. 20/10 Diameters for good accuracy.
Let us know how you get on.
Regards
Roy

RE: Brine flow measurement, non-contact

A magmeter with Ti electrodes and grounding rings would work good for this application.  We use this on our brine feed to our electrolyzers.  Don't forget material selection and grounding is very important for the magmeter to work properly and resist corrosion.

RE: Brine flow measurement, non-contact

(OP)
I'm doing all I can to dissuade them from transit time.

Turns out a budgetary quote on a 4" coriolis meter is about $50k, which is impossible for a non-revenue generating measurement.

Mag with upgraded electrodes will be our hard sell, although I did find some merit in considering vortex (which I hadn't used before).  According to the Rosemount material selection guide for their mag flow tubes, Hastelloy electrodes should be fine with 'brackish' water.  Thanks very much for all the input.  Flow meters are so particular and it's nice to have input from a variety of users and industries.

NoHoCA
(ME not CE, perhaps I'll redo my membership here to clarify)
 

RE: Brine flow measurement, non-contact

NoHoCa,
               A 4" vortex should be less than $3,000. They are very reliable and simple to wire.
The engineering company I work for buy about 100 per year for liquid and steam service.
Good Luck
Roy

RE: Brine flow measurement, non-contact

NoHoCa
If not ultrasonic I'll recommad using V-con flow meter.  Much better then Orifice and Annubar. See http://www.mccrometer.com/

RE: Brine flow measurement, non-contact

I apreciate that experience often leads us to make rational decisions, but my experience of current time of flight and even dopplar devices is that modern devices are head and shoulders above similar technology of 5 yrs ago. so my opinion has changed with time.

I would suggest hiring a trial unit of whatever technology you go for, and not get sucked by manufacture's claims.

A new non intrusive device which may overcome the issue of bubbles and solids is a time of flight/doppler hybrid. http://sciencelinks.jp/j-east/article/200703/000020070307A0005064.php
or
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6TW2-4K425D2-6&;_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_version=1&;_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=094bbf25230ebddf220e18a51b42999e

I haven't seen it in Usa of europe yet, but I beleive it is available in Japan http://www.fic-net.jp/eng/library/catalog/pdf/ECXNO632b.pdf
 

I trust this helps,
Mlv
http://www.coulton.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources