×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Change in Out of Plane Forces on Edge of Plate

Change in Out of Plane Forces on Edge of Plate

Change in Out of Plane Forces on Edge of Plate

(OP)
Hi All,

Recently I modelled a plate with a small amount of curvature - i.e like an aircraft window. It has a uniform pressure applied to it.  Around the edges grounded celas1 elements have been used with stiffness in the out of plane direction only, these elements simulate the rubber window seal.  Rigid body motion is prevented at the center of the plate.

I ran a linear model with 2 different celas1 spring stiffnesses, I had thought beforehand that considering it was a linear analysis I would see the same constraint forces at the edge of the plate, but I don't, the corners especially have different constraint forces - the forces can even change sign if a very stiff spring is used.

Does anyone have a explanation of the reasons behind this behaviour?

Attached is a plot showing the difference in results.

Thanks :)

RE: Change in Out of Plane Forces on Edge of Plate

Your 'constraints' become part of the stiffness matrix because they are springs and not rigid constraints, the overall stiffness of the structure changes, therefore the reactions change.

RE: Change in Out of Plane Forces on Edge of Plate

You would only see unchanging reaction forces if the plate was only carrying memrane tension. Your corner constraints can change sign because your preventing them from moving backwards. Imagine pressing down in the middle of a piece of paper (edges just simply supported), the corners move the opposite way to the force, just like you model shows.

RE: Change in Out of Plane Forces on Edge of Plate

(OP)
Hi Thanks you both for  the posts.

40818 you helped me visulised what I think could be assumed to be happening. To paraphrase I think you could assume that the edge of the plate wants to take up a shape that looks like an arc when the pressure is lifting it off the grounded springs. When the springs are weak the arc shaped edge can lift completely off the ground so all reactions are pulling it back into the ground.  When the springs are stiff the middle of the arc lifts off the ground but the ends are forced into contact with the ground - revering the sign of the constraint forces.  I have drawn a quick sketch to illustrate.

gwolf2, while I am not expert in FEM theory, I think you can have situations where the stiffness matrix changes and the reactions do not change.  For instance a beam with gounded springs at each end under a uniform running load, if the spring stiffness was doubled the reactions would still be the same but the stiffness matrix would have changed.  It was thinking along this line that lead me to my initial incorrect thinking about the behaviour of the plate.   

RE: Change in Out of Plane Forces on Edge of Plate

Stezza, your simple example of a beam supported by springs at each end is a determinate structure, in which the reactions at the spring supports is independent of the spring stiffness used and can be easily calculated. Whilst your plate is an indeterminate structure and gwolf2's description is correct. With an indeterminate structure it is not possible to calculate reaction forces without including the relative stiffnesses of all parts of the structure.

RE: Change in Out of Plane Forces on Edge of Plate

Yes, I should have elaborated a little, my response was correct but too terse to aid comprehension. Johnhors' determinate/indeterminate structure point amplifies this well.

As another example closer to your problem: If your window was of constant curvature and the perimeter was circular then your spring stiffnesses would not have changed the reactions. The reason for this is because the structure is of equal stiffness around the 360 degrees perimiter. The edge deflections may change but the edge reactions must stay the same. Of course the symmetry introduces a relationship between all the edge reactions and the structure then becomes determinate.

 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources