×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

mechanical platform kickers

mechanical platform kickers

mechanical platform kickers

(OP)
I'm designing a mechanical platform sitting on top of a roof.  It's in seismic design category D.  I was planning to use kickers to transfer the lateral load down to the roof diaphragm.  Are these kickers considered an eccentrically braced frame and do they have to be designed and detailed as such?  The workpoint at the bottom of the kickers is the centerline of a stub column and beam intersection.  However, the top of the kickers lands in the middle of a condenser support beam.  Thanks.

RE: mechanical platform kickers

Is it just one kicker that attaches to the mid-point of the condenser support beam? Can you upload a sketch?

RE: mechanical platform kickers

(OP)
Well, let me try to explain. The top of steel of the platform is about 4' to 5' above the top of steel of the roof.  The platform is rectangular in plan (32' x 45') with six posts up from the roof. 4 of the posts are on the corners and 2 are centered on the 45' long side of the platform. These posts do not go down to the ground. There would be 2 to 3 "kickers" per column (1 or 2 in each direction) to get the lateral load of the condenser platform down to the roof diaphragm. I was planning to make the kicker slope around 2 horizontal to 1 vertical. Thanks.          

RE: mechanical platform kickers

I think what you have is an access floor by ASCE 7-05 section 13.5.7 and the R to be used is per Table 13.5-1. That means you would not distribute the vertical seismic forces from the rest of the building into the platform, and you would not use the R value of an eccentrically braced frame or detail it as an EBF. I expect that someone else here is going to disagree with me on this.

RE: mechanical platform kickers

I don't know what you decided to do about this, but the more I thought about what R to apply to the mezzanine the less sure I was. I don't know at what point you would consider a small mechanical platform as similar to an access floor (component) and when the size becomes large enough to treat it like any other floor in the building. If the mezzanine is 1/10 the area of the roof plan, I don't see combining it into the vertical distribution with the rest of the building.

But, does that mean it should still use the same R value as the building and have specially detailed frames supporting it also? Or should it be similar to any other component or partition attached to a floor and have its weight figured into the rest of the entire floor weight, and then use a 'component' R value for the elevated floor itself? I am somewhat perplexed on this one.  

RE: mechanical platform kickers

I disagree with haynep. The kickers need not be detailed as an EBF. I would use an R=3 and no special detailing is required. R value used for Mechanical platform would have no impact on the R value used for the building.   

RE: mechanical platform kickers

where did I say to detail it as an EBF?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources