×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

new MV drive on old motors

new MV drive on old motors

new MV drive on old motors

(OP)
I am working on a project installing a Medium Voltage drive an old induction motor (4160V, 2000HP).  I am interested in hearing peoples thoughts on the different drive technologies and manufactures out there.  For instance, ABB offers a standard PWM inverter at 4160V, 2000HP with an sine wave filter on the inverter output. Toshiba offers a multi-step PWM inverter at 4160V, 2000HP.

Which of these drives or others are easier on the motors as far as dv/dt at the motor terminals?  Are there other manufacturers or technologies that are better? Any other thoughts on the subject?

Thanks for the responses.   

RE: new MV drive on old motors

There's also Robicon. They have a multi-level output. Robicon was bought by Siemens a couple of years ago.

I would say that anything with a sine filter in it is preferred before steep waveforms. Even if those steps are reduced in height. The main problem with old motors is ozone production in voids between winding and stator slot walls. The PWM waveforms produce a lot more ozone than a soft waveform does and ozone destroys insulation over the years.

The problem is that it is difficult to predict what will happen. If the drive isn't very critical (but most drives that size usually are) and there is a big cost difference in favour of it - then I might go for a multi-level inverter.

But I would definitely seek advice before doing that. Like you have done here.

Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
--------------------------------------
100 % recycled posting: Electrons, ideas, finger-tips have been used over and over again...

RE: new MV drive on old motors

(OP)
Toshiba (and probably Robicon) also optionally offer a dv/dt filter on the multi-level inverter output.

ABB drive has a SINE wave filter on the output of the inverter.

So I am gathering that dv/dt filters don't get rid of as much of the voltage harmonics as a SINE filter.  Can anyone expand on this?  Any more about the comparison of the above technologies?

Thanks.

RE: new MV drive on old motors

the MV drives that I have worked with
- ABB
- GE
- Rockwell
- Siemens - Robicon
- Toshiba

I think these days all have common mode volage elimination that allow these MV drives to be used on any MV motor

RE: new MV drive on old motors

The common mode volage elimination prevents bearing currents, but does not prevent high spikes of voltage and dv/dt, correct?

=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.

RE: new MV drive on old motors

Got some information in the email which showed I was wrong - common mode voltage elimination does help protect the windings as well.  

My mistake.   Thanks for the info macmckim1  

=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.

RE: new MV drive on old motors

(OP)
Any other comments?  I was hoping for some more discussion.  

I have heard that ABB's customer service is not very responsive.  Any seconds? Any other comments about customer service?

Any other comments regarding MV drive selection?

Thanks.

RE: new MV drive on old motors

Robicon's "Perfect Harmony" drive is specifically designed for this application. The oldest MV motor they have successfully retrofitted was one built in 1942!

RE: new MV drive on old motors

(OP)
I noticed that Robicon uses HV-IGBT technology for up to 10MVA and uses the IGCT on the larger sizes.  

Why don't they offer the IGCT technology at lower sizes?

I was under the impression that IGCTs were easier (less dv/dt) on motors than the IGBTs due to the slower rise time of the output transitors.  Is this true?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources