×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Bending Moment confusion.

Bending Moment confusion.

Bending Moment confusion.

(OP)
Hello all,

I have been given the task of comparing some calculations regarding the stress on a sheet metal flange. The theory given states that the flange is subjected to three forces. One from friction and the other two are as a result of the pressure of oil the flange is subjected to. The 3 forces impart bending moments on the flange and it is the sum of all three bending moments that the stress on the flange is calculated. My confusion is as a result of the calculations sheet I was given that shows the three separate bending moments with units of Nmm/mm? As far as I understood, a bending moment had the units of the applied force and a distance such as Nm or Nmm. Can anyone shed any light on what the units Nmm/mm refer to in the case of a bending moment?    

RE: Bending Moment confusion.

I would assume it is the bending moment per unit length of flange, Newton-millimeter per millimeter of length.

RE: Bending Moment confusion.

It looks like the calculation sheet is based on a "per unit length" of metal flange...it is probably making a "plane stress" assumption for it's calculations and using the associated plane stress equations.

RE: Bending Moment confusion.

or it could be out of an FE program ... NASTRAN reports plate bending moments as moment/thickness (= Nmm/mm)

RE: Bending Moment confusion.

sumo70,

   Warning!

   A Newton is a derived unit.  The units it is derived from are kilograms, meters and seconds.  Do not use millimeters in expressions involving Newtons.

   In your expression above, the millimeters cancel out, but this is still bad practise.  A "correct" torque unit would be N.mm, which creates a good chance of a three order of magnitude error.

                     JHG

RE: Bending Moment confusion.

Hmm, now translate that comment into traditional units.

Almost every car company I have worked in has used N and mm quite happily for FEA and real world test data.



 

Cheers

Greg Locock

SIG:Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: Bending Moment confusion.

Correct Greg,
Designing pressure vessels in Australia, using N and mm in formulae conveniently yielded MPa.

RE: Bending Moment confusion.

i took it as abit of a "rant", but i think drawoh has a point about mixing units ... the number of times i've seen "g" as 32.17 in a model in "inch" units.

but then drawoh says "the correct unit for torque is N.mm" ... i'll assume he meant "N.m" and up it down to keboard stammer.

anyways i thin N.mm is a prefectly valid unit for torque ... it implies that some thought when into the definition (a force in N and a distance in mm).  i quite happily (if misbegottenly ??) use N.mm^2 for stress, and interchange this with MPa.

RE: Bending Moment confusion.

rb1957,

   Note that I placed the word "correct" in quotes.  I was pointing out that N.mm is a better unit for torque than N.mm/mm.  

   I think you are relying on the FEA software to convert everything into standard units of some sort, probably meters.  I was trying to do McCauley's double integration method at one time using N and mm.  Values of x2 and x3 yielded some interesting results.

   You can mix inches and feet in English units to your heart's content, as long as you methodically do a unit balance and convert everything.  The derived English unit is slugs, and I cannot remember if this is based on pounds or feet.  It is so much easier and safer to replace m with w/g.

                         JHG

RE: Bending Moment confusion.

N.mm/mm is not the dimension for torque (as i'm sure you know).  a (the ?) problem with N/mm is what dimension has been used ... in "normal" calcs it would be a length, in some FE programs it is thickness (and oddly enough it's still called "moment").

i agree you can mix units to your hearts content, so long as you either ...
are very careful, or
happy to live with chaos

RE: Bending Moment confusion.

To be honest, I can't think of any reason not to use millimeters with newtons, regardless of whether it's a derived unit or not.

In usage, I generally associate "moment" with beam bending and "torque" with twisting of a shaft, although there's not necessarily a rigid distinction there.  But in plate and shell bending problems, it is normal to derive the bending moment per unit length.  The units technically cancel, but are usually left uncanceled to show that it is a moment per length, rather than a force.  Similarly, membrane forces will be calculated as force per unit length, rather than just force.

RE: Bending Moment confusion.

JStephen,

   If you multiply force in Newtons by length in millimeters, you get valid units, used on a lot of torque wrenches.  If you multiply by length in millimeters again, you get a unit conversion, as noted above.  Multiply once more, you get another unit conversion.  Double integration beam analysis has at least two ways of elevating units to a fourth power.  

   A Newton equals a kg.m/s2.  You are multiplying meters by millimeters.  

                             JHG

RE: Bending Moment confusion.

If I were Sumo70, I would be thoroughly confused by all these "answers" to a simple quiry that that was thoroughly answered by Jstephen's response.

The guy/gal probably wanted to understand how Nmm/mm should be called moment when it looks like the the mm's cancel out dimensionally and you are left with a force, not a moment.
All those extraneous responses don't help that understanding.

Now we all know, the practical application is to simply take the numerical value of that Nmm/mm input and apply it to  a 1 mm length of that flange.
 

RE: Bending Moment confusion.

zekeman,  i think you need to be careful about which length dimension has been used ... length, width, or thickness

sumo70, can you give us a clue ... is it something out of an FE program (which i think would tend to be thickness) or is it a running load ?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources