×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Electricity from air at 250¦C

Electricity from air at 250¦C

Electricity from air at 250¦C

(OP)
Hello, I am going back to the basics with my question:

- let us assume we have flue gas at 250°,
- let us assume its composition is nearly that of air,
- let us assume the cold source is at 25°C,
- let us finally assume this stream carries an enthalpy-power of 10 MW (calculated from 250°C to 25°C)

I have these back-to-the-basics questions:

- what is the maximum electrical power that could be produced from this stream, how would you calculate it,
- what are the practical efficiencies that could be achieved by using a (simple) steam turbine

I am not asking for an homework, I am too old for that.
I ask because I (probably) made a mistake answering the first simple question and therefore I would like to see what your answers are.
The second question is of practical interrest for me today.

Thanks anyway,

Michel
 

RE: Electricity from air at 250¦C

Start with the Carnot Cycle.


 

RE: Electricity from air at 250¦C

For the steam turbine, look at the Rankine cycle.  But you might want to look at a Stirling cycle engine also.

RE: Electricity from air at 250¦C

First, you need to calculate how much steam you could make.

10 MW is 34,000,000 BTU/hr (sorry for englih units).  It takes about 1100 BTU to make steam, so 30,000 pounds per hour of steam at 300 psig and 475 F.  

Going through a steam turbine, you'd have to decide what exit pressure.  Just pick atmosheric.  The efficency could be 50% so calculate the ethalphy of steam in and at exit and subtract. Then cut that in half.  I ended up with 1300 HP or 1 MW.  If you went to a 100 deg F condensing turbine at 60%, you could double the output to 2 MW.

RE: Electricity from air at 250¦C

(OP)
sailoday28, btrueblood, dcasto,

To start with, what about the maximum possible efficiency (and power)?
By "maximum possible efficiency", I mean the maximum efficiency according to the second principle.
How would you calculate it?

Thanks

RE: Electricity from air at 250¦C

Between the hot temp and cold temp, there is no cycle more efficent than the Carnot cycle.
(Th-Tc)/Th  *100   % efficiency

Temperatures are absolute.
Regards

RE: Electricity from air at 250¦C

(OP)
Thanks sailoday28, but I still have a problem.

My hot stream of air is not what we might call a "hot source", since the temperature of this stream can not be constant in the process.
Therefore, I don't see how we could implement a Carnot cycle in this case.
Therefore too, I think the Carnot efficiency is not the maximum efficiency that might be realized with this stream.
I believe that the Carnot efficiency over-estimates quite a lot the potential mechanical efficiency.
When the temperature of my stream drops, the conversion can only become less efficient.
Taking that into account, and assuming constant specific heat, I come to the following expression for the maximum efficiency:

   eff = 1 - T0/(T1-T0)Log(T1/T0)

Numerically, this is much lower than the Carnot efficiency.

My reason for starting a thread here was to discuss this with you.
I am not a specialist in power generation, but from time to time I have to consider the production of power from waste heat. Today, the economic conditions are giving a much better chance to such cogeneration projects. Therefore, I was considering cogeneration for a new plant in my industry. In doing so I calculated the potential power production assuming an efficiency between 15% and 20%. By curiosity I also calculated the Carnot efficiency. And this is when I came to this question.

Did I make a mistake somewhere?
Do you agree with my comments?

I am also still interrested in practical values for the efficiencies for simple steam turbines. Is there a table or database somewhere on the web where I could find some applications similar to the one I am considering?

Thnaks
 

RE: Electricity from air at 250¦C

Lalbatros,
Just going back to your original post, if you are considering a standard steam turbine i.e. water your air outlet temperature will need to be much higher than 25C. In fact it is more likely to be closer to 80C therfore teh effective temperature drop will be 250 to 80C, already a 75% decrease in heat recovery. For practical purposes you should consider Sterling Cycle heat recovery engines as these will operate down to the lower temperatures you are looking at.

Mark Hutton


 

RE: Electricity from air at 250¦C

I guess you have no other use for low-pressure steam than making electricity with it?  That would be my first choice with a low-grade heatsource like this:  make some "free" low pressure steam and use it to displace fossil fuel or electric-supplied low-grade heat sources elsewhere in the process.

RE: Electricity from air at 250¦C

(OP)
moltenmetal,

Indeed, this stream is nearly at atmospheric pressure.
Something like 500000 Nm³/h at 250°C.
I checked the temperature calculations and found it may be even lower.
The payback is never excellent for this kind of project, but I hoped the economics had improved recently. However, it remains that the physical parameters are still the most significant.

RE: Electricity from air at 250¦C

now you want practicle solutions. First off, going below 200 C on the flue gas will start condensation of acids that will destroy the equipment, below 100C and the water will condense adding even more problems.

An organic Rankine cycle is the best bet for success. Pentane is in the range of materials.

RE: Electricity from air at 250¦C

now you want practicle solutions. First off, going below 200 C on the flue gas will start condensation of acids that will destroy the equipment, below 100C and the water will condense adding even more problems.

An organic Rankine cycle is the best bet for success. Pentane is in the range of materials.  google Ormat.

RE: Electricity from air at 250¦C

(OP)
Useful remarks dcasto.

But these flue gas will be deSox-ed.
So maybe it is not impossible?

RE: Electricity from air at 250¦C

You still have carbonic acid from carbon dioxide and water vapor mixture.

RE: Electricity from air at 250¦C

(OP)
chicopee,

I have often calculated the SO2 acid dew point.
I never did the same for CO2.
Would you have a reference for CO2/H2O acid dew point?

I should also note that the stream will be rather dusty.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources