×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Deflection vs plate thickness

Deflection vs plate thickness

Deflection vs plate thickness

(OP)
rb1957 stated in another thread that

"if a plate deflects much more than it's thickness, then it probably isn't working as a plate, and more like a membrane"

Are there any further comments or points to be made about  this statement?    Discuss please.
 

RE: Deflection vs plate thickness

He/she is referring to membrane stiffness, like a drum skin.

corus

RE: Deflection vs plate thickness

Picture a round disc, like corus' example. But let's say its a flat steel plate clamped on the edges. As I put a pressure load on it the plate initially resists the loading (carries the forces) through bending and a bit of shear. But when it does that, it deforms - now it has some curvature. This curvature allows it to carry some of the load through membrane action by going into tension. Just like the threads on a trampoline: No strength until you deform them.

jt

RE: Deflection vs plate thickness

I think we need to go back to the theories that drive the equations that are implemented into the FEA software.  If you recall, "thin plate" theory requires "small deflections" (it assumes small angles for the deformation).  Once the deflection exceeds the thickness of the plate, the assumption of "small deflection" is no longer valid.  The assumptions and theories that do fit are membrane, large deformation, non-linear (geometric, not necessarily material) theories.

RE: Deflection vs plate thickness

If i remember from Timoshenko, that it isn't really the fact of deflecting greater than its thickness, but what the radius of curvature is.
Linear small deflection theory can be used for large deflection problems in many instances. Imagine bending a plastic ruler it remains elastic and easily calculable for massive thickness/deflection ratios.  

RE: Deflection vs plate thickness

40818, linear FEA cannot accurately handle large deflections, since the stiffness matrix assembled by the FE solver is only valid for very small deflections as GBor stated. As a structure deflects its stiffness changes, therefore for FEA to provide meaningful results in a structure undergoing large deformation a non-linear geometry option has to be invoked, regardless of whether the material yields or not.

RE: Deflection vs plate thickness

Yes, but the correct scaling factor to consider is not the ratio of the deflection to the section thickness, it is more closely connected to the angular mismatch of the 'neutral plane' in adjacent elements. A sufficiently large structure made of thin material could deflect by many thicknesses yet remain linear.

 

Cheers

Greg Locock

SIG:Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: Deflection vs plate thickness

Johnors, i didn't think we were talking about FEA.

 

RE: Deflection vs plate thickness

In a linear analysis the geometry is always based upon the undeformed structure. Stresses may remain within yield and be 'linear', but the application and position of the load will change with the deformed geometry. You can bend a ruler and it'll spring back but the position of the bending force will move to reduce the moment as the ruler changes shape. The stresses may well be linear but the load application isn't. Basing the non-linearity on deflections greater than the thickness is a reasonable rule of thumb to take.   

corus

RE: Deflection vs plate thickness

Sorry, no.

To take a simple example:

Consider a long beam. If it is very thin, the deflection at the centre of the beam can be many many multiples of the beam's depth, yet linearity, and FEA, will still work perfectly well.



 

Cheers

Greg Locock

SIG:Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: Deflection vs plate thickness

the analogy i use is a balloon ... the thin membrane obviously has not bending stiffness and reacts the internal pressure with inplane membrane stresses.

if i do a FE analysis of a thin plate, i'd want a non-linear analysis ... i personally don't like linear elements "fudged" for large displacements.

and corus ... "he" is just fine ... "he/she" whilst being politically correct, possibly expresses a dubious gender ambiguity (which i'm pretty sure i don't suffer from) ... sometimes i'll say "he, in the non-gender specific sense,".

 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources