×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Post Tension Garage Layout

Post Tension Garage Layout

Post Tension Garage Layout

(OP)
I am laying out a PT one story garage.  The garage is 180 feet wide.  I was going to use a beam/slab system.  Run the beams for three spans (60' each).  What is a good spacing for the other direction?  I was considering either 18' or 27' but thought the 27' was too far.  Also is a beam 180' long to long to PT? Will there be too much shortening?

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

Span the slab three parking spaces--typically 27-30'. Not too long for shortening they will stress both ends. Sounds expensive what about a precast garage.

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

What load goes on the slab/beam?  Is it cars or roof loads?  As mentioned, precast pretensioned double tees span 65 feet for garages as a standard width for two rows of 90 degree parking and an aisle.

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

(OP)
The garage is a one story with parking on top.  I am concerned about the 180 foot length of beam and the associated shorting.  I know the owner wants to span the slab 27 feet but I was going to shorten it to 18' to keep load off the beam and hence less PT and hence less shortening.  Do you consider the beam to column connection pinned?

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

Is this your first pt project. Can be a complicated system if you aren't familiar with it. Is there someone at your office that has experience with the system. Unless there is some type of height restriction which would limit the beam depth the slab would span at least 3 spaces--some people may go 4 spaces but I think 3 spaces is typical. Don't worry about the shortening--they can stress the cables from both ends. I have designed condo slabs as far apart as 200-250'.

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

(OP)
Actually this is a sister garage to one I did last year.  I felt there was significant shortening and I am trying to advoid it on this one.  The garage last year was the first PT I did and no there is no one in the office to ask.  I did not find it difficult to design and it came out well but I was a bit shocked to see how much it shortened.  The exterior columns were visibly out of plumb.  I used Adapt PT which is pretty straight forward and I have designed concrete structures before just not PT.

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

How much did it move--1/4" or something. As long as it doesn't damage anything it won't matter.

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

(OP)
I attended a PT seminar recently and they stated that you can expect 3/4" per 100 foot of beam so I guess you can expect 1.4" but it looked more then that in fact it looked like 1.4" per side.  What about beam to column modeling?  Pinned or fixed?  Lateral system is shear wall.

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

Beam to column is whatever it is. If poured together (which it probably is)it is fixed. It will generally shorten with the shearwalls at the zero point. Would try to not place the shearwalls at the ends of the 180'. If so then the shortening could be a problem. Generally would place shearwall in that direction (can probably use moment frame for this condition--don't have seismic considerations where I am so don't know if that is a factor)near the center so about 90' of shortening which sertainly is not a problem.

I design mostly flat slabs. On these projects the forming contractor will often place the tops of the columns outward and let the pt pull them back in.

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

I agree that the column spacings should allow at least 3 parking spaces between, preferably 4.  I don't consider 2 spaces between columns a workable design.  In parking decks I have done, either conventionally reinforced or posttensioned, the wide, flat band beams span in this direction, with the slabs spanning in the other direction (across the driveways).

60 feet is normally an unnecessarily long beam span in posttensioned construction, and not very economical.

As to shortening, as much as 60 to 70% of your shortening will be from concrete shrinkage which will occur whether or not you tension the deck.  Posttensioned decks are not the only ones with restraint cracking problems.

 

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

Mauleflyer,

Did you go to the ASCE seminar taught by Bijan Aalami? The 3/4" per 100' shortening is due to concrete shrinkage, not shortening due to PT. For those not familiar with that name, he owns the ADAPT company and has been very important in the PT industry. One thing Bijan said to do in modeling is pin the far ends of the exterior columns. All other connections should be fixed. This will allow the beams to shrink and not induce additional moments into the columns.

What is a good spacing for the other direction?  I was considering either 18' or 27' but thought the 27' was too far. [b]It all depends on your slab depth. At 27' you would be looking at a 7"-8.5". Seems resonable to me which will allow you to have top and bottom steel.

Also is a beam 180' long to long to PT? Will there be too much shortening? [b]No. You can easily stress a 180' PT beam from each end.  

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

Some suggestions for dealing with the problem of your end columns cracking or leaning if you use the 180 foot long beam solution:

1)  The end columns could be brought in, say make the end spans 50 ft with a 10 ft cantilever, possibly tapered.  That would help in a number of ways.

2)  If you leave the columns at the end, make the end columns less stiff in that direction by using rectangular columns.  Would not help the lean, but may prevent cracking.

3)  Allow the floor to shorten before the floor to column connection is made.  You could use sleeves over the vertical bars, force the beam to slide on the column, then grout the dowel bars.

By the way, the advice attributed to Aalami to model the bottom of the exterior columns as pinned really doesn't help with your problem.  May be OK to model it that way, but if it actually works as a pin, that would just shift the cracking of the column to the inside rather than the outside.  

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

(OP)
I like your option in 3.  How do you create a bond break between the beam and column?

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

The beam is still on the form, so not much vertical load at the interface.  You could use a paint on bond breaking material, or even leave the column low and grout the connection.

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

I haven't heard of anyone being concerned with shortening of a 180' pt beam. People do it all the time with beams and slabs.

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

You are correct in that it is done all the time.  But if you do not consider what the shortening due to both concrete shrinkage and pt does at supporting elements at the extremities, you can have problems.  Restraint consideration has to be an integral part of any concrete floor design.   

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

I guess you are right. Maybe I have been lucky so far and hopefully it will continue. The shortening and shrinkage that you are discussing are part of the factors involved in selection of expansion joint layout. I would suggest that the placement and orientation of shearwalls is a larger factor. I have seen this cause problems. For instance if you had the shearwalls at the sides of a building then you could be facing a building that will be trying to move to that side with the equivalent length of 180'x2=360'.

Saw a typical 3 story residential type building with infilled masonry walls and shearwalls at opposing ends. Since it was a short building the wind loading and therefore the reinforcement were light and the pt force cracked the shearwalls.

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

Exactly.  Happens all the time.  I do a lot of investigative work for cracking in slabs, walls, etc., and usually not dealing with restraint is to blame.  Another thing to avoid is very short columns.  Architects like to bring up a retaining wall, then put a stubby column on top, and the columns break off.

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

Mauleflyer,

180' long is not too much as long as the columns are not too stiff, but it is getting towards the limit. You can check for the effects of restraint on the coluymns and allow for it in design if necessary.
20m is a long span and will cost if it is not necessary. whether to use 3 or 4 car spaces depends on the positioning of the columns. If the are beside cars, then 4 spaces, if between cars then 3 spaces is ok.
Whether you do 3 or 4 bays will not really affect the P/A in the beam direction as you would make the beam wider as the bay width increases. And if you use RAPT to design it you might even get the right answers.

All this talk of double end stressing is missing the point. yes it is necessary to double end stress at this length but

The problem is with the effects on restraining members (columns and shear walls) and connections to the floor. The shortening you need to allow for over 180' is probably in the order of
elastic shortening - .1 - .15" depending on P/A
shrinkage - .7"
temperature change - .7"
+ some creep.

So about 1.5" but most of it would occur in an RC slab as well.

 

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

(OP)
All good information.  What size beam would you expect for a three span continous ( 3@60ft) with a 27' trib width and 50 psf parking load?

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

The end spans will control unless you cantilever some of it.  I might start with a depth of about L/24= 30".  Do some iterations to arrive at most economical design.

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

Mauleflyer ,

Hokie66 is about right.
Anything from 25 to 30" could be made to work and about 8' wide for 27' bay width. As he said, if you can introduce some good cantilevers this could be reduced as the end span controls everything.

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

(OP)
Rapt I am a bit confused by the 8 foot wide beam.  In the last garage I used 24"x32" beams, 27' apart spanning 3 spans at 60' each.  The slab (7.5") ran perpinducular to the beams.  Are you suggesting an 8 foot wide beams?  In the last garage I thought the beams seemed big for PT but that what the analysis beared out.

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

I will let Rapt answer when he comes back, but what he is talking about is what we call a band beam system.  2400 wide, or about 8 ft, is a dimension typically used, and it suits plywood formwook, decreases the slab span, and reduces the need for shear reinforcement.  In your case, I might look at reducing this width to 6 ft, leaving a 21 ft clear slab span.  In a 24" wide beam, I would think things would be very congested, and there would be a lot of stirrups, which are very labor intensive.  I haven't done any numbers, just relating how I would look at it initially.

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

(OP)
Hokie, the idea of a band beam is appealing but the economics don't seem at first glance to make sense.  A 6'x24" beam seems more expensive then a 24"x32" beam even though the slab would be thinner.  The last garage utilized the 24x32 and stirrups were not a problem but PT strands were a bit conjested.  Is there any good reference material for PT garages?

Thanks for your help.

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

One of the main considerations for the beam size will be the size of the steel forms that the local contractors have access to. You want to use something that allows the majority of concrete subs to bid the project.

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

Mauleflyer,

I have seen some design guidelines for garages, but think it was for steel framing.

I think the economics relate a lot to what is customary in your area.  My comments have been related to Australian experience.  Thus my first post, as my suggestion to span band beams parallel to the driveways is the way we always do it here.  Spanning over 4 car spaces, about 10.8 metres, we would typically use about 400 deep x 2400 wide bands, with about 16-12.7 mm strands in 4 flat ducts.  Added bars as required with a nominal cage.  All bonded strands, as is required here.  The column spacing in the other direction is about 9 metres.

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

If I understand you correctly you have interior columns which is a different animal. If you have interior columns then you can use a two way slab which is likely the cheapest and best for that condition. The long span beam that is being discussed is for a column free interior.

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

Well, he has three spans, so has to have two interior columns.  Yes, my system uses more columns.  A flat slab could work, but we prefer the band beam approach, and so do our builders.

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

PTI publishes a Guide on CIP PT Parking Structures, a good reference that discusses most of the items touched upon in this forum.

In the PTI design guide they list the following:
Slab precompression 150 to 250 psi
Beam precompression 250 to 400 psi
And to avoid excessive shortening limits of 300 psi for slabs and 500 psi for beams.

Beams spans are common at 60', two 18' spaces and a 24' drive aisle.  Some jurisdictions do not allow the column to encroach in the space so the span reaches 62' with 24" columns.

Spacing columns every three spaces is typical and realistic if the one-way slab is also post tensioned.  If the columns are pushed outside the space, as referenced above, then the bay spacing can be independent of the spaces.  I find this to also be prevalent in precast garages.

Beams widths are typically 14" to 18", as mentioned above they work well with common forms.  I also try to make my beam width different than my column to avoid reinforcing conflicts.  The wide beams mentioned above in my experience are only used when in combination with a shallow 18"-22" beam is required for long span office applications.

The PTI design guide also suggests that the stiffness of exterior columns not be overestimated.  Creep, shrinkage, and temp can reduce the columns stiffness.  Their recommendations suggest doubling the length of the column and only modeling the column below during analysis.
 

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

Mauleflyer,

Sorry about the dimensions, I was not thinking. In most countries around the world the wide flat beam hokie66 and I mentioned would be used in this type of structure along with bonded PT. Overall they are more economical. The structure is shorter, cost of walls, stairs etc is less, ramps are shorter and the slab is much cheaper. While there may be more prestress in the band beams the reinforcement is cheaper and easier to build as hokie66 pointed out. Overall it is a cheaper structure to produce. And axial prestress is probably lower.

Except in USA where you have the standard steel beam forms and never cost any alternatives and believe everything the PTI says.

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

(OP)
mijowe, thanks for the info.  I am surprised by your beam widths of 14" to 18" for 60 foot spans.    I will run some calcs early this week and let you know what I come up with.

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

So I am a little confused on the system that you are discussing. Are you spanning slab beams across the aisles with more columns than a clear span system or are you spanning the slab beam parallel to the drive aisle with interior columns and the slabs spanning across the aisles?

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

(OP)
Lets put aside the drive aisle layout.  The layout is a three span beam (60 foot spans=180ft) and a perpindicluar one way slab spaning 27 feet (beams are spaced at 27 feet).

RE: Post Tension Garage Layout

I was refering to the slab beam layout not the typical pt garage layout.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources