Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Member Login

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Eng-Tips
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

LINK TO THIS FORUM!

Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

Partner With Us!

"Best Of Breed" Forums Add Stickiness To Your Site
Partner Button
(Download This Button Today!)

Feedback

"...Your site is one of the cleanest and BEST forums that I have seen. I have sent quite a few people your way. Keep up the good work!!!"

Geography

Where in the world do Eng-Tips members come from?
mwemag (Materials)
30 Apr 08 12:17

I am investigating the application of gases dissolved in liquid metals for increasing the electrical resistivity of a liquid metal-gas solution.

Many data on the solubility of gases are often specified in weight percentages, (wt%). For example, the solubility of nitrogen in liquid iron at standard atmospheric pressure is around 0.05 wt% at T 1600 deg.C.

When I need to know the fraction of the gas expressed in a volume-percentage ratio, e.g. by calculating the volume of the gas fraction from the wt% and the density per ccm, I get unrealsitic high volume fractions of the gas. Taken the density of 0.00125g/ccm for N and 7.2g/ccm for liquid Iron, then the mixture with 0.05 wt% fraction of nitrogen would comprise (expressed in volume ratio) 25% Iron and 75% Nitrogen, a resulting volume of 400% compared to a volume of pure Iron.

Where I am mistaking, and how to calculate correctly the solubility in volume ratios from wt%?

Thanks for any help.
 
IRstuff (Aerospace)
30 Apr 08 12:31
Primarily, your problem is that you're comparing apples to go carts.  

Gases are NOT dense; they are not solids, so comparing a gas volume to a solids volume is simply makes no sense.

I'm not even sure what the point of such a calculation might be, but a more sounder approach would be to use the atomic ratio and call that a volumetric ratio.

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

mwemag (Materials)
30 Apr 08 13:48

IRstuff, the primary goal is to aproximately estimate the increase of the specific resistivity of a metal in the liquid phase when a certain amount of a gas is dissolved in the liquid metal. The electric insulation strength of a gas is given by its low density, independent of its mass. Therefore, knowing just the mass fraction of the gas in the liquid metal will not help.

I agree that the comparison of liquid to gas volumes in general is problematic, but since I could not find any calculation method for the resistivity versus gas fraction in a liquid metal, I assume that rating the volume fractions of the mixture is the only way to at least roughly estimate the change in resistivity.

The volume rating question could also be redescribed as a follows: By how much will the total volume of the mixture increase compared to the original volume of the liquid metal, when 0.05wt% of the gas is dissolved in it?
IRstuff (Aerospace)
30 Apr 08 14:25
"The electric insulation strength of a gas is given by its low density, independent of its mass. Therefore, knowing just the mass fraction of the gas in the liquid metal will not help."

That's just makes no sense.  A dissolved gas in a solid is part of the solid, there is no remnant of the gas properties left.  

And, apparently, you failed to read my last posting.  I did not suggest using the mass ratio; I suggested using the atomic ratio.  Even at that, whatever calculation there might be will be grossly inaccurate, since the atomic radii are drastically different.
 

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

mwemag (Materials)
30 Apr 08 15:45

Thanks, calculating with the atomic ratio seems indeed promising.

But: "A dissolved gas in a solid is part of the solid, there is no remnant of the gas properties left."

So the solution of liquid iron and dissolved nitrogen would form just liquid Iron nitride (FeN)? Is then the higher electric resistivity in nitrogen or hydrogen enriched compounds never due to the partially gaseous properties? (Nitriding of liquid metals normally increases their resistivity).

 
IRstuff (Aerospace)
30 Apr 08 21:34
The increase in resistivity would normally come from the disruption of the crystal lattice because of the displacement AND the disruption of the Fermi level that allows for the electrons to easily get into the conduction band.

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close