×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Base Shear distribution

Base Shear distribution

Base Shear distribution

(OP)
For seismic analysis using equivilent force method per IBC, the base shear is distributed vertically using equations involving the weight at each floor x the height / sum of the weight x height for all floors. For a single story slab on grade building, this results in 100% of the base shear being applied at the roof level. However, I have seen published design examples where the lateral force applied at the roof level is the weight of the roof + 1/2 the weight of the walls. Which is correct?

RE: Base Shear distribution

If it is a single story flexible diaphragm on shear walls, I take (1/2 the perpendicular walls + roof weight) in designing the roof for seismic.

If it is a single story rigid diaphragm, I think you should take (1/2 the perpendicular walls + 1/2 the parallel walls + the roof weight) when designing the roof diaphragm for seismic.  

I have also seen examples that do this differently than I have stated above. I do not design the diaphragm to take the total base shear that includes the weight of the full height of all walls.

RE: Base Shear distribution

Similar to haynewp, I (and my office) only use half the wall height (plus parapet if present) for our seismic weight acting at the roof.  

RE: Base Shear distribution

Agree with haynewp and tngolfer.  The reason you do this is that you don't need to consider the weight of the parallel walls because they resist their own shear and the load will never reach the roof diaphragm.

You do need to consider 1/2 the weight of the perpendicular walls because that seismic shear will have to be transferred into the parallel shear walls.  The rest goes directly into the foundation.

RE: Base Shear distribution

Similar to MarcbSE, although for a metal stud wall with brick we include the weight of all walls and only ingore the parallel walls if they are concrete or masonry, with the thought being they are rigid enough to resist their own shear, while the metal stud walls wont be.   

RE: Base Shear distribution

strguy11-
I assume you are referring only to metal stud walls that are not shear walls?  Obviously if the exterior walls are sheathed (or strap braced) shear walls they will resist their own shear.

If the exterior walls are not shear walls and all bracing is through braced frames or the like, then I would also include the weight of the parallel walls in the diaphragm shear as strguy11 said.  That is assuming the braced frames are not located immediately adjacent to the exterior walls.

RE: Base Shear distribution

Correct.   

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources