×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

US shapes versus British Shapes

US shapes versus British Shapes

US shapes versus British Shapes

(OP)
Folks,
I have run into a very weird situation and seek your input.

I am designing a fairly significant steel structure in the Middle East and requires sizeable members for the trusses.

In the US, typically W14's are available in a wide range of weights. However, the British sections are very limited in their options.

How do engineers in Britain deal with this problem? For a very simple example, I need a lot of W21x44 and W24x55 for floor beams. The british equivalent sections only start at W24x68 (UB610x229x101) and W21x55 (UB533x210x82)leading to considerable expense.

What is the workaround? Have any of you encountered such a problem?

Thanks

RE: US shapes versus British Shapes

The British Standard BS4-1:2005 lists the 'standard' range.  And you are correct the BS does not have direct equivalents for all of your US sections.

However, Corus (possibly others) do manufacture US section sizes in accordance with ASTM A6/A6M.  These are supplementary to the BS.  I do not know how popular they are but you state you need a lot of them so I suggest maybe you contact Corus.

The equvalents are W21 x 44 = 533 x 165 x 66UB; W24 x 55 = 610 x 178 x 82UB.

 http://www.corusconstruction.com/file_source/StaticFiles/Construction/Library/Sections/ASTM_structural_sections_metric.pdf

RE: US shapes versus British Shapes

(OP)
Ussuri,
I contacted Corus USA this morning and I was told that they currently don't manufacture US equivalent metric shapes because of the economy and exchange rates.

Corus stated that they might start producing but was not definitive about when.

RE: US shapes versus British Shapes

Is it worth contacting Corus Europe (UK or Netherlands)?

In answer to your first question, the get around is to design using the sections available and modify the deaign.  If the smaller UB is no good and the next size up was way too large, it provides scope for amending the structural layout to make it more efficient.  Increasing spans, increasing spacing etc.

RE: US shapes versus British Shapes

(OP)
Ussuri,
Thanks. I will try Corus Europe. However, I found that Corus now manufactures ADVANCE Sections which have a smaller W21 and W24. They are designated as UKB's

RE: US shapes versus British Shapes

Those are fairly new.  A requirement dicated by the European Construction Products Directive.  

RE: US shapes versus British Shapes

There is a fundamental difference that no-one has yet mentioned:

In the us W shapes are used as both columns and beams and the range of weights allows for this.

In the UK the UB stands for universal beam and is as such more for use of beams. There are heavier column sections designated as UCs that are more appropriate for columns. The combination of these two types will give you something closer to the range of the US sizes.

RE: US shapes versus British Shapes

I have not found the British Sections limiting in their options - unless I am missing something the difference in wt between W21x44(at 65.4 kg/m) and UB533x165x66 kg/m and W24x55 ( 81.8 KG/m) and UB 610x178x82 kg/m is insignificant.

As far as Middle East jobs, we did in quite a few cases purposely change from the more comprehensive British Sections to a lesser range of European ( HEA, HEB etc) but that was purely because price and delivery more than offset the added weight. I would say that availability and price usually ended up being more relevant than a difference in weight.

RE: US shapes versus British Shapes

(OP)
xxpegasus,
Are the UB sections you are mentioning readily available? Also, is that section found in BS 5950?

Thanks

RE: US shapes versus British Shapes

(OP)
The reason I ask is because in one of Corus's publications, I find the following footnote.

Dimensions and properties to BS4-1:2005.
These dimensions are in addition to our standard range of BS4 sections.

Does this mean that these sections are available inspite of them not being listed in BS4?

Thanks

RE: US shapes versus British Shapes

Looking at the Corus "Blue Book" (available by the way from their website) you are correct that these particular sections are not in BS4. This isnt a problem in itself as obviously the sections can be used as normal in accordance with BS5950. They do however seem to feature in Corus list "for UK" so I cant really say whether they would be available easily for overseas - Corus UK/Europe should be contacted to clarify this.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources