Waterproofing?
Waterproofing?
(OP)
Does anyone know of a method for using FEA to test waterproofing of an assembly?
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS Come Join Us!Are you an
Engineering professional? Join Eng-Tips Forums!
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail. Posting GuidelinesJobs |
|
RE: Waterproofing?
as i write ... if there is a physical gap in the assembly, you should be able to "find free edges" with your front-end of choice (PATRAN, FeMap, ...).
but of course it's a different question if you're wondering if structural deformation will open up a leak-path.
RE: Waterproofing?
yes, I can probably see what M.Gortner meant... In fact, if in the assembly there is some seal between two components which deform under load, this seal could possibly leak out given the pressure and the deformed working conditions.
In this case, FEM would give the deformed status of the assembly, but then the tightness of the seal would depend on some criteria generally given by the seal's manufacturer and mainly based on "decompression".
Regards
RE: Waterproofing?
CFD....would that allow this scenario:
You assemble your parts (with compressed orings). Then you apply a pressure. You could ramp the pressure and calculate the pressure where the "seal" is broken or when the fluid penetrates your assembly.
RE: Waterproofing?
if your O-ring is a reasonably linear spring, you could run with a unit pressure, determine by how much the compression in the seal has been reduced, and extrapolate to a pressure that would cause the seal to leak.
RE: Waterproofing?
RE: Waterproofing?
RE: Waterproofing?
I reckon a model as suggested by johnhors would be an ok first pass, but for some situations as the pressure penetrates further (say, half way through a gasket surface) the area exposed to pressure increases enough to begin having an effect on the overall separation load.
Just a thought.
RE: Waterproofing?
RE: Waterproofing?
I agree you don't need CFD at all. First, it would be a big deal to set up a CFD analysis in which the mesh must change at each step, if you want to simulate the separation btw parts and OR. Moreover, the initial gap could be too small for the solver engine to consider it "open wall" and have the fluid leak out.
Instead, with a FEA you can do a multi-step contact analysis, as suggested by others, and change the application of boundary conditions at each step (following the deformation of the OR and the parts, the pressurized area will change). If, at a certain step, you find out that the contact pressure has dropped to zero (or near zero), then the junction is leaking under load.
Challenges: correct material definition for the OR (it's a very big problem), steps definition, BC changes = very long and tedious analysis.
If I were you, I'd run the static part of the analysis without OR and compare the relative deformation to the max allowable OR decompression given by manufacturer's tables.
Regards