×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Low Magnetic Permeability when welding 316L

Low Magnetic Permeability when welding 316L

Low Magnetic Permeability when welding 316L

(OP)
We have an ongoing job that requires welding 316L base metal with 316 alloy.  Magnetic permeability of the entire finished weldment must measure less than 2.0mu on a Severn Gage.

Our customer supplies the base metal, we do the welding.  We have had infrequent but recurring problems over the years with seemingly random welds failing the 2.0 permeability test.  The welding and testing is being performed by a competent, experienced individual.  Why is this happening?  How can we best ensure low magnetic permeabilty?

My current theory is as follows:  Magnetic permeability is proportional to ferrite percentage/ferrite number.  The base metal and filler metal chemistry ranges specified could result in an unacceptable ferrite percentage if the Nickel Equivalent is at the low end of the allowable range and the Chromium Equivalent was at the high end of the acceptable range.  A Schaffer-DeLong type diagram indicates this.  Statistically, this is unlikely in any particular instance but probable over the long run.  My first attempt at a "silver bullet" fix would be to purchase only filler wire with very low, but still within allowable tolerance, ferrite numbers.

I will be performing some experiments with 316 filler metals having ferrite content throughout the allowable standard range.  Any advice on weld procedure improvements to try that may help?  Annealing after welding is not an option, nor is changing the material.  

Comments appreciated!

Thanks,

MikeMech  

RE: Low Magnetic Permeability when welding 316L

Can you weld it with alloy 82/182 (Inconel)?  Otherwise, you're on the right track, but watch out for weld cracking.

Gold is for the mistress - silver for the maid
Copper for the craftsman cunning in his trade.
"Good!" said the Baron, sitting in his hall
But iron - cold iron is the master of them all.
Rudyard Kipling
 

RE: Low Magnetic Permeability when welding 316L

MikeMech;
I would agree with your approach, there is not much you can do regarding the welding procedure.

RE: Low Magnetic Permeability when welding 316L

(OP)
Metalguy,

We are stuck with 316 alloy for now.  The frustrating thing is that everything comes out fine 95% of the time...

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources