×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Rigid structrual shape

Rigid structrual shape

Rigid structrual shape

(OP)
Hi,

I would like to ask one fundamental question. It would be great if somebody lit my light again.

Which is the strongest section for same cross sectional area (say for some load bearing frame weldment) among 'Square tube and hallow tube'???

What is the parameter to judge this???

I would be greatful, if somebody help me.

Regards,
mkp

RE: Rigid structrual shape

not sure I understand your question.  Strongest for flexure? Strongest for axial compression?
What is a load-bearing frame weldment?
What is the difference between a square tube and a hollow tube?  Is the square tube solid?

RE: Rigid structrual shape

(OP)
Hi StructuralEIT,

  It seems I posted question thinking only in my prospect.I am sorry for that.

  1.I am looking at a weldment which should be capable of taking good flexural loads (Basically not going to have much axial loads). I

   2. I am trying to find best structural member for my application either Circular tube or Square tube. Which one is better for same cross-sectional area??

What is the parameter to judge this?? I mean how can I know this theoretically??

Hope now my question is clear. Anyway thanks for your response.

Regards,
mkp




 

RE: Rigid structrual shape

Greatest I, (moment of inertia), for the axis in flexure is what you want.  Since the depth cubed is in the formula, try for the greatest depth with a given cross section area.  The W shapes have more strength than rectangular HSS for the same depth and same area.  

RE: Rigid structrual shape

Set area equal to 1, solve for square dimension b and circle diameter d.  Then calculate I and S for both and compare.

Square: A=1.000, b=1.000, I=0.0833, S=0.167
Circle: A=1.000, d=1.128, I=0.0795, S=0.141

The square appears both stiffer.

RE: Rigid structrual shape

... forgot and stronger at the end of my last sentence.

RE: Rigid structrual shape

(OP)
Thank you so much guys, I really appreciate your responses.

Regards,
mkp

RE: Rigid structrual shape

One caveat about wide flanges..

They are subject to lateral-torsional buckling, so the statement that wide flanges are stronger is true only if it is properly braced.

For the sake of completeness it is worth mentioning that HSS members are also subject to LTB, but the span to depth ratios necessary for this to control are completely unrealistic.

RE: Rigid structrual shape

When pursueing a question like this there are unfortunately several things to be considered.  As already stated, member strength loaded in flexure increases substantially with increasing depth in the plane of the load.  So, one may conclude that for equal area, the deepest section always wins.  But this is not so because there will come a point where the thickness of the material will cause the shape to buckle reducing its strength.  This is closely related to the comment about adequate bracing.  With some member proportions the entire shape may buckle.  In other cases, the thin wall of the section may buckle.  Either of these will reduce the strength.

Having said all that, a hollow square will have a greater moment of inertia and section modulas in bending than a hollow circular section of the same depth.  You may want to consider the rounded corners of the square tube as special situations and decide if you want to make an allowance for the residual stresses there.  But, for a given wall thickness and cross sectional area, the circular tube might be stronger because it will be deeper.  A quick hand calc showed me the circle had a higher I but a smaller S.

Finally, I do not think doubly symetric shapes are subject to LTB.  LTB causes a shape to roll over to its weak axis.  Doubly symetric shapes do not have a weak axis.

RE: Rigid structrual shape

Dinosaur-

That's right. It's the same principle as a wide flange bent about its weak axis- it will yield long before you can reach the point of LTB.

RE: Rigid structrual shape

going back to the post on 9th Apr ...

the square tube is going to be superior in bending as it has more material at the extreme fiber (compared to a round tube) and therefore can absord more moment (or produce smaller stresses/deflections for the same moment).

this is easy to show with basic section properties.

but doesn't "weldment" make the problem more complex ?  again, a square tube is going to be easier to weld to.

if you know your load directions a rectangular tube would be better yet (from the same simple section properties, more material further from the neutral axis).

RE: Rigid structrual shape

"Weldment" is indeed a very important word in the OP's question.  In order to develop the capacity of a closed section, the welds will have to be performed with the use of backing bars.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources