×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Insulation for Flanges of Heat Exchangers
3

Insulation for Flanges of Heat Exchangers

Insulation for Flanges of Heat Exchangers

(OP)
The medium through tube side is MP steam and shell side benzene. Channel barrel and shell barrel are insulated but the flanges beween them aren't. I think the flanges should be insulated for heat conservation and even personnel protection. But the equipment engineer said it would be not convenient for maintenance and not easy for finding leak and even increase the external corrosion if they were insulated. It seems a little reasonable and I am a little confused now. Could anyone give some suggestions for me? Thanks a lot.

RE: Insulation for Flanges of Heat Exchangers

Yes , normally the flange connections would be insulated to conserve radiation heat and of course to protect personnel from contact with a hot surface.

Offshore Engineering&Design

RE: Insulation for Flanges of Heat Exchangers

We are a fabricator of heat exchangers, so we see a little bit of everything (everyone is different).  Some insulate the flanges and some don't, but what we see most often is uninsulated body flanges.

RE: Insulation for Flanges of Heat Exchangers

If flanges need to be inspected frequently, the thing to use is a removable insulation jacket.  Glass fibre cloth impregnated with silicone, with a suitable batt-type insulation material underneath.  Held together with drawstrings and/or hook and loop (Velcro) fasteners on the exterior (ie. where it's cold enough to not melt the Velcro).  Insulation companies can have these made for you.

RE: Insulation for Flanges of Heat Exchangers

(OP)
TO DG72
Why are most of them uninsulated? Could you provide appropriate reasons for that from the aspect of design? Thanks.

RE: Insulation for Flanges of Heat Exchangers

The reason to keep flanges uninsulated is that doing so keeps the bolts cooler than the process fluid.  The differential in thermal expansion caused by keeping the bolts cooler maintains a higher bolt tension.

Another reason that I'm aware of for keeping flanges uninsulated is that if the process fluid contains hydrogen, it will diffuse through the gasket.  If there is an insulating cover, hydrogen can build up in the enclosure, leading to the potential of an accident when the cover is removed.

RE: Insulation for Flanges of Heat Exchangers

We don't insulate the exchangers--this is done after we fabricate them, so I am not involved in the decision process.  The reasons for not insulating (that I am aware of) were the ones mentioned by TGS4.

RE: Insulation for Flanges of Heat Exchangers

Chain of events

1) Process engineering specifies insulation on flanges for heat conservation
2) Heat exchanger is installed and in service with insulated flanges
3) Maintenance is performed that requires breaking of the said insulated flanges- If rigid insulation- it's normally damaged beyond repair at this stage.
4) Maintenance is complete and flanges bolted back up without insulation
5) Some time passes..............
6) Energy efficiency review identifies heat losses - potential to improve plant efficiency by insulating all those nasty hot flanges
7) Insulation is applied to flanges
8) Go to step 3)

RE: Insulation for Flanges of Heat Exchangers

Wow TGS4:  hydrogen diffuses straight through a gasket but is then magically retained by a flange's insulation cladding sufficiently to become a hazard?

itdepends:  what are you claiming is damaged beyond repair:  the insulation, or the exchanger?!

RE: Insulation for Flanges of Heat Exchangers

moltenmetal - it sure does, because it's a function of the pressure.  For example, inside the pipe, you have a hydrogen partial pressure of, say, 2,000psi.  That diffuses through the gasket into the area contained by the flange insulation.  However, there the pressure is essentially atmospheric.  Therefore, there is no driving force to move the hydrogen out (short of some sort of osmotic action).

I've collected atmospheric pressure hydrogen (high school experiment with electrolysis), and even a few milliliters will create an unpleasant explosion.

Most of the refineries and upgraders that I've worked at or worked for have specific requirements for NOT insulating flanges in services with high hydrogen partial pressures.  In the course of asking about these requirements, I have inevitably found that this has come about because of either a near miss or an injury incident involving hydrogen accumulation in an insulation "box".

RE: Insulation for Flanges of Heat Exchangers

TGS4:  you're correct that you no longer have a pressure driving force, but you've got one hell of a density driving force for the hydrogen to leave, along with the concentration (diffusion) driving force.

Your insulators are to be commended if their cladding is hydrogen-tight against diffusion losses THROUGH an intact gasket!  

I can see the cladding concentrating gross leakage from flanges, but it would need to be quite a large leak, and I trust your normal hydrogen handling procedures would prepare workers to detect such a leak.  This sounds like another argument for the sewn removable jackets I suggested to the OP- they're definitely more vapour-permeable than aluminum or stainless cladding.  They're also far easier to remove, and far more likely to be correctly re-installed, than clad insulation covers.

RE: Insulation for Flanges of Heat Exchangers

moltenmetal - as far as sewn removable covers go, I think we are in agreement.  There would be enough leakage to avoid such a problem.

However, given the benefits of a cooler bolt, I would still tend to not want to insulate flanges that operate warm/hot.  The additional gasket contact stress caused by the cooler bolts can often negate any gasket creep that may occur.

RE: Insulation for Flanges of Heat Exchangers

When we run really hot service, we seldom insulate for the bolting integrity reason addressed by TGS4.

RE: Insulation for Flanges of Heat Exchangers

Ever seen any rain shields?

Regards,

Mike

RE: Insulation for Flanges of Heat Exchangers

Dunno how many kW you're willing to waste for the benefit of cooler bolting...

We build small plants, and if we didn't insulate the flanges you couldn't keep things hot enough to operate properly.  Then again, the consequences of a leak are less dire.

RE: Insulation for Flanges of Heat Exchangers

moltenmetal- the insulation gets damaged (although I have seen heat exchanged flanges that required re-work because the guys cut the seized bolts off with an oxy-torch.......and cut into the flange at the same time).

Cheers.

RE: Insulation for Flanges of Heat Exchangers

Has anyone run into a problem with insulating boiler ends with extra blanket insulation? I installed it, the paint burned, and people are pointing fingers. It was a large heat loss - i believe either the paint was wrong or the refractory was previously damaged (inspection of the refractory was fine).

Has anyone dealt with this before?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources