×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

BOM Balloons: Part name instead of just a number?

BOM Balloons: Part name instead of just a number?

BOM Balloons: Part name instead of just a number?

(OP)
Like the title says, is it possible for the BOM leader to call out the part name instead of the BOM item number?

I tried convincing our mfg guys that it would not be THAT hard for them to switch the "balloon method" on our drawings. But they will have none of it. They want to have the full call-out on the drawing.I'd like to maintain the automatic-ness of the BOM that Solidworks provides.......


Thanks.

RE: BOM Balloons: Part name instead of just a number?

I have worked for 3 companies and they all had very customized styles they wanted their balloons in. One wanted Part Name, Quantity, Vendor, and Vendor Part Number all in there for each purchased part. 2 of them did not want to insert a BoM in the drawing, so they didn't even have Item Numbers (just Purchased Part info. and Manufacturing Part Numbers/Names).

In a balloon you can easily link one Custom Property, and even a second if you are ok with a split balloon.

A possible alternative is a custom Annotation that "looks" like a balloon. It will be fully associative. You can add those to the Design Library and drag-and-drop them onto your model.

Anything more than that will probably involve API programming.

Ken

RE: BOM Balloons: Part name instead of just a number?

MMike1,

I think the problem may be resolved by employing the use of Work Instructions and Work Orders properly, instead of cluttering the drawing up with all that redundant information.  Are you guys using any PLM or ERP system? If so, under ISO-9001, it may actually create documentation risk to have part numbers on drawings.  Just a thought.

Matt Lorono
CAD Engineer/ECN Analyst
Silicon Valley, CA
Lorono's SolidWorks Resources
Co-moderator of Solidworks Yahoo! Group
and Mechnical.Engineering Yahoo! Group

RE: BOM Balloons: Part name instead of just a number?

(OP)
No ERP yet...not a good one anyway. Working on it.

And I've seen drawings done like this elsewhere. I've worked for 8 different companies, and it's pretty evenly split.

Pratt and Whitney uses the bubbles. Boeing (and related STC vendors), Bell Helicopter spell out the call-outs fully.

ie: NAS1801-3-44 SCREW (3)

It's really not THAT unusual (in aerospace anyway)

The argument is that we have enough issues in the shop without  "forcing" the guy working to the dwg to move his eyes from one page to another. It's one more possible source for mistakes. (Their opinion, not mine).

I do see their logic. But to me it's not a deal breaker. So now the call has been made. I'm done stewing about it. Now I gotta deal with it.

I'll try the proposed solutions above......or more accurately. I'm a manager. I'll have my guy (who is THIS close to his CSWP) do it...and I'll go back to building schedules that will be ignored.

Thanks all.......

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources