Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Random Vibration Spec

Random Vibration Spec

Random Vibration Spec

I have a unit that is one large box (12'' by 9'' by 5'') with two smaller boxes(2'' x 4'' x 3'') on top of it side by side. There is one internal shelf in the larger box and PCBs within.

The smaller boxes have been redesigned. Without testing the whole assembled unit, they (the powers that be) want to test the smaller box. I have a random vibration input profile for the the whole unit, but I need to come up with one that has been translated through the unit to the small box mounting feet.

I have the following thoughts:

(1) Ideally, I would have had the original unit tested and measured the PSD off the top cover near the mounting feet of the smaller boxes. This would have been my input.

(2) I only have the transmissibility(3-axis) at the top cover a slight distance away from the mounting feet from a .5G sine survey. I basically know that it is at these resonances the initial random vibration curve will be amplified. What kind of correlation could I use to compare sine transmissibility to random vibe? I know I'd have to make some big assumptions, but a conservative value would be of help.

RE: Random Vibration Spec

That's a tough one.

You have the response accel data from a sine sweep for the lower box top cover away from the mounting feet of one of the 2 boxes that are mounted on the lower box?
And the top box was redesigned - - - how?  Structurally?  Mass?  Anything that could change the response accels on the lower box?   I assume you are hard mounting the two boxes on the lower box?  

That makes it one system.  

It will be interesting if anyone has a good solution.

RE: Random Vibration Spec

Two circuit boards were combined into one in the top box, but the mass remains approximately the same (~2% difference). The natural frequency of the PCB that remained is about the same. so basically, the dynamic properties of one small board were lost. However, the natural frequency of the board is estimated to be >1900 Hz and the test is 20Hz to 2000Hz (it rolls off to .04 g^2/HZ at 2000 Hz).

I may be able to get a unit tested at 1/2 the qual level. then I can just double the measured PSD at the top box input for a qual test.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close