×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

internal form threads M8 in size

internal form threads M8 in size

internal form threads M8 in size

(OP)
Hello,

We perform many internal thread taps on 304, 316 & 17-4 stainless steels. We have always used a drill, then cut the thread with a tap. We have trouble with breaking the taps.  We have been evaluating a change to forming the threads verses cutting. The most frequent problem is with the M8 tap.

Several different options are available for forming the threads resulting in different cost, fit and depth.

In general, is there anything to worry about? Does it make for reduced holding strength? Does it harden the material on the 304SS. Is it easier to strip? Are they more, less or just as likely to gall? Is there something that should be considered if the part is used in a 200F verses a 450F environment? Since there is less thread engagement in a formed thread is it safe to assume there is less strength.

Thanks in advance for some insight.

Cheers,
MECOMAN

RE: internal form threads M8 in size

What does your tap supplier recommend?
I assume these are M8x1.25 coarse threads since no
pitch is given.  I assume then that you are using
6.75mm drills.

RE: internal form threads M8 in size

(OP)
Hello DimJim,

Thanks for the question. We have been calling out 17/64, that is practically the same 6.75mm.

Cheers,
MECOMAN

RE: internal form threads M8 in size

Yeah, that's an old trick.  Your imperial drill is not the problem for the M8 tap.

It could simply be an operational issue.  When I tap, usually I go one quarter turn, then back off 1/8 turn, advance again one quarter and back off half that amount, etc.  You need a good tapping fluid, Rapid Tap is the most common or some sort of copper coating with anti-sieze compound.

We're essentially talking skinny little noodle of a tap, a guy goes Western on it, you will break the tap.  So being aggressive and not paying attention to fatigue on the tap itself would be my concern.

Good luck with it.

Kenneth J Hueston, PEng
Principal
Sturni-Hueston Engineering Inc
Edmonton, Alberta Canada

RE: internal form threads M8 in size

(OP)
Thanks for the reply.



Curious if anyone is familiar with form threads. This is where the hole is drilled a little larger and the threads are formed in the hole instead of cut in the hole? Pro/con?

Cheers,
MECOMAN

RE: internal form threads M8 in size

In general, there is nothing to worry about.

It does not result in reduced holding strength.

It will harden the material in the threads.

It is not easier to strip.

Galling is complex.  Formed threads should have reduced surface roughness, which will help reduce galling.  You will still need a proper lubricant between the external and internal threads during assembly to prevent galling.

Your temperatures are not problematic for current materials (metal and coatings).

Why do you say there is less engagement?  You can design and produce the engagement you require for your application.  There is no reason why the strength should be less than that from a cut thread.

Regards,

Cory

Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

RE: internal form threads M8 in size

We had good success in switching from cut to rolled/formed threads in 347 stainless sheet.  Reduced the number of rejected parts due to thread problems.

RE: internal form threads M8 in size

(OP)
Cory,

I read that the strength is less with a formed thread. I cannot recall where I read it on my searching of the web.

My mind thought that the material would be work hardened during the process.

My sense on why we have been having problems with the M8 1.25 is that the % engagement is too high. We do many taps of many sizes every day/week. The metric ISO standard are all published with high percentage enagement (90+) verses 75% for SAE.

Thanks for you feedback.

Cheers,
MECOMAN

RE: internal form threads M8 in size

Working from the standard, my calculations show the mean minor diameter for M8 x 1.25-6H to be 6.78mm, which is a 75% thread.

Software For Metalworking
http://mrainey.freeservers.com

RE: internal form threads M8 in size



Thread "forming" as compared with thread "cutting" involves movement of material. You will find a thread which is formed will have a core diameter less than you drilled it - by virtue of the process, no metal is removed - the material you would usually cut has been displaced to form the upper part of the thread crest.

This action also gives a better grain flow distribution as the grain tends to flow along the threadform flanks.

Most (if not all!) standard external screwforms available are rolled thread - the external version of what you are proposing (nearly).

Imho, a rolled/formed thread is always better than cut...


Cheers


Harry

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources