×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

IM fiber in 787/A350?

IM fiber in 787/A350?

IM fiber in 787/A350?

(OP)
Does anyone have any idea how much of the carbon in the new generation of airliners is IM as opposed to the "usual" HS/HT/standard modulus?

We're looking for candidate materials for a civil test program and aren't sure how much emphasis to put on each fiber type.

RE: IM fiber in 787/A350?

I'm not aware of any significant amount of Intermediate Modulus fiber used on commercial aircraft. F-22 and F-35 use mainly IM7 fiber from Hexcel.

RE: IM fiber in 787/A350?

(OP)
Hm. Interesting, 'Pro.

Our estimates show that an upper wing skin/lower tailplane could see between 5 and 10% wt save in IM just from modulus. There are still a few questions over bearing strength and CAI. The tension skin might also have a small advantage (depends on permissable tension cutoff).

Some CAI data show a small advantage to IM; this seems a little odd, as whenever we do simple impact tests IM laminates see higher impact forces due simply to the higher stiffness and generally see more damage. However, we've never been able to afford a decent BVID CAI trial.

(BVID CAI is where you have to do visible-ish damage, irrespective of impact energy (subject to cutoff), typ. 50 thou dent depth. Some stuff, like C/PEEK, resists high impacts very well, but by the time you've done inspectable damage it loses a lot of the advantage.)

I'm not aware of any advantage for fuse in IM, but I'm not that familiar with fuse requirements.

RE: IM fiber in 787/A350?

Wing, fuselage, empennage primary structures on 787 all use IM class fiber (Toray T800).  Same fiber used on 777 floor beams and empennage main boxes.  Don't have any specific info for A350, but would suspect they are using IM type fiber in both wing and fuselage.

RE: IM fiber in 787/A350?

(OP)
Thanks SW. I was aware that Mr B. used a lot of T800/3900 prepreg, but I didn't know it was that much.

Anyone got any idea what the advantage of IM in a fuse is?

As an a minor aside, does anyone know of any aerospace use of Torayca T1000 IM? I'm aware of some use in racing cars.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources