The advantage of a residual overcurrent relay vs a ground fault relay
The advantage of a residual overcurrent relay vs a ground fault relay
(OP)
I'm curious when you would favor using a residual short circuit relay for gnd fault detection (relay 50N) versus a ground fault relay (50GS) and (vice versa.)
I came up with (these are just a guess):
1) 50N requires only one CT on all conductors thus can detect phase faults as well.
2) A 50GS is possibly easier and cheaper to install if the grounding conductor is available from Neutral to the grounded Electrode.
3) A 50GS has better accuracy?
I came up with (these are just a guess):
1) 50N requires only one CT on all conductors thus can detect phase faults as well.
2) A 50GS is possibly easier and cheaper to install if the grounding conductor is available from Neutral to the grounded Electrode.
3) A 50GS has better accuracy?






RE: The advantage of a residual overcurrent relay vs a ground fault relay
RE: The advantage of a residual overcurrent relay vs a ground fault relay
If the system is resistance grounded in the range of 25 to 2000 amps, then a zero sequence (window CT) feeding a ground relay is more appropriate.
JIM
RE: The advantage of a residual overcurrent relay vs a ground fault relay
So here is what I mean:
This is the SLD where I saw this:
http://i48
I did a google on it and came up with this document here from GE called “Relay Selection Guide”:
On Page 21 of the PDF it says:
"51N Residual Overcurrent"
"50GS Instantaneous Ground Fault Relay"
So I started to think on the question: "In application, when to choose one over the other?"
My list of reasoning in my first post was just me brain storming on the possibilities... which sometimes is far from the truth!
Lansford, I thought a residually connected ground CT is a window CT? (Not the other way around, ie zero sequence -> Window CT)
The reason I say this is because in the GE pdf it states a 51N as Residual and the 50GS as Instantaneous. However it shows that the 50GS having a dedicated ground relay feeding the relay as shown in the figure on page 21. The 50N does not (refer to figure on page 20 of the manual).
My notes from class show a window type as one relay over all phases (the 50N?) and the grounding relay in Figure B (the 50GS? Just like as shown in the GE pdf on page 21)
http://i
And as always, I appreciate the input :)
RE: The advantage of a residual overcurrent relay vs a ground fault relay
http:/
RE: The advantage of a residual overcurrent relay vs a ground fault relay
RE: The advantage of a residual overcurrent relay vs a ground fault relay
'Zero Sequence' (or core balance) is used for a relay connected to the secondary of a single large window CT over the three phase conductors or the phase and neutral conductors.
50N is typically used for a GF protection scheme that uses a single CT in the ground return connection of the transformer.
I have seen instances where the 50G and 50N designations have been used interchangeably, though.
RE: The advantage of a residual overcurrent relay vs a ground fault relay
I have made up a schematic of the three:
50N, 50G and 50GS. Is it correct?
http://i4
Maj
RE: The advantage of a residual overcurrent relay vs a ground fault relay
RE: The advantage of a residual overcurrent relay vs a ground fault relay
It trips the same ground fault sensor as pointed to by the 50GS Relay...
I didn't draw it in as it would an extra line going across the page... I just want to be sure I know the difference types of Ground Sensing Relay schematics and there labeling (50N, 50G and 50GS)
RE: The advantage of a residual overcurrent relay vs a ground fault relay
Here is the link again for convenience:
http://i4
RE: The advantage of a residual overcurrent relay vs a ground fault relay
A 50N or 50/51N could be in the residual connection, as you call a 50N; or it could be on the neutral-ground connection of a transformer or generator. With the relays I generally work with, a 50G or 50/51G is calculated residual inside a numeric relay as opposed to measuring the current in through the IN current terminals.
RE: The advantage of a residual overcurrent relay vs a ground fault relay
2) Low voltage breakers tend to have a separate CT around the neutral, and the output of that CT is added to the phase CTs inside the trip unit, so your 50N is closest to what goes on in LV breakers. However, I do not recall seeing the term 50x used when referring to the standard ground fault element in a low voltage circuit breaker. It is just called the ground fault element. Hence, your 50N is not a term used in the application you show, but it exists functionally in LV circuit breakers.
3) In some LV breaker applications, people want an extra sensitive ground fault element, so they buy LV breakers without the standard ground fault element and install a separate ground fault element that monitors a CT that wraps all 3 phases + the neutral. This is what you show as 50GS. I read the "GS" as "Ground-Sensitive" and I think that it is a satisfactory abbreviation.
4) I prefer to say "3Io" when referring to the calculated residual current (Ia+Ib+Ic). This in turn means that in a system that carries a separate neutral that "ground" is Ia+Ib+Ic+In OR the output of a CT that wraps all 3 phase + neutral.
5) In medium voltage systems and relays, there is no true identifiable neutral current except at the neutral of xfmrs and generators, and the use of G vs N for ground is all over the map; they are almost interchangeably. You have to take it in context. However, I think the preponderance of cases tend to use N when referring to a) 3Io current or b) current in the neutral of a generator or xfmr, and G to refer to the current actually flowing in the ground.
6) Manufacturers of relays are not consistent on the use of N and G. The SEL321 and their earlier 121x and 221x relays used "N" to refer to 50 and 51 elements that respond to 3Io, but the SEL311x series they changed their mind and decided to use 50G and 51G for the same current. But even within the 311x relays, they label some of their 3Io fault detectors as 50Gx elements. I have seen the same inconsistency in other mfrs relay lines. Some relays are on the market that have the 3Io calculation and also have a separate 4th CT input, and I think they tend to use In for 3Io, and Ig for the 4th CT input. However, some mfrs refer to the 4th CT input as the "sensitive earth" current.
RE: The advantage of a residual overcurrent relay vs a ground fault relay
Saved in my reference directory. In the near future, I'm sure I will come across this again (time and time again.)
BTW, I got the info to make up my drawings from here:
http://polk-burnett.apogee.net/pd/dvprgo.asp
RE: The advantage of a residual overcurrent relay vs a ground fault relay
Note that your Polk-Burnett reference uses 50G differently than you did. This is the usage referenced by JensenDrive's 5)b).