×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Is Westergaard's Hydrodynamic equation valid?

Is Westergaard's Hydrodynamic equation valid?

Is Westergaard's Hydrodynamic equation valid?

(OP)
Im analysing a caisson structure. the hydrodynamic force on the caisson structure obtained from the transducers installed on it is much much higher than the theoretical value given by the westergaard's equation. can anyone please tell me why people still use westergaard equation for construction at port and harbor facilities? Do they use high factor of safety to account for the actual condition?

RE: Is Westergaard's Hydrodynamic equation valid?

What event occurred or is it just wave action that was monitored?

RE: Is Westergaard's Hydrodynamic equation valid?

(OP)
the earthquake caused the wave which ultimately exterted pressure on wall

RE: Is Westergaard's Hydrodynamic equation valid?

Was there soil directly behind the wall?

RE: Is Westergaard's Hydrodynamic equation valid?

(OP)
yes there is soil directly behind the wall on landside and ocean water on ocean side.
the soil also has pore water in it. Now is there is an earthquuake, will the ocean water pressure on wall, soil pressure on wall, pore water pressure on wall be in same phase with earthquake acceleration or in opposite or some of those in same phase and some in opposite?

RE: Is Westergaard's Hydrodynamic equation valid?

That's not a simple question, as it depends on the relative stiffness of wall and fill, freq content of the EQ, etc.  If the wall is "stiff" (such that its natural frequency is high with respect to that of the fill), the soil and ocean water pressure will be out of phase, such that the fill and its pore water - think in terms of undrained soil behavior because of cyclic loading with high frequency - are being left behind by the wall when the wall is pushing into the ocean.  (That is, the hydrodynamic pressure is highest when the fill pressure, which would help resist it, is lowest.)  It gets more complicated if the wall is higher and more than just the principal mode of vibration is excited, but that's probably not a big issue for most structures.

One question that occurred to be but I can't answer is To what extent you can take advantage of the very short duration of loading from each cycle?  Can you allow for momentary yield a few tenths of a second without failure of the structure?  I can't comment on the validity of Westergaard either, but I've never seen anything to replace it.

Regards,
DRG

RE: Is Westergaard's Hydrodynamic equation valid?

sam002

It appears that you case  looks like Quaywall.
If I recall, there are few papers published in "Soils and Foundations"(Japanese journal). There may be some ASCE Special publications.

Regards,
HTS

RE: Is Westergaard's Hydrodynamic equation valid?

How are you able to extract from the failure that the hydrodynamic is the culprit?

Earth pressure has a dynamic contribution as well.

VOD

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources