×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Looking at heat transfer the completely wrong way

Looking at heat transfer the completely wrong way

Looking at heat transfer the completely wrong way

(OP)
I don't know what I was thinking...

During my recent calculations, I was worried about the thermal CONDUCTIVITY of my vessel wall, thinking, quite stupidly, that said wall would conduct heat away from the product at it's maximum rate, meaning that something on the outside skin of this wall would have to be taking that heat away at a VERY rapid rate, as IR had mentioned a large flow of chilled water or something.  

What I should really do is NOT worry about the thermal conductivity of the wall material at all and instead worry about two things:

1.  stopping convection

2.  stopping radiation

I could make the vessel out of gold and, other than me getting fired, the ONLY thing that would happen assuming I had good convective and radiative blocks in place is: nothing.

-Plasmech

Mechanical Engineer, Plastics Industry

RE: Looking at heat transfer the completely wrong way

I wouldn't necessarily neglect conduction.  There are supports, wires, etc., that cold away from cryosystems.  

As general rule, you do want to start with a reasonable wall material, i.e., NOT aluminum or diamond, do the math on the convection and radiation and adjust as required.  It's almost never a closed-form solution, and there are always plenty of iforgots.

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Looking at heat transfer the completely wrong way

I've found that for large metal objects thicker than .19 inch the thermal conduction of the object is normally negligible when you have a high flux.  One can usually say that the temperature is uniform through the metal at a given station away from the heat source.  For a boiler one can says that the radial temperature distribution of any horizontal cross-section is simply a constant.


Tunalover

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources