×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Slab design when resisting lateral thrust

Slab design when resisting lateral thrust

Slab design when resisting lateral thrust

(OP)
Hello All;

     I'm desingning a propped retaining wall, with the top cast into a concrete suspended floor and the base sitting on a footing with a floor slab "propping" the wall from the side (thereby providing lateral support).  I'm curious about how to design the slab for this reaction.

     Please note: After taking into account friction from the base of the footing against the supporting ground, as well as refining this by doing a coulomb pasive pressure triangle, I'm still left with 15kN/m unballanced thrust taken by the slab.  I don't just want to say that this works by inspection; Anyone have a design procedure for such a situation?

Thanks and regards,

YS

B.Eng (Carleton)
Working in New Zealand, thinking of my snow covered home...

RE: Slab design when resisting lateral thrust

I would check the slab as a deep beam spaning between shear walls. Assume the reinforcement in half the slab(or depending on forces only utilise the 1st 1m depth) is the tension reinforcement with a D (eff) which is at average depth for the tension reinforcement.
Check as a normail beam.

RE: Slab design when resisting lateral thrust

(OP)
Hello Vinny;

     Thanks for your reply.  This sounds like a rational approach, however I was more worried about the possibility of the slab failling by "popping up", or buckling out of plane away from the supporting soil.  Any thoughts?

For the record, I'm fully open to the possibility that I'm worrying over nothing.  Checking as you've suggested coupled with an argument that 2.5% of the thrusting force is easily overcome by gravity on the slab might be the solution.  That and a check for bearing strength of concrete for a 100mm wide bearing surface.

Thus:  
1)  Deep beam check: 6m deep, 12.4m span
 M* = wL^2/8 = 15kN/m(12.4m)^2/8 = 288.3 kN·m
 ØMn = 0.85AsFy(d-a/2) where a = AsFy/alpha·f'c·b
      Assuming the bottom 1m strip to be the tension steel:
      d = 5.5m, b = 0.1m
      665 mesh provides 145mm^2/m, Fy = 300MPa, f'c = 25MPa
      Therefore: a = 20.47mm
 ØMn = 203.0kN·m
      Assuming 663 mesh (As = 205mm^2/m)
 ØMn = 286.8kN·m  
Since 288.3/286.8 is only a 0.5% overstress, accept.

2)  2.5% of 15kN = 0.375kN
Dead of slab (0.9G) = 0.9*0.1m*23.5kN/m = 2.115kN >> 0.375kN

3)  Bearing of concrete floor slab = Ø(0.85f'cA1)
     where A1 = loaded area in mm^2
     (from NZS 3101 Part 1:2006, clause 16.3.1)
A1 = 100000mm^2; Ø=0.65;
Bearing strength = 1381.25kN/m >> 15kN

After doing the bearing check it's probably something I should just neglect in these circumstances!

Thanks again for your help,

YS

B.Eng (Carleton)
Working in New Zealand, thinking of my snow covered home...

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources