×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Thermal Conductivity (k) question, time dimension

Thermal Conductivity (k) question, time dimension

Thermal Conductivity (k) question, time dimension

(OP)
Sorry if this seems like a "stupid" question, but let's say I want to figure out how much energy is lost through a .05m thick aluminum plate, 1 square meter surface area, with a 100 degree K delta T.  To find the energy transmitted:

Q=dQ/dt = k*A*dT/x = 237 w/(m*K) * (100K/.05m) = 474,000 watts.

OK...where does the dt (time) come into play?  Is that 474,000 watts per *hour*?  Here's where I got the k from:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_conductivity

Thanks for any help!

RE: Thermal Conductivity (k) question, time dimension

watts is really Jouls/sec which is BTU/HR and Cal/sec

Tobalcane
"If you avoid failure, you also avoid success."

RE: Thermal Conductivity (k) question, time dimension

(OP)
Ah...well that would explain that now wouldn't it!  Thanks guys.  

RE: Thermal Conductivity (k) question, time dimension

darn SI units!  Messes up everythin...:+)

Tobalcane
"If you avoid failure, you also avoid success."

RE: Thermal Conductivity (k) question, time dimension

(OP)
How would I convert Joules/second to horsepower?  1 watt = 756 HP, but in my calcs it seems orders of magnitude off...

RE: Thermal Conductivity (k) question, time dimension

You've got the conversion backwards - 1hp=745.7W.  That woudl explain your OOM issue...

RE: Thermal Conductivity (k) question, time dimension


Regretfully, there are several definitions of HP. From the CRC Handbook (77 Ed):

 1 HP            W = J/s
metric         735.499
550 ft.lb/s     745.6999
electric          746.0
water            746.043
UK                745.7

and this is keeping out 1 boiler HP.

RE: Thermal Conductivity (k) question, time dimension

sounds like 2 definitions to me.

RE: Thermal Conductivity (k) question, time dimension

(OP)
So I figured that based on my equation above, I'm conducting [474,000 watts / 756] = 626 *HORSEPOWER* worth of energy out of my system?  Whoa, something is obviously wrong here...

Plastics Industry

RE: Thermal Conductivity (k) question, time dimension

well ... yes, 474Kw is a lot of power.  What do you have that is generating or using that much power?  Usally when you do converstin like this your talking about pumps or electric motors.

Tobalcane
"If you avoid failure, you also avoid success."

RE: Thermal Conductivity (k) question, time dimension

Now that Im thinking about it, why are you solving heat transfer problems when it sounds like your application is motors?

Tobalcane
"If you avoid failure, you also avoid success."

RE: Thermal Conductivity (k) question, time dimension

(OP)
I'm only converting to horspower because that is something easy to relate to.  Not that watts aren't, as in 100 watt light bulbs.  

Plastics Industry

RE: Thermal Conductivity (k) question, time dimension

Hmmm...ok then why do you think 626 hp is obviously wrong?  

Tobalcane
"If you avoid failure, you also avoid success."

RE: Thermal Conductivity (k) question, time dimension

some comments:
> You need to be more careful with units.  Your calculated answer is 474 kW/m^2, not 474 kW.  That means that the answer must be multiplied by the appropriate area.  If you have a larger or smaller area than 1 m^2, the temperature rise will be different.

> Your answer must be caveated by the fact that the contact thermal resistance to the aluminum might be quite high, relative to the aluminum itself.  This would detract from the calculated heat flux capability.

>  It's generally difficult to establish a fixed cold-side temperature.  Unless you're running chilled water at a pretty drastic flow on the other side, the temperature of the cold side will not stay put.  If there's air on the cold side, unless you've got a gigantic flow, you'll be hard pressed to maintain the heat flow.  Even forced air convection would limit you to well less than 50 W/m^2/K, so you'd need a delta-T of 10,000 K to match your calculated heat flow

>  Your comments suggest a slightly misaligned view of the equation.  The equation basically says that IF you FLOW 474 kW/m^2 through that chunk of aluminum, you'l GET a 100-K temperature rise from the cold side.  Note that this is a STEADY-STATE solution, meaning that the temperature rises exists, ONLY IF you maintain that heat flow.  If the heat flow drops to 47 kW, you'll only get a 10-K rise.  If your application cannot sustain that kind of heat output, then that temperature rise cannot exist.  Generally speaking, getting no more than about 5 K or 20 K across an aluminum structure is more the norm.

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Thermal Conductivity (k) question, time dimension

(OP)
Thanks IR.  Actually, in my equation above, I did in fact take ito account the 1.6 sq. meters, I just forgot to type it on the actual forum post.

I guess I need to estimate the temperature of the air in contact with the vessel wall on the outside.  Maybe 150F.

Plastics Industry

RE: Thermal Conductivity (k) question, time dimension

Basically, heat transfer is often viewed as a series resistance problem, with process-wall, wall-heatsink, heatsink-air, etc., thermal resistances.  Aluminum, being highly thermally conductive, has a very LOW thermal resistance, so the overall thermal resistance is rarely affected by the bulk thermal resistance of the aluminum.  Most good designs wind up being limited by the last step of the thermal resistance, that of the convection to air, because that's the hardest one to overcome.

TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Thermal Conductivity (k) question, time dimension

(OP)
IR: could you look at my vacuum resistivity quesion?  Thanks!

Plastics Industry

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources