×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Surfacing - Two Guides and Profile - Air Foil

Surfacing - Two Guides and Profile - Air Foil

Surfacing - Two Guides and Profile - Air Foil

(OP)
I'm having trouble creating an air foil type surface.  

I've attached three different pictures.  The first two are almost there.  You'll notice that the first two are the same except the order in which the guides were picked and the third one completely failed.





All of the guide curves are compound radii that are all tangent and also is the profile.  Any suggestions of methods to create this surface?

Thanks

RE: Surfacing - Two Guides and Profile - Air Foil

what are you using for the spine? the Y-axis seems the most appropriate, but that not what the first two pictures show

RE: Surfacing - Two Guides and Profile - Air Foil

(OP)
The spine, by default, picked the first guide curve.  I don't fully understand how to choose a spine.  I'm out of ideas..

I am also trying to use a blend.

RE: Surfacing - Two Guides and Profile - Air Foil

(OP)


I have created it with a multi-sections, but It's tricky to close the end of the small end of the surface...A blend?

RE: Surfacing - Two Guides and Profile - Air Foil

for this one thing that needs to be checked is the continuity of the u and v parameters between the surfaces that you get using blend or by any other tool and the sweep surfaces.
try to divide the section and sweep them across the guides individually. you might wanna try radius (progressive or constant) to smooth out the leading edge.
good luck

RE: Surfacing - Two Guides and Profile - Air Foil

Either method should work.

The spine curve is important. Looking more closely at your images, it's the Z-axis that runs in the same direction as the guide curves; use the Z-axis for your spine, or make a new curve perpendicular to both section planes. (see the picture that Dreamweaver added in your COE thread)

I'd start by using a FILL surface to close up the tip.

RE: Surfacing - Two Guides and Profile - Air Foil

The two guide curves, a spine, and one profile ran it all the way to where the two guide curves came together. It was accomplished using Sweep, Profile Type: Explicit, SubType: With two guide curves.

If control of shape is essential, Sweep, Profile Type: Conic, SubType: Two guide curves -
Development of a tangent intersection would add a level of control to the compound curvature.

RE: Surfacing - Two Guides and Profile - Air Foil

(OP)
wearvedreamer,  how were you able to accomplish that?


I also did the tip from a multi-section surface.  I needed several guides to keep tangency with the surface in the above picture.. I wish there was a tangency control so I didn't have to build that little wireframe for the tip.

RE: Surfacing - Two Guides and Profile - Air Foil

(OP)
weavedreamer,

I tried approach like the COE thread and created a spine.  I have still gotten the same incomplete result..the dip did close though :)

RE: Surfacing - Two Guides and Profile - Air Foil

The spine needs to be perpendicular to the chords at both ends.

RE: Surfacing - Two Guides and Profile - Air Foil

           

An interesting case, and not uncommon - it's the last bit that's the problem. There is very little to work with: 2 planar curves that appear to be concatenations of circular arcs. The finished part looks as though it is one half of a neutral airfoil.

It's probably safe to assume that a section near the tip will have a parallel scaled down version of the root airfoil - because we're not told otherwise; and whatever this part is for, whether it flies or is a fin on a surfboard doesn't matter.

I've made a look-a-like model where the 2 given curves are splines; in fact the planar fin profile is a 7-point (degree 6) Bezier curve - because of its natural smoothness - see # at the end. The airfoil section is a simple GSD spline made from 2 endpoints, 2 slopes (tangent lines), and default (1) tensions. What I was after was a 4-sided surface to close this fin.

Why a 4-sided surface? Because that's the best (I think) chance of getting a smooth and controlled closing surface - and, there are no radical changes of slope or curvature in it. The curves of the Cutting-Planes analysis in the opening picture are a clue to the closing surface generation.

In the second and third pictures a support flange around the fin profile is from a previous construction method, sorry, I forgot to delete it.

            

A plane parallel to the airfoil one was set up out near the tip of the fin, and another airfoil section made with the same leading and trailing edge slopes and a Multi-Section Surface made using guides from the profile, and the 2 airfoil sections - as they are on parallel planes the spine is linear. The original airfoil could have been swept along the guides, but it's harder then to alter the outer section - if needed. Then the (outer airfoil) plane offset was increased towards the tip as far as possible. So far, this is a good  surface, that can provide information to make its own missing tip.

            

Then by working inwards from the tip - into the good MSS surface; 3 equally spaced parallel plane cuts were made through the MSS and the main surface cut away as shown - the outer curve comes from the fin profile. There's enough now information to close the fin with a 4-sided Multi-Section Surface: 4-Sections (on parallel planes), 2-Guides and a Spine that's normal to the fin profile plane - all shown in blue. By cutting the surface this way the 4 sections are akin to map contours of a hill.

            

The two final surfaces were then joined and analized. By visualisation methods, interrogation (cuts) and so on, checking slope and curvature. We do have the FreeStyle licence here but I'm trying to do this in a GSD situation. As usual there are other ways of doing this but this time I got a better result with this contour method.

# - Bezier Splines: they can be constructed easily by the 'Creating Elements from an External File' method for use in GSD. An understanding and appreciation of these powerful and smooth curves is certainly an asset, whether the user has access to FreeStyle or not. They are very useful in engineering applications - not just in styling. In the first 2 pictures the green control points, connected by black lines, are what defined the fin profile. This could have been constructed using GSD splines, but I preferred the Bezier method - for this shape.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources