×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Partial Moment Connection

Partial Moment Connection

Partial Moment Connection

(OP)
Hi All,
I have a 6 story steel building. It resides in IBC 2003 - Seismic Zone B, Site Class D.
I am on the east coast in the mid-Atlantic region.

I have a braced frame system to resist lateral forces. However, along the exterior of my building I have a few moment connections to support areas where the columns and facade step to obtain the design "motif" that the architect desired.

However, now I have moment connections in a great position for lateral loads. I wasn't designing it this way until I realized what was going on, and now I'm trying to determine how to mesh these things together. I want to partially restrain these connections in units of a spring constant.
I've found some articles for how to do this in an unbraced frame, but how do I do this in a braced frame?
Thanks.

Rick

RC
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
    Edmund Burke

RE: Partial Moment Connection

1. IBC does not have seismic zones anymore. Do you mean seismic design category "B"?
2. SDC would dictate what kind of moment frame you may use.
3. Moment frames can hardly compete with braced frames from a stiffness point of view. I don't see why you are thinking of modeling partial fixity? Even with full fixity you may hardly see any forces in moment frames due to lateral loads.
4. If your system is not classified as a dual system, I would distribute lateral loads to moment frames based on tributory area.
5. If you are planning to utilize partially restrained composite moment connections there is a AISC design guide explaining how to design.

RE: Partial Moment Connection

(OP)
prsconsultant,
Thanks for the response, sorry for the typos on the previous post.

1. Yes I do mean design category.
2. I'm not actually looking to use a moment frame in my lateral design and I want to see with the partial fixity at those connections if the load getting into them versus the braced frames would be small enough that existing gravity controlled members would be sufficient.
3. I modeled the members as fully fixed and got some crazy results. So I wanted to model it more accurately within ETABS. ETABS only allows you to model partial fixity with a spring stiffness.
4. I am designing my system using R = 3 for a system not specifically designed for seismic.
5. I will look that up on AISC.org.

Thanks again

RC
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
    Edmund Burke

RE: Partial Moment Connection

I think you may be seeing a modeling problem in your etabs. Even with complete fixity I would not expect significant forces in MF members. I don't think partial fixity would make any difference. Verify your model.

RE: Partial Moment Connection

From a stiffness point of view, I cant imagine that the much load is going to the moment frames, since the braced frames will be more rigid than the moment frames.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources