Too many safety concerns?
Too many safety concerns?
(OP)
I am an immigrant in a so-called developed country. I am impressed at the EH&S stuff. More in particular, SAFETY. I know that common sense and knowledge are not as common as they should be, but some of the safety precautions seem just plain ridiculous.
I am not saying safety should not play a major role in engineering. On the contrary, it should be front and foremost. Back home I saw stuff that people here are just amazed actually happened, but it did. (on the other hand, back home you do not see pedestrians being run over by a slow moving train. Oh, and suing the train company)
I am not saying things should be the way they are in sub-developed countries, otherwise I would not be here but:
At which point does engineering stops engineering against stupidity?
At which point is people liable for their own stup... negligence?
How do you show where to draw the line between a possible negative event and chances of an asteroid hitting your plant?
I have had project add-ons that caused my projects to go 20-30% over budget upon an EH&S advisor's unreal recommendation/request.
Things like adding a second set of stairs off a catwalk where a ladder would have sufficed. This is in case the operator that happens to be up there is overweight and might not be able to egress quickly enough. (a second set of stairs. There is one already, the second means of EMERGENCY egress was the laddder).
Installing a catwalk over a 3’ tall berm that everybody jumps anyway?
Forcing to wear a hard hat while taking soil samples in the middle of a farmer's field (I guess in case the sky falls).
Examples are lots but it comes down to: Where does engineering stops and basic common sense kicks in?
(I apologize for my grammar, but English is not my mother language)
I am not saying safety should not play a major role in engineering. On the contrary, it should be front and foremost. Back home I saw stuff that people here are just amazed actually happened, but it did. (on the other hand, back home you do not see pedestrians being run over by a slow moving train. Oh, and suing the train company)
I am not saying things should be the way they are in sub-developed countries, otherwise I would not be here but:
At which point does engineering stops engineering against stupidity?
At which point is people liable for their own stup... negligence?
How do you show where to draw the line between a possible negative event and chances of an asteroid hitting your plant?
I have had project add-ons that caused my projects to go 20-30% over budget upon an EH&S advisor's unreal recommendation/request.
Things like adding a second set of stairs off a catwalk where a ladder would have sufficed. This is in case the operator that happens to be up there is overweight and might not be able to egress quickly enough. (a second set of stairs. There is one already, the second means of EMERGENCY egress was the laddder).
Installing a catwalk over a 3’ tall berm that everybody jumps anyway?
Forcing to wear a hard hat while taking soil samples in the middle of a farmer's field (I guess in case the sky falls).
Examples are lots but it comes down to: Where does engineering stops and basic common sense kicks in?
(I apologize for my grammar, but English is not my mother language)





RE: Too many safety concerns?
RE: Too many safety concerns?
"Art without engineering is dreaming; Engineering without art is calculating."
Have you read FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies to make the best use of Eng-Tips Forums?
RE: Too many safety concerns?
RE: Too many safety concerns?
".. but some of the safety precautions seem just plain ridiculous.. "Behind every safety rule or regulation there are dead people. The cost of the extra engineering and construction is based on how people are valued. It's not what you or I value people most of the time it's up to a jury.
If you design a ladder off a catwalk instead of some stairs -whats the difference? Maby one of a thousand people fall off a ladder and only one out of five thousand fall off the stairs. So you saved money but injured 4 people. Compair the exta cost of the stairs against an ambulance ride to the hospital and the cost of setting a broken leg. Better yet compair the price of a serious back injury. In East Bumhump it may be a clear call for a ladder but not here.
If people aren't important and "pure engineering" is go back. You can build bridges without gardrails, cars without seatbelts, stairs without handrails, etc. Save lots of money, whats a few maimed and injured people??
RE: Too many safety concerns?
RE: Too many safety concerns?
You are right; life is cheaper in developing countries. I have seen it in both. Here, killing a rig hand is over $3MM. There a small check to the family and everybody shuts up. I DESPISE that!
However, there should be a point where people should be accountable for their own negligence. I understand when the design has to be such that will protect people from harm. Especially when a complex process is involved and not just anybody might understand its operation. But when you have to design a system layout in which you are forcing a lazy operator to walk over a few more meters so that he cannot possibly climb over the burner's exhaust... well...
An example I use a lot is pedestrians. I come from the largest city in the world and kids know how to cross a street. Here pedestrians just bolt into the street without looking (not kids necessarily). Kind of remind me of cows or deer on the highway.
What I am saying is that some of the safety precautions are in place because people are too used to safeguards and that, sometimes, makes them too lazy to think what they are doing. Thus an accident will eventually happen.
I do think there is a factor of over protection that is replacing thinking for some people.
For the record, some of us did not move due to safety practices. Some because of a better life style (depending on ones definition but this is an inarguable point, life is easier) and some others chasing edge technologies to work with (which happen to come with a more relaxed life).
RE: Too many safety concerns?
RE: Too many safety concerns?
Seriously,
I suppose this is where you have to look at what the courts call a reasonable person and perform a reasonable person test. It seems like the reasonable person has lost many of it's IQ points.
RE: Too many safety concerns?
A few examples please.
Your first example was of a ladder vs stairs. OSHA and the construction industry has lots of data supporting the safety of stairs vs ladders.
What would you propose for pedestrians? Fences along the sidewalks? Cowcatchers on cars? How about schools that teach traffic safety. I think I first heard that from my kindergarten teacher,things like "Cross at the crosswalk, look both ways, make eye contact with the driver" etc.
Commmon sense isn't that common and never has been.
The other thing people keep trying to do is build systems and machines that are fool proof. It's not possible, fools are continually being prefected.
"Some because of a better life style" Which I would assumes means a safer life for you and your kids. Does their school have a fence around it? Kind of a waste of money if everone would just teach their kids not run out in the street.
Does your house have a smoke detector? It's usually a local regulation here, was it where you came from?
RE: Too many safety concerns?
However, for the last few years we have been running an intensely policed safety culture where I work, eg you MUST wear high vis gear near traffic and forklifts, you MUST walk on the walkways, you MUST wear appropriate footwear.
and guess what? It works. Everybody wins.
Cheers
Greg Locock
SIG:Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.
RE: Too many safety concerns?
But wearing a hardhat in the middle of an open field to take soil samples? There's no reasonable explanation for such a silly rule, unless there is power equipment that could shoot something at high velocity. The items you mention create safety by forcing everyone to follow common rules, reducing what their brains have to process to make it a safe environment. Rules such as mentioned by unotec have the opposite effect, creating rules that force people into situations that are non-obvious, requiring them to think harder all of the time... should I take the ladder or the stairs, should I wear a hardhat when I'm driving out into the field, etc.
Dan - Owner

http://www.Hi-TecDesigns.com
RE: Too many safety concerns?
You just don't set a foot in the plant without a hard hat on. You don't get onto a ladder while someone else is above you. You don't leave any objects on your office floor that could be a tripping hazard. You don't work on any piece of equipment before having isolated it (both physically and electrically).
Bad safety habits at the "base of the pyramid" will lead to fatalities at the top, good habits will save lives. Sorry if I'm sound like an HSE guru, but when I hear my current management complain about lousy safety statistics, while I see people in the plant without a hard hat, without safety glasses, without breathing protection while the environment is dusty, the place just screams for a list of fundamental safety rules... so-called humorous billboards that encourage good behavior, near miss incident reports discussed in meetings, weekly safety tips distributed by email, and everything else I used to get tired of...
RE: Too many safety concerns?
A lot of the rules are there for obvious reasons. I don’t know if it’s the original intent but I also think a lot of rules are in place to insure the habitual nature of a safety procedure. One example: the hard hat in the field. Some places require you wear steel-toe, glasses, and a hard hat, in the “field”. By the nature of the stupid rules, I always put on my steel-toe, and glasses without thinking, when leaving my office. The other day I even put my steel-toe and grabbed my glasses to go to the bank… when I realized I felt like a real idiot, but I didn’t have to worry my feet...at the bank
RE: Too many safety concerns?
RE: Too many safety concerns?
RE: Too many safety concerns?
"Oh good, now I'll wear one".
So, at least for some people, rules are just enough to overcome laziness in safety issues.
SLH
RE: Too many safety concerns?
Don Phillips
http://worthingtonengineering.com
RE: Too many safety concerns?
After everyone gets closer to being on the same page, a PHA is held and the risk is reviewed and documented.
If one group keeps making all the changes, then I stop the project completely and do a 100% from scratch PHA. Then on the next project I refuse to start work until a 100% PHA review with all cost estimates in place. After a couple of missed projects, all parties will gety reasonable of be sent packing. As the PM or Project Engineer, you have to provide adult supervision.
RE: Too many safety concerns?
You can't look at what the average person would do and designing the safety measures for them. If you did, you'd have a 50% mortality rate! You need to look at what the .0001% person would do (assuming you only want a 1 in a million chance of injury). Now it gets to be a lot clearer why it seems that we're designing for idiots. It's because we are.
RE: Too many safety concerns?
Hahaha, now I understand some EH&S people. They might be having us desing for themselves! For even most operators seem to be offended with a few of the safety features.
I believe in basic safety practices and safeguards for non-obvious hazards, but I am still baffled by some requirements. I guess I will have to abide to the 'standard' anyway.
RE: Too many safety concerns?
Then you need to do a little research.
There's dead people behind every rule.
Not all are because of stupid people. Are you familiar with stupid management? Sometimes smart people do stupid things because of managements stress on more production and lower cost. More accidents can be laid at the feet of these idiots than the stupidity of the guy operating the system in the plant you designed.
RE: Too many safety concerns?
That's why aircraft carriers always require TWO Landing Signal Officiers (LSOs) to watch EACN and EVERY landing, because the pilots often get engrossed in watching the landing signals and forget other tasks they're supposed to be doing.
TTFN
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
RE: Too many safety concerns?
The word obvious is just a relative term. For example, as an engineer it is obvious to me that all season tires lose their grip in winter, and that there is extensive evidence that winter tires are far safer in the cold weather. The problem is that the vast majority of people are not engineers, and when they see a commercial in TV that says that all season tires are good, well they might believe it.
Consequently, it is a law in many places to use winter tires during cold weather.
RE: Too many safety concerns?
RE: Too many safety concerns?
The example in the original post of using a staircase as a second means of escape as apposed to a ladder. I agree with the staircase. If it is a means of escape, something has gone wrong. The structure has collapsed, is unstable and you need to get off, but the main means of escape is blocked. And the collapse has resulted in you breaking your leg. With the help of a colleague you can escape down a stair case, but not down a ladder. Therefore a ladder is not suitable as a means of escape. (This is an example, which is open to critism, but is provided to show a point)
My approach to the design of the above situation is to use a hierarchy of means of access where you should put all equipment at ground level as the first means of access.
State that in your design brief and then make it work. Be inovative. If you can achieve this, then you can eliminate the platform and the end result is a better and cheaper solution. I regularly use this approach and regularly reduce the overall cost of projects, while making them better.
Another example, we were asked to replace some pumps which were in a confined space with a potentially explosive atmosphere. To enter the space safely to do any maintenance required three operatives. I decided, there would be no equipment in the confined space or the explosive atmosphere. This allowed me to select equiment which did not have to be designed for the explosive environment and cut the maintenance costs by a third. Again, by eliminating the hazard, I was able to produce a better product and cut costs.
So I would suggest using the health and safety guidance as a tool to improve your designs.
RE: Too many safety concerns?
Likewise, hardhats in the middle of the field; how did you get there? Did you have to go through trees with low branches? Ever get clonked on the head by a branch?
TTFN
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
RE: Too many safety concerns?
And about getting clonked on the head by a branch... well, I never wear a helmet when I go hiking, just when I go biking.
As for the ladder, maybe I should clarify a bit. It is for a catwalk on top of tanks, very seldom used. There has to be two means of egress, according to regulations. It never specifies a staircase or ladder. It could be a pole from the way the regulation reads.
RE: Too many safety concerns?
RE: Too many safety concerns?
We once had a Law student work with use because his dad told him it was good summer money for a collage student…you can imagine how long a rich kid lawyer lasted.
It makes me not complain about my desk job and benefits package so much.