Level instrument on vacuum tower
Level instrument on vacuum tower
(OP)
Just wanted your opinions on what works best for you in a vacuum tower for MVGO. We are cosidering a guided wave radar and also a Displacer. What are your suggestions?
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS Come Join Us!Are you an
Engineering professional? Join Eng-Tips Forums!
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail. Posting GuidelinesJobs |
Level instrument on vacuum tower
|
RE: Level instrument on vacuum tower
Patricia Lougheed
Please see FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies for tips on how to make the best use of the Eng-Tips Forums.
RE: Level instrument on vacuum tower
Mark Hutton
RE: Level instrument on vacuum tower
RE: Level instrument on vacuum tower
1. hydrostatic (pressure at the bottom of the liquid column)
This will be sensitive to headspace pressure and density of the liquid. Headspace pressure can be accounted for by measuring it and using the differential pressure to imply the liquid level, taking into account the density. If density varies then a third pressure sensor a known height above the bottom sensor is needed. The fluid density can be derived from this pressure differential.
2. Float and position measurement (I think this is a displacer type you refer to?)
A physical float and LVDT will provide a reliable level independent of vessel pressure. This system will be sensitive to density variations due to the float floating higher or lower.
3. Ultrasonic or Radar (distance measurement based on time of flight for a sound or radio wave)
Time of flight for reflected waves is independent of vessel pressure and fluid density. Ultrasonic (sound) can be affected by headspace density and other sources of reflections in the tank eg agitator blades and baffles. For a vacuum vessel application where variable vapour levels exist there may be an un reliable measurement. Radar is immune to headspace density variations, but more sensitive to tank internal reflections. This has been solved by the use of a guide (aerial) to reduce the false echoes.
4. Discrete level switches.
Simple robust switch at the level the process needs to be controlled to. If the control requirement is on at level 1 and off at level 2 then 2 switches can be used to reliably solve the problem.
The answer depends upon process requirements – accuracy, switching range, fulid and process conditions etc.
Mark Hutton
RE: Level instrument on vacuum tower
Mark Hutton
RE: Level instrument on vacuum tower
RE: Level instrument on vacuum tower
I am not an instrumentation specialist, but i have noticed that modern vacuum towers use nucleonic level transmitters. Two of the recent vacuum towers I've worked on used this type of level control. I was asked to design the vessel clips for the nuclear source and detector.
Browsing through the internet, I have read that radar level detectors does not work well in vacuum towers because of interference from inlet vapor or steam. (sorry forgot the website)
Here's a website for an overview of different level instruments
http://
RE: Level instrument on vacuum tower
Regards
StoneCold
RE: Level instrument on vacuum tower
The nucleonic level transmitter I mentioned in my previous post was used at the bottom of the tower. At the MVGO tray, I normally see differential pressure level transmitters and magnetic level gauges used on them.