×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Parameters for using 555 Timer

Parameters for using 555 Timer

Parameters for using 555 Timer

(OP)
Q1: — What is the frequency range I can get out of a 555 timer?

Q2: — Can I use a 555 with a positive ground system? IE: will it work as long as V at pin 1 is lower than V at pin 8? (If I connect pin 8 at 0 VDC and pin 1 at -12 VDC, will the waveform output be a negative voltage instead of a positive voltage output when I connected pin 8 to +12 VDC and pin 1 to ground?)

RE: Parameters for using 555 Timer

There's the datasheet to know better about its capabilities.

http://www.national.com/JS/searchDocument.do?textfield=lm555c

To operate it with the positive being the ground, you have to remember that all the waveforms are documented for the ground pin of the chip being the reference.  This is especially important if you want to to control it through its inputs.  Any noise on your negative supply may be interpreted as noise on these inputs if they are driven from a source that has its reference at the ground.

RE: Parameters for using 555 Timer

There is (was?) a CMOS variation of the 555 with significantly different specs.

RE: Parameters for using 555 Timer

"better"

The CMOS version is un-better in terms of sourcing, and especially sinking, current. My gut knew that there was something un-better about the CMOS version, but I had to look it up (just now).

RE: Parameters for using 555 Timer

Uh sorry, vice versa on sink and source. CMOS sink 100mA, source only 10mA.

Normal 555 is 200mA either way.

RE: Parameters for using 555 Timer

Really! I'll take yur word for it.

I remember being directed to the CMOS version once because it sank more current than the 'plain' one.  I think I was mis-guided.



I found the original Signetics Data Sheet,(I worked there after all), and even it stated 200mA.  Maybe the discharge pin??  As it's not even categorized in the SE555.

Anywho, thanks for the correction.

Keith Cress
Flamin Systems, Inc.- http://www.flaminsystems.com

RE: Parameters for using 555 Timer

The bipolar was a current gulper. The CMOS is better in that way.

Keith. You worked with Signetics? They produced the aesthetically most pleasant data books ever. Keep two of them. Dated 1974.

Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
--------------------------------------
100 % recycled posting: Electrons, ideas, finger-tips have been used over and over again...

RE: Parameters for using 555 Timer

Yes I did,(straight outta school).  Was one of three EEs developing an advanced mechanization system.  We took the tested wafers sawed them up, placed them on the lead frame, wire bonded them, molded a single lead frame, punched out and bend the lead frame and separated the ICs without a human touching anything.  Used a CP/M based computer. Designed and hand made 8048 SBCs and Z80s. Hand coded them in HEX.  Hacked commercial saw keyboards so we could press the buttons with the SBCs.  Reed relays galore.

It was a blast.  Got it all working before it was expected.  They fired our boss and reassigned us to a dork.  We all quit the same day.

Yes they did produce nice Data Books on bright white very thin paper.

I probably only have the first one with the 555 application notes in it.  8-1/2 x 11 red and white cover.  Kept it because it had the clearest descriptions I ever saw for the 555.

Keith Cress
Flamin Systems, Inc.- http://www.flaminsystems.com

RE: Parameters for using 555 Timer

The bipolar 555 has a nasty switching characteristic it puts both the sink and source on for a few nano seconds when the output changes state this draws a horrid hefty and fast edged pulse(>500mA)from the supply which will invariably drop in response to the pulse, it is essential that very good decoupling is employed with this fast spike.
The thing can drive a relay directly but only if a forward diode is connected between the output and relay as well as the usual commutating diode, without it the device will tend to self trigger on switch off.
The CMOS version does not suffer these drawbacks.
Other than that its a very handy and simple little device and its no surprise that it still gets used in considerable quantities, even where it shouldn't.

RE: Parameters for using 555 Timer

Off topic-

Keith.  Remember Signetics Memory Systems (SMS)? We built
the 8X300 micros.  That was my first real job out of school!
Sunnyvale based company, spun off from the big S, went
public and I think it went bust about mid 80's or so.
Wire bonded cpu's and I/O chips on a ceramic header as
well as other "innovations".

We too had a blast there.  Everybody worked.  We got into
floppy disk controllers.  Even the VP of engineering there
got into the act.  He was the best with digital phase lock
loops, so it was his head that was stuck in a scope hood
in the lab.

Yes, the Signetics data books were the nicest. Unfortunately,
I don't have much need for 8T32's anymore, but still keep
my '74 versions of the TI databook.  Nowadays though, thank
God for the internet! Data sheets galore!

  Cheers,

    Rich S.

RE: Parameters for using 555 Timer

I remember the 8X300.  We built a processor in 81 in which nine of them were stacked if I remember right.

Back to the 555.  As much as I hate them a novel application is a voltage monitor with separate set points for on and off.

RE: Parameters for using 555 Timer

Yep the 8X300.

Actually we could get 68000s too.  I think we second sourced them.

I still have a few. Gawd they were huge!! Like two handed DIPs.

We had a large surplus room full of equipment. At lunch we could peruse it. You could pick up full chassis computers based on 8x300s for $20.  I bought a bunch of shiny stuff..

Keith Cress
Flamin Systems, Inc.- http://www.flaminsystems.com

RE: Parameters for using 555 Timer

I also noticed the voltage peaks bogeyman mentioned.  A buffer transistor would be OK between the pin and load.

I thought the 555 was a hero of the last century.  There are plenty of better timer ICs today.

Good luck with it, anyway!
Gonzalo

RE: Parameters for using 555 Timer

(OP)
"... I thought the 555 was a hero of the last century.  There are plenty of better timer ICs today. "

"What are the "better timers"?

RE: Parameters for using 555 Timer

I mean there are lots of timer-ICs, better than the 555.

RE: Parameters for using 555 Timer

(OP)
"... I mean there are lots of timer-ICs, better than the 555"

Sorry. I mean, "What are the better timer IC's?" What would you use/recommend over the 555?

RE: Parameters for using 555 Timer

For a mechanical engineer, presumably intimidated by software and complicated electronics, the 555 is a really good choice.

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Parameters for using 555 Timer

No problem Cincinnati ;)
Wikipedia says the 555 was born in 1971 (even older than Iron Maiden and myself!). Here some few alternatives for this faithful chip:

ICM7555 : low-power 555 (3-18V VCC, 1/3 mA quiescent)

566: VCO-IC with built-in 50% duty, buffered square/sawtooth output, less external parts.

U2102B: Integrated timer from Atmel. Useful for dimmers and phase control for IGBT/MOSFET drivers.

8253: Rather old, but somewhat interesting for digital apps.

Regards,
Gonzalo

 

RE: Parameters for using 555 Timer

I concur with Mike, the 555 may very well do the job for you.  Simple and well documented chip.  We know its bugs and its remedies.  But let's take the other route.  What frequency range do you have to work with?  What do you intend to do with this part? Perhaps we can give you better inputs if we know better about what you are trying to achieve.

RE: Parameters for using 555 Timer

As for the other chips mentioned and not mentioned:

The 556 is a dual 555 that you may be able to find.

The 566 is a VCO, not a timer.

The 8253 is a triple timer with a lot of interesting behaviors, but it starts up stupid, and requires programming over a host bus before it does anything useful.

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Parameters for using 555 Timer

(OP)
Clarification on Signal Requirement:

I need an electrical signal that resembles the shape of a heartbeat pattern. I need it to carry 50-100W. I want to operate at 0V baseline. At t=0, I want to create a +5000V spike, and immediately drop it back to 0V, followed immediately by a -5000V spike, immediately returning to 0V. I want approximately 10% on-time.  I want capability to repeat this cycle, varying the rest period between voltage spike pairs to generate a frequency between 40KHz and 1.5MHz.

I originally thought I would start with a +/- 12V signal and boost it to 5000V; I picked 12V because I believe I could use an ordinary automotive coil to transform voltages from +/-12V to +/- 5000V. However, since coils operate today in the magnitude of 25kV output, perhaps I could use a smaller input voltage (1-2 V) to get the Vout in the 5000V range.

Although an ME, I have a little experience with Process Control. I seem to recall DACs can output 1-5V.  I could foresee using either a timing circuit or a computer and a lookup table, to create an output waveform.

I hope this clarification helps you visualize what I am attempting to accomplish. Can you give me additional assistance?

RE: Parameters for using 555 Timer

If you can buy the device you want, do so.  At any price, it will be cheaper than building one.

The 555s that I've let the smoke out of wouldn't go that fast.  Neither would the DACs.  

I'm sure there's been progress, but I'm also sure that Moore's Law doesn't apply to analog circuits.


Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Parameters for using 555 Timer

(OP)


As far as I know, I cannot buy one.

If it will be difficult getting a chip or DAC to run this fast, how feasible is it to use maybe 4 channels each at 1/4 the frequency and doing a delay between them to get to the desired frequency?

In this scenario:

Channel No 1 would be creating pulse no. 1, 5,   9, ...
Channel No 2 would be creating pulse no. 2, 6, 10, ...
Channel No 3 would be creating pulse no. 3, 7, 11, ...
Channel No 4 would be creating pulse no. 4, 8, 12, ...

How many channels would I need to reach 40KHZ to 1.5MHz using a DAC?

What is your recommendation on this type of design? Is there a better way to go?

RE: Parameters for using 555 Timer

If you always want the same wave shape and amplitude, just a scalable rep rate, then you can use an astable circuit, and trigger it when you want a pulse pair (probably not with a 555).  But the wave shape you get will depend on the load, and you haven't told us much about that.

At this point, it would probably be best to befriend (or pay) an electronics engineer with linear high power RF experience.  The ones you want are probably old, cranky, and not into computers, so you won't find them on the Web.

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Parameters for using 555 Timer

A heartbeat frequency of 1.5MHz.  Well, if you want a total control over the shape of the waveform, one way to go is to use a video DAC, and memory system to feed say 128 samples per waveform period.  Video DACs can clock at more than 200Mhz.  That puts us far from a 555 timer though...  but you would have a complete control over your waveform.

I have never used them but, but aren't there on the market the so-called "arbitrary waveform generators" to perform such a function?  If so, it could avoid a design for this part of your project.

RE: Parameters for using 555 Timer

5KV wideband spikes...I guess building digital signals at those frequencies won't be very cheap.  

Instead of using the full output from a 555, You can detect the pulse edges, thus getting a signal with twice the frequency.
I guess an opamp differenciator could do the job, with +/-  power rails and rectified output.

I'm still figuring out the 10% duty issue.

Good luck with it!

Gonzalo

RE: Parameters for using 555 Timer

Ok, first let me recap your desire, to make sure we are one the same page. You want a variable A.C. between 40Khz and 1.5 Mhz using a 555 in astable mode. You want a short duration spiked waveform, to drive a HV transformer.

This, at first glance, does not seem to be much of a prob. First, there are many 555 timer brands/types. They do not all share the exact same ratings. These break down into two major categories, Bipolar and CMOS.

The best specs I have found for a bipolar (NE555) have a maximum stable frequency around 500Khz in astable mode. However, the CMOS LM555C is rated as stable to around 3.0 MHZ. The CMOS cant source directly what you need current wise, but has the frequency capability. The bipolar can source the current you need, but lacks the frequency.

SOLUTION 1:

Use the CMOS 555 to drive a fast switching NPN, which sources enough current to drive a;

1. NPN power MOSFET. This will give you square wave 0v baseline DC.
2. A Triac with a separate A.C. supplied source, for A.C to the load.

SOLUTION 2:

Use the CMOS (or maybe a CMOS 556) split the output to drive a JK FlipFlop to invert the signal on one branch, and then join the two signals back together to form a square wave A.C. signal. (If I remember correctly.) Using paired NPN and PNP transistors and mosfets should do the trick.

Don't get me wrong, I am not an engineer, but a hobbyist who has built a square wave function generator using a 555, that puts out a better wave form on my B&K scope than my factory built B&K Function Generator does, and worlds better of a waveform than my el cheapo victor!

555's are anything but a "has been", though you have to consider their shortcomings, as well as their strengths. However, tell me of ANY component that isn't true of.

pauldude000

RE: Parameters for using 555 Timer

I believe we may need to start at the load and work backwards.

Plus and minus 5KV spikes, fair enough, but into what sort of load ?  What is the required half amplitude duration of these spikes ?

From that, we may need to design some type of resonant pulse transformer system to do the job. Then perhaps some sort of capacitor discharge system to fire it off, and a damping or energy recovery system to stop it after one full sinusoid.

If the pulse repetition frequency is 1.5 Mhz, these pulses are not going to be that wide, if they still look like narrow pulses at that frquency.

RE: Parameters for using 555 Timer

On the previous thread, we were left the initial impression that the issue was creating an arbitrary waveform, precisely controlling the waveform using PROMs etc. Now the requirement seem to be just a 'spike'.

WS: "I believe we may need to start at the load and work backwards."

An excellent point. Making an arbitrary waveform (if still required) is relatively trivial in comparison to making it +/- 5000 volts and 50-100 watts.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources