×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Longevity of Timber Lagging

Longevity of Timber Lagging

Longevity of Timber Lagging

(OP)
When dealing with city engineers, architects, owner’s reps, and pretty much anyone who is unfamiliar with earth retention we often run into a question about the longevity of the timber lagging used as temporary shoring in a conventional beam and lagging retaining wall.  I'm referring  specifically to temporary systems where the beams and lagging are ultimately buried and abandoned in place. The aforementioned parties have serious reservations about the system because they believe that in 5 – 10 years the timber lagging will “rot” away, leaving a void that can cause settlement and cracking in adjacent sidewalks and structures.  

 

The usual argument that we defer to is our experience and the track record of this shoring system.   Most of downtown San Diego, for example, was built with timber shoring elements of some type over the past 75 years and yet we don’t have differential settlement problems caused by its disintegration.  As I’m sure you can imagine this usually doesn’t provide much comfort to the said inquisitors.  

 

Furthermore, the manufacturers and suppliers of the timber are very hesitant to provide any kind of guarantee or information period on the sustainability of their product for this application.  

 

Is anyone aware of any texts, publications, research, etc. on this topic?

RE: Longevity of Timber Lagging

The lumber used now is commonly very different from the dense, old growth. It is still possible to get some sizes in old growth, but it gets costly.

Also. the treatments processes and chemical have been changed in the last 10 to 15 years as have the concentrations - Health and ecology concerns. The lack of history may be a reason for the reluctance to make real guarnatees.

RE: Longevity of Timber Lagging

adh06,

If the timbers end up below the prevailing groundwater level, then I would believe that they would end up lasting indefinitely.

Realistically, though, the timbers do not rot into nothing - the "structure" stays intact even when the strength is no longer there. I would imagine that 3x8 timbers would take a very long time (decades to centuries, depending on the environment) to completely disappear and get replaced by a residual organic soil.

Jeff

RE: Longevity of Timber Lagging

Nice search, adh06.  I was fretting about having to retype all of that info.  I forgot it had been addressed before.

The issue really isn't that controversial.  On almost all jobs I see and work on, all but the top 3 to 4 feet of lagging is left in place.  Almost always it is untreated.  Certain owners, usually state highway departments and people who are afraid of termites specify treated wood.  In those few cases, the wood is still ungraded, mixed hardwoods which are not kiln dried but are CCA treated to refusal.  This provides some token protection at a reasonable cost.

RE: Longevity of Timber Lagging

(OP)
I would agree that it's not very controversial among professionals in this field.  The controversy arises when people who are unfamiliar with this type of application get involved; and usually they are the ones making the decisions.  smile  
 
My firm will be constructing a CalTrans designed soldier pile wall in the summer that takes conservative design to a new level.  For a 7 foot cut height they have specced HP14x117's with 6x12 treated lagging timbers and a 12" CIP concrete facing.  

I guess that's one way to address the issue!  

RE: Longevity of Timber Lagging

adh06,

Wow.

I would try to see if I could bid a less conservative section. It shouldn't be hard - even using FHWA/AASHTO design criteria and guidance.

Jeff

RE: Longevity of Timber Lagging

I've read through this tread and the older thread.  There are some good points and some good references.  I'm not sure that its enough ammunition to convince some of the more stubborn engineers that we've all come across.

Has anyone ever come across a study that either supports or refutes the hypothesis that ground movements will result from the deterioration of wood?

RE: Longevity of Timber Lagging

(OP)
I would agree SEshore.  Despite the fact that so much of Geotechnical engineering is based on experience and precedence it can still be a difficult sell at times.  

I think this would be a fantastic topic for someone to publish a literature review on.  Perhaps if the lack of hard research was highlighted in a publication it would spur some post-graduate work.  

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources