×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Economical Substructure Design

Economical Substructure Design

Economical Substructure Design

(OP)
Does anyone have any guidance or input on ways to reduce substructure costs on local road and minor bridges designed with LRFD? What tricks have you used in the past? What exceptions in the code have you used to your advantage? Do any state DOT's out there provide guidance in their bridge design guides on this matter?

It seems to me the LRFD code sometimes yields very robust designs that are much stronger than the substructures they are designed to replace. Given this, it appears there's a lot of reserve capacity in these new substructures that could be reduced on local roads/minor bridges in order to save construction costs. As with anything, this comes with the trade off of increased risk or future maintenance, but I'm very intrested to hear others thoughts and ideas on this topic.  


 

RE: Economical Substructure Design

I have not seen any substantial differences between the two.

one of the matters that is most pointed out is the use of shallow foundations where possible.  I can't say that I've ever known a DOT or engineer to actual feel comfortable with putting a bridge on spread footings on soil when it is within their means to use rock or drive piles.  The issue, of course, is settlement (scour where streams are involved) and no one really wants to have a bridge experience settlement.  

However, if you can see past this matter and get your client to buy off on it (after doing the analysis and showing that settlement is neglible), then you'll see some savings.

Regards,
Qshake
pipe
Eng-Tips Forums:Real Solutions for Real Problems Really Quick.

RE: Economical Substructure Design

Drilled shafts or drilled piers that are field tested to ultimate capacity give cost effective designs even when FOS of 3 is used.  Most untested designs use much higher FOS with subsequent increase in cost.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources