×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Capacity of Piles installed by vibratory methods
3

Capacity of Piles installed by vibratory methods

Capacity of Piles installed by vibratory methods

(OP)

I have a project where the contractor is installing 4 inch steel pipe into the ground by vibratory methods.  The design loads are low 15.9 kN for bearing, 3 kN for lateral and 10.2 kN for uplift.  How does one calculate capacity of these piles?  Can skin friction still be taken into account ?  What about uplift if there is no skin friction?  Soil conditions are sand to 3 m and then silt / sand and silt to 6.5 m.  Does someone have any experience with this?

RE: Capacity of Piles installed by vibratory methods

Method of installation should have no bearing on the capacity of piles.  Same as driven piles.

RE: Capacity of Piles installed by vibratory methods

From a structural engineer's standpoint, a 4 inch pipe pile would be a friction pile almost by default unless it end bears on rock.  Determining the capacity is in the purview of the geotech.    

RE: Capacity of Piles installed by vibratory methods

You can't predict the capacity of a pile installed by vibratory methods but given the intensity of the loads, testing them would be quite cheap !

RE: Capacity of Piles installed by vibratory methods

I thought that GRL WEAP couild run using vibratory hammers.  However, I do agree with the above answers.  A static analysis could still be run and these small capacity piles would be easy to load test.

RE: Capacity of Piles installed by vibratory methods

2
The latest version of the FHWA manual on driven piles (Pub No. FHWA NHI-05-042) has this to say about vibratory hammer installed piles (Page 9-182)

"Agencies are often requested to allow pile installation with a vibratory pile hammer instead of an impact hammer. Mosher (1987) summarized the results from five sites where piles where installed by both impact and vibratory hammers. This study concluded that for a significant majority of the cases, piles installed in sand with a vibratory hammer had a lower ultimate capacity than impact driven piles at the same site. Mosher also concluded that time dependent soil strength changes occurred equally for both installation methods. Hence, the capacity of the vibratory installed piles did not increase to the capacity of the impact driven piles with time. However, it was also observed that impact driving a vibratory installed pile would increase the capacity of the vibratory installed pile to that of an impact driven pile.

O’Neill and Vipulanandan (1989) performed a laboratory evaluation of piles installed with vibratory hammers. This laboratory study found impact driven piles had a 25% greater unit shaft resistance and a 15 to 20% higher unit toe resistance than vibratory installed piles in medium dense to dense, uniform, fine sand. However, in very dense, uniform, fine sand, the impact driven pile had a 20 to 30% lower unit shaft resistance and approximately a 30% lower unit toe resistance than the vibratory installed pile.

These two studies indicate use of vibratory pile installation rather than impact driving will affect the ultimate pile capacity that can be achieved at a given pile penetration depth. Therefore, communication between design and construction personnel should occur, and the influence of vibratory pile installation be evaluated when it is proposed. Impact driving a specific final depth of vibratory installed piles may provide a foundation that meets the engineer’s performance requirements at reduced installation cost."

The references given above are:

Moser, R.L. (1987). Comparison of Axial Capacity of Vibratory Driven Piles to Impact Driven Piles. USAEWES Technical Report ITL-877, 36.

O’Neill, M.W. and Vupulanandan, C. (1989). Laboratory Evaluation of Piles Installed with Vibratory Drivers. NCHRP Report 316, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.

RE: Capacity of Piles installed by vibratory methods

Very nice, Panars.  Star!

RE: Capacity of Piles installed by vibratory methods

(OP)
Thanks everyone.  I have decided to design piles using values which are inbetween bored and driven piles.  

RE: Capacity of Piles installed by vibratory methods

Thanks vulcanhammer.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources