×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Engineer of record responsibility

Engineer of record responsibility

Engineer of record responsibility

(OP)
Hi Everyone!

I have a house addition project under construction. The owner gave me a letter telling " The attic area is covered by plywood without engineer's approval". He plans to use the attic as an extra storage while I haven't design it for that load.
Now what should be my response, if he tries to take the resposibility by giving me the letter?

RE: Engineer of record responsibility

I am confused! Are you the contractor or engineer?

I think you may be talking about liability here rather than responsibility, although they are closely related. If the Owner is intending something that you did not approve of, I would make that clearly known. You might also say that it can be done for additional money. Reference the code section where it must be designed specifically for more load to accomodate storage.
 
Before you escalate the situation, make sure you have gotten paid then copy the building inspector if need be!

RE: Engineer of record responsibility

(OP)
Thank you Jike for your comment.

By the Way, I am the engineer of record. I guess my question more specificly is the following:

" When a homeowner (Client) wants to do something which is not per approved plans and he wants to "kind of" take the responsibility or liability, Aren't we supposed to stand against it?

The fact is that covering the attic floor by plywood is not against the code and even the inspector can not stop it. It is the future usage of that area which is going to introduce risk to the structure.

RE: Engineer of record responsibility

Some jurisdictions require (for those I am/was building official) a sign be placed near the attic access that the attic cannot be used for storage.  If the trusses/ceiling joists were designed for 20 psf live load, no sign was necessary.  This condition was also placed on the C of O.

Sign or no sign, no one can stop a homeowner from storing up there.

You may want to write a clarifying letter to the owner to cover yourself.
  

Don Phillips
http://worthingtonengineering.com

RE: Engineer of record responsibility

Would this not fall under the "protect the public" creed?  I dont care how stupid the owner is.  If the roof caves in while he's got fifty people in the house for a graduation party, you're liable if you knew about it and didn't take it to the authorities.  It's one thing if he does it on his own without you knowing but I think it's completely wrong if you're given documentation and look the other way.

RE: Engineer of record responsibility

I think you simply write a letter to the homeowner stating clearly that the attic cannot carry more than x amount of load (10 psf?).  Beyond that, you can't really go to the city/authority with a speculation that the homeowner MAY misuse the space by overloading.

All you can do it notify the owner of the house what his physicaly limitations are.

How would you know if the homeowner is really loading the attic beyond x psf?  Get a warrant to investigate?

RE: Engineer of record responsibility

I don't think it's speculation if the owner hands you a letter stating his intent as the OP indicated.

The owner may think he's relieving the engineer of liability with the letter, while in reality is actually dragging him into it.

RE: Engineer of record responsibility

Tell them the consequences in writing, then tell them verbally not to get you involved if they decide to proceed with it anyway.

If you get involved then you have to resolve it properly.

Also, you may want to tell then to do it after final inspection, so that you do not have to approve the building like that.

RE: Engineer of record responsibility

If his letter is unclear in the least or implies liability on your part, I would respond back to him in writing.

RE: Engineer of record responsibility

I agree with JAE.  My first instinct was copy the building department with your letter, but you really don't know what's going on.  Does the owner know the difference between storage to us (could be 125 psf), and storage for the Christmas decorations, baby stuff, spare floor tiles and the like?  Maybe you're talking about two different things.  

If the letter stated the guy wanted to store extra cmu block or create another living space, or something that you knew was too heavy, you might have an argument for notifying someone other than the owner, imo.  Many people store things in the attic by laying down plywood.  Storage to them and storage per the code live load isn't always the same thing.   

RE: Engineer of record responsibility

Live loads for residential per the IBC is:

uninhabitable attics without storage 10 psf

uninhabitable attics with storage 20 psf

not 125 psf

RE: Engineer of record responsibility

(OP)
Hello Gentlmen:

First of all, I would like to thank each and every of you who tried to help me with valuable comments and suggestions. I did read each comment very carefully and thought about them. Because this is not a question for this specific case only, but also it is an important lesson for the future too.

I think by blending what I read so far and what I think personally, the best policy is to explain the owner in writing that since there is no officially accepted method to limit or police the storage usage (i.e. the magnitude of storage load) the plywood shall be removed for me to be able to approve the construction.

Personally, I do believe that as Professional Engineers who know and understand better about the loads/structures/behaviors and failer consiquences, we have ethical responsibility to stop/prohibit non-safe applications/practices/......

Thank you again
Vanik Abedian
Kartez Engineering, Inc.

RE: Engineer of record responsibility

I agree with JAE.  I think that not approving construction based upon the plywood covering the attic area is a bit extreme.  I have seen many attics with plywood covering them simply for walking access (not necessarily for storage).  If you assume that the presence of plywood covering an attic means there will be storage exceeding the code minimum design load, you'd never approve any construction project.  Writing a letter to the owner indicating what the design load is is enough to cover yourself.       

RE: Engineer of record responsibility

I also agree with JAE, but would go one step further.  

I would submit a copy of the letter to the local building department and have it notarized and filed as a legal document, permanently attached to the jurisdictional file for that particular residence, so that upon any title search in any future sale, that document will come up.  In this way, your responsibility to communicate with the "homeowner", no matter whom they are, is satisfied.

Courts view it as your responsibility to communicate to the homeowner any restrictions or limitations, not the homeowners to ask you for such.  You, as the design professional, have the burden of proof should anything happen.  Cover your ars.

Mike McCann
McCann Engineering

RE: Engineer of record responsibility

This thread goes to prove that a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.  It's a house!  People store things in the attics of their houses and they don't need a structural engineer's permission to do so.  What I see most of you proposing is for the government to get more involved with our day-to-day lives than they already are.  Forget engineering judgement - use some common sense.

RE: Engineer of record responsibility

Quote:

What I see most of you proposing is for the government to get more involved with our day-to-day lives than they already are.

I didn't propose that.  I think the focus was on what to do as an ethical engineer to safeguard the public.  Even though it's a house, the original poster was an engineer who was involved in the design.

Just trying to do the right thing as an engineer isn't being a pro-government cheerleader.

RE: Engineer of record responsibility

Allright, I should have said "some" instead of "most".

My point stands - it's a house.  If the structure won't handle normal household attic storage, it's designed way too close to the margins to begin with.  And yes, I know, there will be those who require that "normal" be spelled out in some code or standard - but it doesn't have to be that hard.  Common sense is all it takes sometimes.

Safeguarding the public does not mean that we need to act as nannys and spell out exactly what an owner can and cannot do with their property.  We've got enough laws/rules/codes for that as it is.  In this particular case - we've not been presented with the layout, but I'm guessing that once construction is complete, it will be impossible, or nearly so, to get full sheets of plywood up into the space to act as a floor.  Requiring their removal to "safeguard the public" is ridiculous.

RE: Engineer of record responsibility

PatBethea-
Additionally, most houses aren't engineered.
If one is and there is a failure then the engineer is on the hook.

RE: Engineer of record responsibility

The design is your responsibility, what gets done with the building afterwards is not.

keep photographs on file of the attic without the boarding and you can then claim ignorance.

RE: Engineer of record responsibility

I think we are overanalyzing this a bit as well.  If an engineer came to me (building official) with the issue, I could only enforce what the code specifically says.  And there is nothing prohibiting the plywood.  Placing some document in file does not really help either.

Telling a cop your neighbor speeds down the street is one thing (in plain, visible sight) but telling him he beats his wife would invite claims of privacy violations trying to gather that evidence.

If there is a failure, and the owner wants someone else to pay for it when he caused it, this would bring out the lawyers and forensic engineers.  I think there would be enough evidence to suggest the owner caused his failure and any civil case would be not be successful.  When I did forensic engineering for a short while, I saw many property owners trying to get money from insurance companys for not maintaining a house. Few went to court since even the lawyers knew a payday was probable.

Don Phillips
http://worthingtonengineering.com

RE: Engineer of record responsibility

Nobody wants his attic to collapse. Storing your chistmas decorations wont hurt it, putting boxes and boxes of old documents may. I agree putting plywood in an attic does not violate anythig. However your owner has raised this issue. Find out what he wants to do. See if the attic can be modified to support what he wants to do. Explain that it will never be cheaper than doing during construction.

RE: Engineer of record responsibility

csd72:

You stated that "The design is your responsibility, what gets done with the building afterwards is not." - and I have to take issue with that in part.  

If you have no direct knowledge of the overloading or the intention to do so, that is one thing.  However, that is not the case here as the engineer has prior knowledge that this, not maybe, but WILL occur.  He has to CYA here as I guarantee that the engineer will be on the hook in court if he does not if there is a failure.

Mike McCann
McCann Engineering

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources